Re: [vchkpw] Parse with spamassassin, then honour smtproutes?
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 07:05, Rick Macdougall wrote: > Hi, > > You can not do it that way. > > The only way I can see to do it is to set up a dummy sub-domain and > forward the mail to that sub-domain... > > ie - domain.com mx = your server, mail2.domain.com mx = real server > > .qmail-default = > |/usr/bin/spamc -f -u spamd |forward "$DEFAULT"@mail2.domain.com > > Regards, > Rick I Recently setup a 'forward to existing domain & save locally' config for a domain that used a second qmail installtion, and use the 'forward' from that qmail. .qmail-default: | /var/qmail2/bin/forward "$DEFAULT"@thatdomain.com where /var/qmail2/control/smtproutes: thatdomain.com:205.62.123.123 That'll work...For me, that domain is scanned by SpamAssassin before it's forwarded. Rick > > Michael Bellears wrote: > > > I have multiple domains running on one server, and have been asked to > > accept mail for a domain, parse it with spamassassin, then forward to > > remote mail server. > > > > I have tried adding the domain(eg example.com via vqadmin), adding an > > smtproutes entry, then creating an .qmail-default: > > > > |/usr/bin/spamc -f -u spamd |forward "$DEFAULT"@example.com > > > > But the message fails (loops): > > > > 2003-05-28 16:33:10.422753500 delivery 10263: failure: > > This_message_is_looping:_it_already_has_my_Delivered-To_line._(#5.4.6) > > > > > > Regards, > > MB > > > >
Re: [vchkpw] Parse with spamassassin, then honour smtproutes?
Hi, You can not do it that way. The only way I can see to do it is to set up a dummy sub-domain and forward the mail to that sub-domain... ie - domain.com mx = your server, mail2.domain.com mx = real server .qmail-default = |/usr/bin/spamc -f -u spamd |forward "$DEFAULT"@mail2.domain.com Regards, Rick Michael Bellears wrote: I have multiple domains running on one server, and have been asked to accept mail for a domain, parse it with spamassassin, then forward to remote mail server. I have tried adding the domain(eg example.com via vqadmin), adding an smtproutes entry, then creating an .qmail-default: |/usr/bin/spamc -f -u spamd |forward "$DEFAULT"@example.com But the message fails (loops): 2003-05-28 16:33:10.422753500 delivery 10263: failure: This_message_is_looping:_it_already_has_my_Delivered-To_line._(#5.4.6) Regards, MB
Re: [vchkpw] interface for vpopmail
Hi Payal, How r u? U didn't mail me back.. When u came from home? YEs u r right there is no GUI for adding up domains. Mail me Back.. Manish Jain On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 10:57, Payal Rathod wrote: > Hi, > Do we have an GUI based interface for vpopmail to add domains and delete > domains? I guess qmailadmin does not do this. > > Thanks a lot and bye. > With warm regards, > -Payal > > > -- > "Visit GNU/Linux Success Stories" > http://payal.staticky.com > Guest-Book Section Updated. -- Manish Jain ISP Division Centre for Development of Advanced Computing C-56/1, Sector-62, Noida (UP) Phone: 0120-2402551 to 60 [Extn-803/718] FAX: 0120-2402569 -- Manish Jain ISP Division Centre for Development of Advanced Computing C-56/1, Sector-62, Noida (UP) Phone: 0120-2402551 to 60 [Extn-803/718] FAX: 0120-2402569
Re: [vchkpw] mail robot
Dear Masood The mail robot is used for sending automatic response to the sender. When a sender will send a mail to the mail robot a auto generated mail will be sent in reply to the sender and the message for the same u can type. If u have any further query mail me back.. Regards.. Manish Jain On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 20:04, Ahmad Masood Shah wrote: > I'm seening here in qmailadmin new mail robot option. I'm not able to > understand what does mean by mail robot. > Can someone please describe in detail what is mail robot and for what > purpose I can use it. > > Thank's for help :) > > > -- > > Best Regs, > Masood Ahmad Shah > -- Manish Jain ISP Division Centre for Development of Advanced Computing C-56/1, Sector-62, Noida (UP) Phone: 0120-2402551 to 60 [Extn-803/718] FAX: 0120-2402569 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on SpamScore?
Hi Peter, On Wed, 28 May 2003 10:26:17 +0200 Peter Palmreuther wrote: > Additionally this would be of much use for you. s/would/wouldn't/ -- Ciao, Pit
Re: [vchkpw] Spam filter
Hi Rick, On Tue, 27 May 2003 20:48:27 -0400 Rick Macdougall wrote: > I haven't tested this but setting the ENV variable within the smtp/run > file and then over-riding it for specific IP's in the tcp.smtp file > should work as well. It does. And IMHO it's the best approach. If I want mail to be passed through QS I define this as the default by setting appropriate ENV before starting qmail-smtpd, respectively tcpserver that starts qmail-smtpd. I than define in tcp.smtp.cdb what IPs are allowed to 'bypass' QS by setting QMAILQUEUE to '.../qmail-queue'. -- Ciao, Pit
Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin, Vpopmail, conditional handling on SpamScore?
Hi Dave, On Tue, 27 May 2003 16:42:33 -0500 Dave Richardson - Lists wrote: > I'm running the QMAILQUEUE patch with SpamAssassin into Vpopmail with > Mysql and Courier. > > I'm running SpamAssassin with spam threashold "required_hits" = 8. > > I allow direct delivery to the mailbox, but it is subject prefixed > "[SPAM]" (thus it is Spam Tagged) > > What I'd like to do is add another "threashold" (probably in SA?) where > the spam score of >15 is sent to /dev/null. Scores from 7-14.99 are > spam tagged (and delivered) and scores less than 7 are not spam tagged. Once there was a second threshold in SA that discarded mails with more than score XX. But IIRC it's gone now and also sent an autoreply instead of simply discarding the mail. Additionally this would be of much use for you. Qmail-scanner pushes a message to spamd. Even if spamd would decide to discard the mail and return nothing to qmail-scanner QS would handle this either as an error and pass the unaltered mail through or if it would get back an empty message pass the empty message through. So what you need as a modification to qmail-scanner that discards mails with a score above a defined threshold by itself. I'm using the "fast-spamd" method of qmail-scanner therefore it's easy to figure out the score the message got. Modifying QS shouldn't be that hard. If you're using the method where QS passes the mesasge to spamd and expectes the altered message back (instead of just the score) it could be more difficulty. As QS is pure Perl I'd suggest: go ahead, open a text editor of your choice and modify QS according to your needs. Pass the patch to the QS developer(s) and chances are it's included somewhere in the next release and more people will benefit from your idea and work. P.S.: For future mails to this list you really should disable "Reply-To". 1.) It's superfluous. It contains the same address as "From" and therefore is absolutely useless. 2.) It makes it impossible to easily reply to the list for those MUAs capable of List-Reply by evaluating 'List-Post' header. 'Reply-To' takes, for obvious reasons, precedence over 'List-Post'. Thank you. -- Ciao, Pit
Re: [vchkpw] bounce bounce messages
This is a qmail issue If you want to override the standard qmail behaviour and have all the double-bounces to go to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then you can do this : echo 'someone' > /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto echo 'somedomain.com' > /var/qmail/control/doublebouncehost I dont believe it is possible to dynamically send the doublebounce to the postmaster of the domain of the original recipient (if that makes sense!!) Michael. - Original Message - From: "Geoff Sweet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:30 PM Subject: [vchkpw] bounce bounce messages > Perhaps I missed something in the documentation, but in my install I am > having "bounced bounce" messages returning to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] So if I have a machine called mail.bob.com > and I host a dozen or so domains, all the "bounced bounce" messages are > coming to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Shouldn't those messages be going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe I > have something misconfigured? > > Any insight would be helpful. > > Geoff > > >
[vchkpw] bounce bounce messages
Perhaps I missed something in the documentation, but in my install I am having "bounced bounce" messages returning to [EMAIL PROTECTED] So if I have a machine called mail.bob.com and I host a dozen or so domains, all the "bounced bounce" messages are coming to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shouldn't those messages be going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe I have something misconfigured? Any insight would be helpful. Geoff