Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults

2003-08-22 Thread Ken Jones
I am still working with our web designer for the
inter7 development page.  There is more than just pointing
at source forge. So for the time being I will keep it up to date manually.

Ken

On Thursday 21 August 2003 4:12 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
 On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:48  PM, Paul L. Allen wrote:
  Any ideas (better still, fixes) would be appreciated.

 Please use 5.3.24 from SourceForge
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail/.

 Ken, please update http://inter7.com/develop.html to point to
 SourceForge for qmailadmin and vpopmail downloads.

 --
 Tom Collins
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester




[vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults

2003-08-21 Thread Paul L. Allen

I upgraded from 5.2.1 to 5.3.23 recently to get a fix for the bug in vchkpw
that stopped the authdaemond authentication working.  I found that vadduser
has a segmentation fault when I try to add a user (no switchs used).  By
not giving the password as a parameter I find that it waits until I press
return after entering the password a second time before segfaulting.  I
also found that vadduser does the same thing (and I suspect so will
vmoduser and vdeluser).

Configuration switches used to build it were:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
  --enable-tcp-server-file=/var/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp \
  --enable-tcp-rules-prog=/usr/bin/tcprules \
  --enable-roaming-users=y \
  --enable-relay-clear=30

Due to a setup I inherited which I'm reluctant to change, the original
vpopmail installation of a much earlier version has /home/vpopmail
specified as the home directory but /home/vpopmail is actually a symlink
to /var/vpopmail, with anything that has to refer to the vpopmail
directory using /home/vpopmail (I know it's not efficient, but the
guy who did that install had done almost all of it with vpopmail
living in /home/vpopmail when the boss told him he wanted the mail
stored on /var because it was a much bigger partition).  I mention
the symlink just in case it has a bearing on the issue.

I see from the changelog that in 5.3.17 a change was made in vcdb.c
to stop vadduser dumping core if the -s switch is used, and I suspect
that might have introduced a bug (although if I do use the -s switch
it still segfaults on me).

For now I've copied over the 5.2.1 versions of vadduser, vadddomain,
vmoduser and vdeluser (I don't know what vdeloldusers is for and there
doesn't seem to be any documentation about it) and hope that there are
no subtle incompatibilities.

Any ideas (better still, fixes) would be appreciated.

-- 
Paul Allen
Softflare Support




Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults

2003-08-21 Thread Michael Bowe
- Original Message - 
From: Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 6:48 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults



 I upgraded from 5.2.1 to 5.3.23 recently to get a fix for the bug in
vchkpw
 that stopped the authdaemond authentication working.  I found that
vadduser
 has a segmentation fault when I try to add a user (no switchs used).

Paul,
That bug was fixed in vpopmail-5.3.24
(available from http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail )
Michael.




Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults

2003-08-21 Thread Tom Collins
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:48  PM, Paul L. Allen wrote:
Any ideas (better still, fixes) would be appreciated.
Please use 5.3.24 from SourceForge 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail/.

Ken, please update http://inter7.com/develop.html to point to 
SourceForge for qmailadmin and vpopmail downloads.

--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester



RE: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults

2003-08-21 Thread Tom Predmore
Tom,
Wouldn't 5.2.2 be better to use rather then 5.3.24?

Thanks!
Tom

-Original Message-
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:13 PM
To: vpopmail list
Cc: Ken Jones
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults

On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:48  PM, Paul L. Allen wrote:
 Any ideas (better still, fixes) would be appreciated.

Please use 5.3.24 from SourceForge 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpopmail/.

Ken, please update http://inter7.com/develop.html to point to 
SourceForge for qmailadmin and vpopmail downloads.

--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester







Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults

2003-08-21 Thread Tom Collins
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 04:01  PM, Tom Predmore wrote:
	Wouldn't 5.2.2 be better to use rather then 5.3.24?
I'm personally still using 5.3.20 on my production machine (I haven't 
gotten around to upgrading it to 5.3.24 and recompiling courier, 
qmailadmin and qmail-smtp-chkuser).

Has anyone out there upgraded to 5.2.2 from 5.2.1?  I classified it as 
beta on the SourceForge site because we haven't tested it very 
thoroughly.  It is primarily made up of bugfixes ported from the 5.3 
series, but we could have introduced some new problems.

--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester



Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.23 vadduser segfaults

2003-08-21 Thread Evren Yurtesen
I think even though you introduced new problems, they are most probably in
newest features. I also use 5.3.20 but I didnt enable the features which
has just been invented in newest releases. This approach works great for
me. I didnt have a single bug related problem in 5.3.20. :)

Great work!

Evren

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Tom Collins wrote:

 On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 04:01  PM, Tom Predmore wrote:
  Wouldn't 5.2.2 be better to use rather then 5.3.24?
 
 I'm personally still using 5.3.20 on my production machine (I haven't 
 gotten around to upgrading it to 5.3.24 and recompiling courier, 
 qmailadmin and qmail-smtp-chkuser).
 
 Has anyone out there upgraded to 5.2.2 from 5.2.1?  I classified it as 
 beta on the SourceForge site because we haven't tested it very 
 thoroughly.  It is primarily made up of bugfixes ported from the 5.3 
 series, but we could have introduced some new problems.
 
 --
 Tom Collins
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://sniffter.com/ - info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester