Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
you´re right all right - Original Message - From: Eduardo M. Bragatto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 6:53 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail? Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: try http://www.uebimiau.org Do not try it. I've being using it for two years and I'm now looking for another webmail. Uebimiau is easy to install/configure, do not depend on IMAP (it uses POP3) and brings Apache to 99% of CPU load when (even if it's just a few) users with large mailboxes log in. I think it happens because Uebimiau (like every pop3 client) after downloading the message, writes it to the disk. As a result, my webserver keeps thousands of small files on the disk and it has to scan every single file to get informations like subject when the user log in. If it were a IMAP client it shouldn't happen, because the message wouldn't have to be downloaded to give a list of messages to the user (am I right here?). Best regards, Eduardo M. Bragatto.
RE: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
Hi, Try squirrelmail. It has more features, a lot of plugins and it is easy to restyle. But if features that you want, IMP is the answer. Take no substitutes. But it's a pain in the ass to restyle. Even better: tell your users that sqwebmail may be ugly, but it's by far the most secure and reliable. Just my 2 cents of euro, Mário Gamito -Original Message- From: Edilmar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 10:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail? Hi, I have used Netqmail 1.05 + SMTP Auth + Vpopmail 5.4.0 + SQWebmail 4.0.5. But my users have talked about changing the webmail, mainly because layout limitations and other resources like virtual disk, support online for many languages, instant messages when new emails are received, etc. I look at SQuirelmail but it needs IMAP and I'd not like to install a new service. I look also at Openwebmail but I didn't find a distribution integrated with QMail/VPopmail. Is there one? Or are there other webmails more advanced than SQWebmail? Thanks,
Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 03:59 pm, Edilmar wrote: I have used Netqmail 1.05 + SMTP Auth + Vpopmail 5.4.0 + SQWebmail 4.0.5. But my users have talked about changing the webmail, mainly because layout limitations and other resources like virtual disk, support online for many languages, instant messages when new emails are received, etc. I look at SQuirelmail but it needs IMAP and I'd not like to install a new service. well, if you look around, you'll soon find that almost every webmail application out there is an imap client. bincimap (http://www.bincimap.org) and courier-imap (http://www.courier-mta.org/imap) are not difficult to set up (in fact, sqwebmail and courier-imap are very very close in codebase). I look also at Openwebmail but I didn't find a distribution integrated with QMail/VPopmail. Is there one? not likely. omail-webmail might work, but it's a PITA to set up and I don't know if it works with vpopmail (however, I do know that it does work with vmailmgr, as I used to have it set up on my old box) Or are there other webmails more advanced than SQWebmail? probably. Most of them are imap clients. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 847.492.0470 int'l kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
tisdagen den 27 juli 2004 22.59 skrev Edilmar: Hi, I have used Netqmail 1.05 + SMTP Auth + Vpopmail 5.4.0 + SQWebmail 4.0.5. But my users have talked about changing the webmail, mainly because layout limitations and other resources like virtual disk, support online for many languages, instant messages when new emails are received, etc. I look at SQuirelmail but it needs IMAP and I'd not like to install a new service. I look also at Openwebmail but I didn't find a distribution integrated with QMail/VPopmail. Is there one? Or are there other webmails more advanced than SQWebmail? Thanks, I have recently migrated from cdb to mysql and sqwebmail to squirrelmail. Stuff like address books and prefs from sqwebmail is also in mysql. I have scripts for that if you like. With this setup you can easily spread the load into different web and sql servers, etc. courier-imap is a good imap server, use it. I also have the relay hosts in mysql too, that tcpserver can use. (the pop-before-smtp solution). Though, this system is _not_ in production yet it looks promising... We're a small ISP, that's why I chose this path. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
try http://www.uebimiau.org - Original Message - From: Edilmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:59 PM Subject: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail? Hi, I have used Netqmail 1.05 + SMTP Auth + Vpopmail 5.4.0 + SQWebmail 4.0.5. But my users have talked about changing the webmail, mainly because layout limitations and other resources like virtual disk, support online for many languages, instant messages when new emails are received, etc. I look at SQuirelmail but it needs IMAP and I'd not like to install a new service. I look also at Openwebmail but I didn't find a distribution integrated with QMail/VPopmail. Is there one? Or are there other webmails more advanced than SQWebmail? Thanks,
Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
Just to add chuck another item into the melting pot... ;-) I look at SQuirelmail but it needs IMAP and I'd not like to install a new service. Try http://ilohamail.org, has it's own integral IMAP should you decide to try it. Works directly with Qmail/ Vpopmail and the source is there for you to meddle with as well. I look also at Openwebmail but I didn't find a distribution integrated with QMail/VPopmail. Is there one? I've tried quite a few interfaces out there, including Openwebmail, all of which seem to overlay quite well except are maybe just a wee bit fiddly to install from source. Or are there other webmails more advanced than SQWebmail? I'd say, lots. You are spoilt for choice. ;-) Cheers, Chris. -- __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: try http://www.uebimiau.org Do not try it. I've being using it for two years and I'm now looking for another webmail. Uebimiau is easy to install/configure, do not depend on IMAP (it uses POP3) and brings Apache to 99% of CPU load when (even if it's just a few) users with large mailboxes log in. I think it happens because Uebimiau (like every pop3 client) after downloading the message, writes it to the disk. As a result, my webserver keeps thousands of small files on the disk and it has to scan every single file to get informations like subject when the user log in. If it were a IMAP client it shouldn't happen, because the message wouldn't have to be downloaded to give a list of messages to the user (am I right here?). Best regards, Eduardo M. Bragatto.
Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail?
try http://hastymail.sourceforge.net/ i think better than uebimiau - Original Message - From: Eduardo M. Bragatto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:53 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] What's the better Webmail for Vpopmail? Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: try http://www.uebimiau.org Do not try it. I've being using it for two years and I'm now looking for another webmail. Uebimiau is easy to install/configure, do not depend on IMAP (it uses POP3) and brings Apache to 99% of CPU load when (even if it's just a few) users with large mailboxes log in. I think it happens because Uebimiau (like every pop3 client) after downloading the message, writes it to the disk. As a result, my webserver keeps thousands of small files on the disk and it has to scan every single file to get informations like subject when the user log in. If it were a IMAP client it shouldn't happen, because the message wouldn't have to be downloaded to give a list of messages to the user (am I right here?). Best regards, Eduardo M. Bragatto.
