Re: [vchkpw] Some experiences with 5.5

2009-06-10 Thread Harm van Tilborg
To get back on this, what info do you need to debug this behavior? -- Kind regards, Harm van Tilborg http://zeroxcool.net Harm van Tilborg wrote: Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harm van Tilborg wrote: Well, I haven't checked other vpopmail binaries,

Re: [vchkpw] Some experiences with 5.5

2009-06-02 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harm van Tilborg wrote: Well, I haven't checked other vpopmail binaries, since qmail was still off at that moment. But at least vusaged was rejecting to run because of it couldn't find libvpopmail.so. So I guess you haven't altered vusaged's

Re: [vchkpw] Some experiences with 5.5

2009-06-02 Thread Harm van Tilborg
Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harm van Tilborg wrote: Well, I haven't checked other vpopmail binaries, since qmail was still off at that moment. But at least vusaged was rejecting to run because of it couldn't find libvpopmail.so. So I guess you haven't

Re: [vchkpw] Some experiences with 5.5

2009-06-01 Thread Harm van Tilborg
Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harm van Tilborg wrote: Well almost everything did go smoothly, with the exception of things already pointed out by Wouter (i.e. libvpopmail.so was not known by the dynamic linker). I've added the -R flag to the linker and

[vchkpw] Some experiences with 5.5

2009-05-31 Thread Harm van Tilborg
Hi there (Matt especially :]), I finally had some time to play around with vpopmail 5.5.0. I've fetched today's SVN release from SF.net. Well almost everything did go smoothly, with the exception of things already pointed out by Wouter (i.e. libvpopmail.so was not known by the dynamic