Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Anton Butsyk
Rick Macdougall wrote: Anton Butsyk wrote: Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: For now only 11 connections to qmail: 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 53M Ac

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Rick Macdougall
Anton Butsyk wrote: Thank you for advice. Script update_tmprsadh adds rsa512.pem, dh512.pem, dh1024.pem into /var/qmail/control dir. ( update_tmprsadh: lines: 12, 18, 24 chown vpopmail.qmail - incorrect for *BSD man: chown [-fhv] [-R [-H | -L | -P]] owner[:group] file ...) Hi, Yo

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Anton Butsyk
Rick Macdougall wrote: Anton Butsyk wrote: Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: For now only 11 connections to qmail: 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 53M Ac

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Rick Macdougall
Anton Butsyk wrote: Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: For now only 11 connections to qmail: 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 53M Active, 53M Inact, 46M Wire

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-02 Thread Anton Butsyk
Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: For now only 11 connections to qmail: 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 53M Active, 53M Inact, 46M Wired, 59M Buf, 329M Free

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Tom Collins
If you've got TLS, did you do the following steps (copied from Shupp's Toaster): qmailctl stop make cert # enter your company's information make tmprsadh # NOTE: This may take a LONG time # now add the followowing line to your crontab via `crontab -e` to update these temp keys each night 01

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 500 \ > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -DURl $ME > -x $QMAIL/control/qmail-smtpd.cdb -u "qmaild" 0 smtp \ > /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r bl.spamcop.net \ > -rlist.dsbl.org \ > -rcbl.abuseat.org \ > $QMAIL/bin/qmail-smtpd

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 13:02 -0500, DAve wrote: > > #!/bin/sh > > exec 2>&1 > > QMAIL="/var/qmail" > > ME=$(head -1 $QMAIL/control/me) > > PATH="$QMAIL/bin:$PATH" > > USER=${USER:="qmaild"} > > > > exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 500 \ > > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -DURl $ME > > -x$QMAI

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread DAve
Anton Butsyk wrote: Hi list! I've setup netqmail (http://qmail.org/netqmail/) with toaster patch (http://shupp.com/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2) on FreeBSD 5.4 with vpopmail (check user patch), courier-imap, sqwebmail (full toaster but without virus scanner at all) for network about 3k

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: > For now only 11 connections to qmail: > > 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping > CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% > idle > Mem: 53M Active, 53M Inact, 46M Wired, 59M Buf, 329M Free > Swap: 1024M To

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Anton Butsyk
Shane Chrisp wrote: On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 00:19 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: Hi list! Is it actually the Qmail processes that are using the CPU or is it something else. Whats showing up in top or iostat/vmstat etc. That will at

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Anton Butsyk
Shane Chrisp wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: Hi list! everything work but 40 qmail-smtpd processes (or less nevermind) eat my CPU time up to 100 % (CPU states: 94.5% user, 0.0% nice, 3.1% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle) Is it actually the Qmail p

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 00:19 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: > Hi list! > Is it actually the Qmail processes that are using the CPU or is it > something else. Whats showing up in top or iostat/vmstat etc. That will > at least give you a clue where

Re: [vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote: Hi list! > everything work but 40 qmail-smtpd processes (or less nevermind) eat my > CPU time up to 100 % > (CPU states: 94.5% user, 0.0% nice, 3.1% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0% > idle) > Is it actually the Qmail processes that are using

[vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Anton Butsyk
Hi list! I've setup netqmail (http://qmail.org/netqmail/) with toaster patch (http://shupp.com/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2) on FreeBSD 5.4 with vpopmail (check user patch), courier-imap, sqwebmail (full toaster but without virus scanner at all) for network about 3k users. This is qmail-

[vchkpw] hi CPU usage

2005-07-01 Thread Anton Butsyk
Hi list! I've setup netqmail (http://qmail.org/netqmail/) with toaster patch (http://shupp.com/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2) on FreeBSD 5.4 with vpopmail (check user patch), courier-imap, sqwebmail (full toaster but without virus scanner at all) for network about 3k users. This is qmail-