Tom Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, 1 February 2004 3:26 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [vchkpw] possible to refine local domains to
>local addresses?
>
>On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 21:58, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>
>> Actually what I see are double bounces,
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 21:58, Kurt Bigler wrote:
> Actually what I see are double bounces, and I make the inference about what
> would have happenned if the from address of the original message accepted by
> my SMTP had actually existed. Please correct me if that inference is wrong.
Combining the
on 1/31/04 9:46 PM, Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 23:39, Kurt Bigler wrote:
>> I just discovered a phenomenon that is probably familiar to many of you:
>> the fact that spammers (or viruses) can relay through my server because of
>> its accepted domains (domains
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 23:39, Kurt Bigler wrote:
> I just discovered a phenomenon that is probably familiar to many of you:
> the fact that spammers (or viruses) can relay through my server because of
> its accepted domains (domains at which my server hosts pop accounts), simply
> by forging a bad a
I just discovered a phenomenon that is probably familiar to many of you:
the fact that spammers (or viruses) can relay through my server because of
its accepted domains (domains at which my server hosts pop accounts), simply
by forging a bad address at one of the accepted domains and allowing the
r
