Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-13 Thread Alex Martin
Paul, What is the -t10 option below? I do not see it listed on http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html. Thanks, Alex (quote) anyway, here's what we use: /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -C \ -a whitelist.example.com \ -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org:\ Probable spam connection rejected. Details at

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-13 Thread Alex Martin
Sorry, I am a moron. from http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html: -t n: Change the 60-second timeout to n seconds. Thanks, Alex Alex Martin wrote: Paul, What is the -t10 option below? I do not see it listed on http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html. Thanks, Alex (quote) anyway, here's what we

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-13 Thread Rick van Vliet
(Fixed your top post) Alex Martin wrote: Alex Martin wrote: Paul, What is the -t10 option below? I do not see it listed on http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html. Thanks, Alex (quote) anyway, here's what we use: /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -C \ -a whitelist.example.com \ -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org:\

RE: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-13 Thread Remo Mattei
Yes it's there it is timeout Remo Mattei Network Security Engineer cell 801-808-unix email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Alex Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] RBLs Paul, What is the -t10

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-07 Thread Jasper Metselaar
Hello Paul, Here's my call to the rbl's. i prefer to give some info in the 'FU' response, to at least give them a clue where to start. we dropped spamcop a while back, as they were listing some sites that - while they may at times be sources of spam - are not in the main spam sites - such

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-07 Thread Michael Bowe
- Original Message - From: Jasper Metselaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -C \ -a whitelist.example.com \ -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org:\ Probable spam connection rejected. Details at http://www.spamhaus.org; \ -r list.dsbl.org:\ Probable spam connection rejected.

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-06 Thread Eduardo M. Bragatto
Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Monday 05 July 2004 08:44 pm, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote: What happens in the case that more than one RBL has the same blocked address? Which one actually blocks the smtp session? The one that answers first, or rblsmtpd waits until one to respond, before asking to

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-06 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
At 07:14 AM 7/6/2004, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote: Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Monday 05 July 2004 08:44 pm, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote: What happens in the case that more than one RBL has the same blocked address? Which one actually blocks the smtp session? The one that answers first, or

RE: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Mário Gamito
Hi, Just asking... do you put all those in qmail-smtpd, or do you use another method ? Regards, Mário Gamito -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 8:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] RBLs Hello!

RE: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread techs
Mario: We call rblsmtpd through tcpserver. This is the section of our tcpserver shell start script: /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 10 -r relays.ordb.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r dnsbl.njabl.org \ -r opm.blitzed.org -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r blackholes.mail-abuse.org Hope this answers your

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Eduardo M. Bragatto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 10 -r relays.ordb.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r dnsbl.njabl.org \ -r opm.blitzed.org -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r blackholes.mail-abuse.org What happens in the case that more than one RBL has the same blocked address? Which one actually blocks

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Joe Boyce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I'd like to know is what some of you other admins are using -- are there any we are missing that are effective? Has anyone found that one of the above is not providing any usefulness and could be dropped? We're currently using: bl.spamcop.net sbl.spamhaus.org

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Monday 05 July 2004 02:51 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I'd like to know is what some of you other admins are using -- are there any we are missing that are effective? Has anyone found that one of the above is not providing any usefulness and could be dropped? I use

Re: [vchkpw] RBLs

2004-07-05 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Monday 05 July 2004 08:44 pm, Eduardo M. Bragatto wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -t 10 -r relays.ordb.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r dnsbl.njabl.org \ -r opm.blitzed.org -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r blackholes.mail-abuse.org What happens in the case