Re: [vchkpw] Difference between +OK and +OK+

2004-04-07 Thread Ken Jones
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 12:44 am, Rick Widmer wrote: So, is it safe to assume that +OK means a command was accepted, and no data will be returned, and +OK+ means a that data follows? Yes. What do you think about that idea. It should make it easier to parse the return. Currently it always

Re: [vchkpw] Difference between +OK and +OK+

2004-04-07 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
- Original Message - From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wednesday 07 April 2004 12:44 am, Rick Widmer wrote: So, is it safe to assume that +OK means a command was accepted, and no data will be returned, and +OK+ means a that data follows? Yes. What do you think about that idea.

Re: [vchkpw] Difference between +OK and +OK+

2004-04-07 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote: I'll upload the code into cvs today so you can get the latest code from there. Just out of curiousity, does this build against vpopmail 5.3.x or 5.4.x? Thanks, Charles Ken

Re: [vchkpw] Difference between +OK and +OK+

2004-04-07 Thread Rick Macdougall
Charles Sprickman wrote: On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Ken Jones wrote: Just out of curiousity, does this build against vpopmail 5.3.x or 5.4.x? Hi, No, but it will work against a 5.3.x or a 5.4.x production server. I compiled the 5.2.2 version and then just used the vpopmaild binary. Regards, Rick