Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Anton Butsyk
Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: For now only 11 connections to qmail: 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 53M Active, 53M Inact, 46M Wired, 59M Buf, 329M Free

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Rick Macdougall
Anton Butsyk wrote: Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: For now only 11 connections to qmail: 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 53M Active, 53M Inact, 46M Wire

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Anton Butsyk
Rick Macdougall wrote: Anton Butsyk wrote: Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: For now only 11 connections to qmail: 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 53M Ac

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-02 Thread Billy Newsom
Peter Palmreuther wrote: YMMD, but 'fopen()', a fast, hash-driven, seek (the way 'cdb' works) and a quick 'read' for a few bytes should be less overhead than a complete SQL query, including parsing the result. Even if your MySQL would run locally and accessed through UNIX-socket I'd expect it to

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Rick Macdougall
Anton Butsyk wrote: Thank you for advice. Script update_tmprsadh adds rsa512.pem, dh512.pem, dh1024.pem into /var/qmail/control dir. ( update_tmprsadh: lines: 12, 18, 24 chown vpopmail.qmail - incorrect for *BSD man: chown [-fhv] [-R [-H | -L | -P]] owner[:group] file ...) Hi, Yo

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-02 Thread Tom Collins
On Jul 2, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Billy Newsom wrote: If you aren't familiar with the Matt Simerson mysql patch, it was born because there can be major lookup problems with the cdb file, especially using POP before SMTP. Imagine the POP server populating the text file (and re-compiling the CDB) 10 t

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Anton Butsyk
Rick Macdougall wrote: Anton Butsyk wrote: Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: For now only 11 connections to qmail: 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 53M Ac

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-02 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
At 09:32 AM 7/2/2005, you wrote: Mysql has no problem with the above scenario, as it is designed for heavy accesses and changes to its tables. yup. my mysql server (which is on the vpopmail server, of course, so also handling httpd, imap, pop3 as well), which handles vpopmail, horde/IMP, twig

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-02 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
At 09:54 AM 7/2/2005, Tom Collins wrote: If I recall the thread though, the server in question is NOT set up for POP before SMTP. So, the cdb file is static and does not get updated. If it has 5 or so entries for the servers that will feed it, I would have to agree that a cdb lookup would to a

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-02 Thread Billy Newsom
Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: At 09:32 AM 7/2/2005, you wrote: there is no 'internal' port 25 traffic. My service provides email service for businesses. I'm not an ISP. all traffic to my servers is inbound from the global internet. I guess I was looking at your "customer" as having an SMTP rela

Re: [vchkpw] Re: block non-relay from remote to local?

2005-07-02 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
At 10:59 AM 7/2/2005, you wrote: Well, I can't say I didn't do the the same thing until recently. I chose my own secret port number to bypass a port 25 block. Blocking port 25 is becoming a major reality now. I was merely saying that there is a standard way to allow things to happen. You w

[vchkpw] Segmentation fault on one domain

2005-07-02 Thread joseph . clark
I am getting a segmentation fault when I try to do anything with one of the domains I am administering. [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./vadduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] qwerty Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./vdeluser [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error: User does not exist [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# grep qwerty