Hi Vince,
it looks like I'm continuosly using the wrong call, in these patch over
patch sequences.
Probably I should have used "byte_chr" (look starting from left) instead of
"byte_rchr" (look starting from right).
Sorry.
May you please confirm me if using the "byte_chr" call solves all probl
At 18/09/03 18/09/03 -0400, Vinnie wrote:
If I'm understanding this correctly (and definitely may not be, since I'm
just getting started messing around with TMDA), what this would do is
cause qmail-smtpd to:
1. look for an exact match of the recipient first - if an exact match is
found, hand of
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
This topic should have been already covered.
Please check if this "change" works for you.
Ciao,
Tonino
If the complete address does not exist, routine looks for "-"
characters, starting from left, and each time verifies if user exists,
until no "-" is found or use
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
This topic should have been already covered.
Please check if this "change" works for you.
Ciao,
Tonino
-
In such a case, I may suggest a very general and "to be adjiusted
manually" patch "
This topic should have been already covered.
Please check if this "change" works for you.
Ciao,
Tonino
-
In such a case, I may suggest a very general and "to be adjiusted manually"
patch "over the patch" like this.
Hello all,
I'm wondering if anybody has tried implementing tmda on their vpopmail
server(s) when qmail has been patched by chkusr.
It strikes me from initial looks that there may be a problem with incoming
emails destined for a tagged email address, if qmail's smtpd modified by
chkusr is looki
