Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-06 Thread matthew berardi
- Original Message - > From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "vpopmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 7:02 AM > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable > > > > On Wednesday, June 4,

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-06 Thread Raboo
thats why it should exist, it's to much job to do it manually ;) - Original Message - From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "vpopmail list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 7:02 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmai

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Tom Collins
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 03:48 PM, Raboo wrote: rename domains. If I use vdeldomain on a alias will it remove the domain or just the alias domain. If it deletes the domain you should add a feature to remove aliases It just removes the alias. Renaming a domain in vpopmail is a little more

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Raboo
ay, June 03, 2003 6:52 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable > Hi Folks, > > Does anyone have any code changes they would like to get into the > next release? I want to put together a new stable version 5.4. > Hopefully release it in the next few weeks. >

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Spork
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Moshe Jacobson wrote: > My (untested) fix is as follows. > > pnt = last + strlen(DOMAINS_DIR) + 2; > while( *(pnt+1) == '/' ) pnt+=2; > for( ; (*pnt && *pnt != '/' && j < 255); ++pnt, ++j ) { > email[j] = *pnt; > } > If we're not going to ever see cvs access for t

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Ken Jones
Sounds great. I'd leave the vauth_crypt() function in the pgsql.c code. I want to minimize the amount of testing needed. On Wednesday 04 June 2003 1:02 pm, Charles J. Boening wrote: > Ken, > > I'm working on some changes to the PostgreSQL code. I'll have them > hopefully by the end of the day o

RE: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Charles J. Boening
nal Message- From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:52 AM To: Jeff Garvas; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable I think we added a clear password field into the mysql vpopmail table. Ken Jones On Wednesday 04 June 20

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Ken Jones
7;t wait to see the new features > :) > > -Jeff > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:54 AM > > To: Moshe Jacobson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Dave Richardson - Lists
acobson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable Seems like a reasonable change. I put it in. Needs testing! Looks like we will start a series of devel releases to test these changes. I'll package one up end of day tomorrow. Ken Jones On Wednesday 04 June

RE: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Jeff Garvas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable > > > Seems like a reasonable change. > I put it in. Needs testing! > > Looks like we will start a series of devel releases to test > these changes. I'll package one up end of day tomorrow. &g

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Ken Jones
Seems like a reasonable change. I put it in. Needs testing! Looks like we will start a series of devel releases to test these changes. I'll package one up end of day tomorrow. Ken Jones On Wednesday 04 June 2003 9:37 am, Moshe Jacobson wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Ken Jones wrote: > > Does anyon

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Tom Collins
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 06:46 AM, matthew berardi wrote: it seems to me a far more permanent and scalable solution would be to select pw_name, pw_domain where pw_dir=DIR in the database. it is conceivable that [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s maildir be located in /some/where/else/joe/Maildir That's

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread matthew berardi
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:37:41 -0400 (EDT) Moshe Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Ken Jones wrote: > > Does anyone have any code changes they would like to get into the > > next release? I want to put together a new stable version 5.4. > > Hopefully release it in the next fe

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Moshe Jacobson
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Ken Jones wrote: > Does anyone have any code changes they would like to get into the > next release? I want to put together a new stable version 5.4. > Hopefully release it in the next few weeks. There seems to be a problem in th maildir_to_email() function in vdelivermail.c.

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-05 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 6:51 pm, Steve Fulton wrote: > > Hmm ... the only additional feature I could use, is the ability to set > > user accounts to expire on a certain date, like system accounts. > > Look at Freeside, Optigold ISP or Billmax. Each has that ability (and > more), the latter two are

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Jeremy Kister
r.com/jeremy/public_key.asc --- >-Original Message- > From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable > > > Hi Folks, > [..]

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Steve Fulton
> Hmm ... the only additional feature I could use, is the ability to set user accounts to expire on a certain date, like system accounts. Look at Freeside, Optigold ISP or Billmax. Each has that ability (and more), the latter two are not free. Yes, they do more than you probably want, but the ch

[vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Kari Suomela
Tuesday June 03 2003 11:52, Ken Jones wrote to All: KJ> Does anyone have any code changes they would like to get into the KJ> next release? I want to put together a new stable version 5.4. Hmm ... the only additional feature I could use, is the ability to set user accounts to expire on a cer

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
> Does anyone have any code changes they would like to get into the > next release? I want to put together a new stable version 5.4. > Hopefully release it in the next few weeks. Yes... is it possible to give valias some better help? Existing: valias: usage: [options] email_address options: -v (

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Tom Collins
On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 09:52 AM, Ken Jones wrote: Does anyone have any code changes they would like to get into the next release? I want to put together a new stable version 5.4. Hopefully release it in the next few weeks. Currenly the only change I have is to management of maildirsize files

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 12:25 pm, Spork wrote: > Ken, > > Just out of curiousity, what's the status with mysql limits? It seems > like there's code to read them, but no tools to write them. Unknown, I have not been working on that code. Ken > > Thanks, > > Charles > > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Ken Jo

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 11:54 am, Tom Collins wrote: > On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 09:52 AM, Ken Jones wrote: > > Does anyone have any code changes they would like to get into the > > next release? I want to put together a new stable version 5.4. > > Hopefully release it in the next few weeks. >

[vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Ken Jones
Hi Folks, Does anyone have any code changes they would like to get into the next release? I want to put together a new stable version 5.4. Hopefully release it in the next few weeks. Currenly the only change I have is to management of maildirsize files. There are some cases when the quota is cha

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Ken Jones
I think the changes I made might address the problem you are seeing. If the quota is changed for any reason, the vpopmail library will automatically rebuild the maildirsize file. I would be good to test if the .qmail file contains a local delivery line like: /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/user/

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Spork
Ken, Just out of curiousity, what's the status with mysql limits? It seems like there's code to read them, but no tools to write them. Thanks, Charles On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Ken Jones wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Does anyone have any code changes they would like to get into the > next release? I want

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Alfredo Perez
Ken, I posted a message a few weeks ago about the maildirsize patch by Bill Shupp. I found a bug, but I don't know where the problem is. After applying the patch qmail-pop3d and qmail-local will update the maildirsize file BUT if there is a .qmail file in the user maildir is will NOT be upd

Re: [vchkpw] Working towards vpopmail 5.4 stable

2003-06-04 Thread Alfredo Perez
Ken, Actually the test was made with a local delivery line, and local delivery line + &address line. And qmail-local is no updating the maildirsize file. I'd like to fix it myself, but I am not quite a good C developer Best Regards ! El mar, 03 de 06 de 2003 a las 13:01, Ken Jones esc