Re: [vchkpw] possible to refine local domains to local addresses?

2004-02-01 Thread Tom Jackson
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 21:58, Kurt Bigler wrote: Actually what I see are double bounces, and I make the inference about what would have happenned if the from address of the original message accepted by my SMTP had actually existed. Please correct me if that inference is wrong. Combining the

RE: [vchkpw] possible to refine local domains to local addresses?

2004-02-01 Thread Shane Chrisp
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 1 February 2004 3:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] possible to refine local domains to local addresses? On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 21:58, Kurt Bigler wrote: Actually what I see are double bounces, and I make the inference about what would have

Re: [vchkpw] possible to refine local domains to local addresses?

2004-01-31 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 23:39, Kurt Bigler wrote: I just discovered a phenomenon that is probably familiar to many of you: the fact that spammers (or viruses) can relay through my server because of its accepted domains (domains at which my server hosts pop accounts), simply by forging a bad

Re: [vchkpw] possible to refine local domains to local addresses?

2004-01-31 Thread Kurt Bigler
on 1/31/04 9:46 PM, Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 23:39, Kurt Bigler wrote: I just discovered a phenomenon that is probably familiar to many of you: the fact that spammers (or viruses) can relay through my server because of its accepted domains (domains at