[vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Julien Escario
Hello, I'm managing an email server that recently started to refuse inbound mail to a few domains. I checked almost everything and the declaration seems to be exactly the same for others domains. For example : postmas...@restaurantlatuilerie.fr: 195.200.217.34 does not like recipient.

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: Hello, I'm managing an email server that recently started to refuse inbound mail to a few domains. I checked almost everything and the declaration seems to be exactly the same for others domains. For example :

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Julien Escario
Le 09/09/2010 13:45, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: Did you make ANY change in software recently? No. The server only rebooted but some times ago ... What does say your virtualdomains? restaurantlatuilerie.fr:restaurantlatuilerie.fr Same for

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Il 09/09/2010 15:26, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 13:45, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: Did you make ANY change in software recently? No. The server only rebooted but some times ago ... What does say your virtualdomains?

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Julien Escario
Le 09/09/2010 15:46, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 15:26, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 13:45, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: You could setup a version of qmail-smtpd with chkuser debug on, and run it on a different

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Il 09/09/2010 16:16, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 15:46, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 15:26, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 13:45, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 11:50, Julien Escario ha scritto: You could setup a version of qmail-smtpd

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2010 04:50 AM, Julien Escario wrote: No mysql connection error. Check to be sure your MySQL server information in ~vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql works, and that the server is responsive to queries. User can authenticate in the webmail

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Julien Escario
Le 09/09/2010 16:32, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 16:16, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 15:46, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : Il 09/09/2010 15:26, Julien Escario ha scritto: Le 09/09/2010 13:45, Tonix (Antonio Nati) a écrit : You have a problem with chkuser

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Julien Escario
Le 09/09/2010 16:33, Matt Brookings a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2010 04:50 AM, Julien Escario wrote: No mysql connection error. Check to be sure your MySQL server information in ~vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql works, and that the server is responsive to

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2010 09:44 AM, Julien Escario wrote: I don't know exactly what to check for libraries. I just installed the debian package : ps auwx | grep mysql I dont think so. delete is what I want to remove those fake bounces that spammers are

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2010 09:45 AM, Julien Escario wrote: On 09/09/2010 04:50 AM, Julien Escario wrote: No mysql connection error. Check to be sure your MySQL server information in ~vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql works, and that the server is responsive to

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Julien Escario
Le 09/09/2010 16:47, Matt Brookings a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2010 09:44 AM, Julien Escario wrote: I don't know exactly what to check for libraries. I just installed the debian package : ps auwx | grep mysql Nothing special : root 678 0.0 0.0

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox here by that name (chkuser) ?

2010-09-09 Thread Julien Escario
Le 09/09/2010 16:50, Matt Brookings a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2010 09:45 AM, Julien Escario wrote: On 09/09/2010 04:50 AM, Julien Escario wrote: No mysql connection error. Check to be sure your MySQL server information in ~vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql

[vchkpw] Re: Mailbox groups added to 5.5 branch

2009-08-14 Thread Matt Brookings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Brookings wrote: * This code has been in production for several years under heavy use but the the code was written for an older version of vpopmail Er, this is incorrect. It was written for an old version of qmailadmin. I've

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread Rakesh Sharma
Hi All, As bounce says user not created on vpopnmail. --Rakesh Sharma On Tuesday 27 May 2008 11:13:49 am kalin m wrote: cant figure this out freebsd 7. messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] fail with: May 26 22:55:44 host qmail: 1211856944.665478 delivery 1: failure:

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread kalin m
not sure if i follow i did the users with: /home/vpopmail/bin/vadduser [EMAIL PROTECTED] thay both appear in domain.com's vpasswd, besides postmaster. it's below.../usr/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com below:... Rakesh Sharma wrote: Hi All, As bounce says user not created

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread Bob Hutchinson
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 06:43, kalin m wrote: cant figure this out freebsd 7. messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] fail with: May 26 22:55:44 host qmail: 1211856944.665478 delivery 1: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ what is in qmail/users/assign?

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread Boris Pavlov
do [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail? edi. !DSPAM:483bbc0e32358322360014!

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread kalin m
domain.com-:domain.com:1010:1003:/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com:-:: Bob Hutchinson wrote: On Tuesday 27 May 2008 06:43, kalin m wrote: cant figure this out freebsd 7. messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] fail with: May 26 22:55:44 host qmail: 1211856944.665478

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread kalin m
no: May 27 09:05:25 machine qmail: 1211893525.434591 info msg 353625: bytes 714 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 6000 uid 1010 May 27 09:05:25 machine qmail: 1211893525.436006 starting delivery 7: msg 353625 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] May 27 09:05:25 machine qmail: 1211893525.436045 status: local

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread Dvorkin Dmitry
check permissions and contents: # ls -l итого 20 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6964 2008-04-04 19:55 assign -rw--- 1 root root 0 2007-06-11 19:19 assign.lock -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10904 2008-04-04 19:55 cdb # pwd /var/qmail/users # head -n 1 ./assign

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread Bob Hutchinson
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 16:46, kalin m wrote: domain.com-:domain.com:1010:1003:/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com:-:: Add + at start of line Bob Hutchinson wrote: On Tuesday 27 May 2008 06:43, kalin m wrote: cant figure this out freebsd 7. messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread kalin m
it has it sorry... +domain.com-:domain.com:1010:1003:/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com:-:: i omitted it my bad Bob Hutchinson wrote: On Tuesday 27 May 2008 16:46, kalin m wrote: domain.com-:domain.com:1010:1003:/home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com:-:: Add + at start of

[vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-26 Thread kalin m
cant figure this out freebsd 7. messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] fail with: May 26 22:55:44 host qmail: 1211856944.665478 delivery 1: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/ qmail control: -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail3 May 26 20:47

Re: [vchkpw] sendmail mailbox conversion

2005-07-27 Thread Bob Hutchinson
On Wednesday 27 Jul 2005 03:51, suranga wrote: *** No virus was detected in the attachment no filename No virus was detected in the attachment no filename Your mail has been scanned by Janashakthi InterScan MSS. *** Dear qmail friends, Please can

RE: [vchkpw] sendmail mailbox conversion

2005-07-27 Thread Rizwan Iqbal Malik
: [vchkpw] sendmail mailbox conversion On Wednesday 27 Jul 2005 03:51, suranga wrote: *** No virus was detected in the attachment no filename No virus was detected in the attachment no filename Your mail has been scanned by Janashakthi InterScan MSS

Re: [vchkpw] sendmail mailbox conversion

2005-07-27 Thread Bob Hutchinson
://untroubled.org/mbox2maildir Regards, Rizwan Iqbal Malik -Original Message- From: Bob Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 1:49 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] sendmail mailbox conversion On Wednesday 27 Jul 2005 03:51, suranga wrote

Re: [vchkpw] sendmail mailbox conversion

2005-07-27 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 03:19 am, Rizwan Iqbal Malik wrote: Dear bob , Mbox2maildir is still not properly developed.Many issues arise in the conversion atleast they did for me. I've used it countless times without any issues. Also, if you had issues, you certainly haven't brought them up

Re: [vchkpw] sendmail mailbox conversion

2005-07-27 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 04:41 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Wednesday 27 July 2005 03:19 am, Rizwan Iqbal Malik wrote: Dear bob , Mbox2maildir is still not properly developed.Many issues arise in the conversion atleast they did for me. I've used it countless times without any issues.

[vchkpw] sendmail mailbox conversion

2005-07-26 Thread suranga
*** No virus was detected in the attachment no filename No virus was detected in the attachment no filename Your mail has been scanned by Janashakthi InterScan MSS. *** Dear qmailfriends, Please can you send me the steps ofhow tomigrate sendmail mail

[vchkpw] Clear mailbox

2004-03-17 Thread Patrick Paysant
Hello, In the process to install a new qmail/vpopmail server, I have a problem with some mail that arrives before any spam filter is installed. There is a lot of mailboxes and in each I can see some mail. I check some of them : it's only spam. # l

RE: [vchkpw] Clear mailbox

2004-03-17 Thread Shane Chrisp
Hello, In the process to install a new qmail/vpopmail server, I have a problem with some mail that arrives before any spam filter is installed. There is a lot of mailboxes and in each I can see some mail. I check some of them : it's only spam. # l

RE: [vchkpw] Clear mailbox

2004-03-17 Thread Patrick Paysant
You can just rm the files from the Maildir. Once they have reached the users Maildir, qmail is finished with them. Is there no problem with the Maildir/maildirsize file ? -- Patrick

RE: [vchkpw] Clear mailbox

2004-03-17 Thread Shane Chrisp
Delete the maildir file as well and it will be recreated. Shane -Original Message- From: Patrick Paysant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2004 8:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Clear mailbox You can just rm the files from the Maildir. Once

RE: [vchkpw] Clear mailbox

2004-03-17 Thread Patrick Paysant
Delete the maildir file as well and it will be recreated. Ok, many thanks -- Patrick

RE: [vchkpw] per mailbox virus scan + spamassasssin

2003-10-23 Thread Neo Wee Teck
-Original Message- From: Björn Hahnefeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 4:17 PM To: 'Neo Wee Teck' Subject: AW: [vchkpw] per mailbox virus scan + spamassasssin Do you have tipps for installing spamassassin for me? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Neo Wee Teck [mailto

RE: [vchkpw] per mailbox virus scan + spamassasssin

2003-10-23 Thread Neo Wee Teck
, 2003 4:54 PM To: 'Neo Wee Teck' Subject: AW: [vchkpw] per mailbox virus scan + spamassasssin Is that all? And it works then together with qmail, vpopmail etc. without any other options? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Neo Wee Teck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Oktober

RE: [vchkpw] per mailbox virus scan + spamassasssin

2003-10-23 Thread Neo Wee Teck
Your path for spamd/spamc might be different from mine ;) It is either /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin -Original Message- From: Neo Wee Teck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [vchkpw] per mailbox virus scan + spamassasssin

[vchkpw] Invalid mailbox handling / bouncing bounce handling

2002-08-30 Thread Jan Knepper
Hi, this has probably been asked several times, but... It is possible to reject a SMTP connection for a mailbox that does not exists? What is the best way to deal with a bounce than bounced... Happens expecially with the vacation solution processing spam... It replies to an address that does

Re: [vchkpw] Invalid mailbox handling / bouncing bounce handling

2002-08-30 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Jan, On Friday, August 30, 2002 at 8:33:10 AM you wrote: It is possible to reject a SMTP connection for a mailbox that does not exists? Using qmail? No. Maybe some day there'll be a patch that can be used for a limited number of scenarios like this, but AFAIK there's none yet. What

Re: [vchkpw] Invalid mailbox handling / bouncing bounce handling

2002-08-30 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 30/08/2002 30/08/2002 -0400, Jan Knepper wrote: Hi, this has probably been asked several times, but... It is possible to reject a SMTP connection for a mailbox that does not exists? Yes, the patch is at www.interazioni.it/qmail, specifically made for vpopmail. This patch rejects SMTP