[vchkpw] Backfill Patch for dir_control

2009-01-14 Thread Manvendra Bhangui
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 08:22 -0600, Matt Brookings wrote: > Okay. I can definitely see how this would work. It is a reasonable > solution, and I'd be very interested to see a completed patch against > the CVS head. > I have completed the patch. How do I use CVS? I know very little of CVS. But a

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill Patch for dir_control

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manvendra Bhangui wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 08:22 -0600, Matt Brookings wrote: >> Okay. I can definitely see how this would work. It is a reasonable >> solution, and I'd be very interested to see a completed patch against >> the CVS head. >> >

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill Patch for dir_control

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Brookings wrote: > $ export CVSROOT=:pserver:vpopmail.cvs.sourceforge.net/cvsroot/vpopmail > $ cvs co vpopmail > > Generate a patch off that please. Actually, no need. Works fine on the HEAD version. I'll be updating HEAD in just a few moments

[vchkpw] Poll of sorts

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was wondering if anyone had any input on moving vpopmail to Subversion. After working with CVS for years, and then moving most of my development trees to Subversion, I've found it to be much easier to work with. I'd be very interested in seeing t

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill Patch for dir_control

2009-01-14 Thread Manvendra Bhangui
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Matt Brookings wrote: > Does your patch take into account that dir_control is occasionally inside a > database, or does it only work with the CDB backend? It's okay if it > doesn't > yet, but we definitely need it to in the future. The patch uses the dir_contro

Re: [vchkpw] Backfill Patch for dir_control

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manvendra Bhangui wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Matt Brookings > wrote: > > Does your patch take into account that dir_control is occasionally > inside a > database, or does it only work with the CDB ba

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

2009-01-14 Thread Dave Weiner
Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was wondering if anyone had any input on moving vpopmail to Subversion. After working with CVS for years, and then moving most of my development trees to Subversion, I've found it to be much easier to work with. I'd be ver

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

2009-01-14 Thread DAve
Matt Brookings wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was wondering if anyone had any input on moving vpopmail to Subversion. After working with CVS for years, and then moving most of my development trees to Subversion, I've found it to be much easier to work with. I'd be ver

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Weiner wrote: > Have you looked at/considered Git? I've just started using it, and I'm > finding that I like it's approach much better than CVS or Subversion. > It's website is at http://git-scm.com/ I'd like to keep vpopmail on Sourceforge. I

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 DAve wrote: > I've not used version control since prior to subversion, but I can say I > have not met any subversion users who would switch back to CVS. Subversion is definitely better, but I know we have a lot of people who at the very least lurk on

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

2009-01-14 Thread aledr
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Matt Brookings wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dave Weiner wrote: >> Have you looked at/considered Git? I've just started using it, and I'm >> finding that I like it's approach much better than CVS or Subversion. >> It's website is at

[vchkpw] Conversion from CVS to Subversion on SourceForge

2009-01-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've run some test conversions to Subversion and it works out pretty well, so if I haven't heard from anyone negatively in regards to moving the project to Subversion, I'll do this next Tuesday. - -- /* Matt BrookingsGnuPG Key D9414F70

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

2009-01-14 Thread Tom Collins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 14, 2009, at 7:55 AM, Matt Brookings wrote: I was wondering if anyone had any input on moving vpopmail to Subversion. After working with CVS for years, and then moving most of my development trees to Subversion, I've found it to be much e

Re: [vchkpw] Poll of sorts

2009-01-14 Thread Rick Widmer
Thanks for finding time to work on vpopmail! I wish I had more of it... Matt Brookings wrote: I'd be very interested in seeing the project moved over to Subversion. Does anyone have any input on this? I agree moving to Subversion is a good idea. I was planning on only doing bug fixes o