Re: dvcs-autosync notes after first use

2012-09-01 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am Donnerstag, 30. August 2012, 17:20:15 schrieb Thomas Koch: > I just installed and tryied dvcs-autosync 0.5 from Debian. Is anybody > actively > using and developing this? I am, but not actively at the moment. The TODO list for dvcs-autosync is longer than I would like it to be, but unfortuna

Re: status of sharebox-fs?

2012-05-24 Thread René Mayrhofer
On 2012-05-23 21:17, Joey Hess wrote: > No, I punted on it. The inotify managed directory will behave > differently/annoyingly when the user tries to modify files. This > certianly doesn't perfectly cover every use case, but I feel it's an > ok tradeoff, you can get used to that behavior. There is

Re: dvcs-autosync+git is broken by design

2012-03-05 Thread René Mayrhofer
On 03/04/2012 11:39 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: addcmd = echo "New untracked file %s" Am I right in thinking that in this case, there is no synchronisation issue to worry about? synchronisation issue? what do you mean? Synchronisation as in, race conditions between manual operations on the files

Re: DVCS-Autosync: syncmethod = none

2011-10-25 Thread René Mayrhofer
On 24.10.2011 23:50, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: I changed the syncmethod to none, since I dont want to use Jabber. I thought, that autosync will check every xx minutes for changes on the git server, but nothing happens. Is it not implemented? I was used to it with sparkleshare and it is quite handy.

Re: More DVCS breakage

2011-05-24 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am 2011-05-18 13:19, schrieb Sebastian Spaeth: > Known? > > Sorry, no patch to fix it this time: > > INFO:root:You pressed Ctrl+C, exiting gracefully! > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "./dvcs-autosync", line 630, in > time.sleep(10) > File "./dvcs-autosync", line 482, in signa

Re: Python script for automatic synchronization based on inotify

2011-03-23 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2011, um 09:33:37 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:00:27 +0100 > martin f krafft wrote: > > > also sprach Dieter Plaetinck [2011.03.20.1235 > > +0100]: > > > oh, one more thing. > > > you can query the current branch in a pure-python way, by > > > reading

Re: Python script for automatic synchronization based on inotify

2011-03-21 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am Sonntag, 20. März 2011, um 12:26:36 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > Either way I don't think we should query the remote for "what do you have", > frankly we shouldn't care. we only care about pushing (explicitly enough) > the thing that we need to push. Agreed. > If you only want to support a m

Re: Python script for automatic synchronization based on inotify

2011-03-20 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am Freitag, 18. März 2011, 22:59:07 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > I found sparkleshare very disappointing. I spent more time reporting bugs > for all kinds of stupid things then actually using the software.. I got it to > sync 1 file then it stopped and I gave up. > https://github.com/hbons/Sparkl

Re: Python script for automatic synchronization based on inotify

2011-03-19 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am Samstag, 19. März 2011, 20:33:08 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > that person was me. as you can see, i already have a bunch of patches queued > up in a pull request on gitorious. > i'll treat it as a git exercise for myself to port my patches to the new > history branch. I already saw the patche

Re: Python script for automatic synchronization based on inotify

2011-03-19 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am Dienstag, 15. März 2011, 10:05:17 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:53:44 -0500 > "Chanoch (Ken) Bloom" wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 08:53:03PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > > > On 14.03.2011 17:15, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > > >why are many code changes committed as

Re: Python script for automatic synchronization based on inotify

2011-03-15 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am 2011-03-14 21:53, schrieb Chanoch (Ken) Bloom: > First, run `git filter-branch` with the `--prune-empty` option to get > rid of the empty commits that used to contain only changes to the .pyc > file. I think I already did that, but will need to double-check. > Second, rewriting the history to b

Re: Python script for automatic synchronization based on inotify

2011-03-14 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am 2011-03-12 21:25, schrieb seanh: > This sounds great! One thought: I think in many use-cases lots of small > changes to a file will be saved one after another and then no changes > for a while, or else lots of files will be changed in a short time and > then no changes for a while. It sounds lik

Re: Python script for automatic synchronization based on inotify

2011-03-14 Thread René Mayrhofer
Am 2011-03-13 17:21, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > very cool project. Thanks ;) > 1) about the xmpp stuff. can i use my jabber.org account (which I use to IM) > for this? can i have multiple systems log in to that? will that cause IM's > from friends to get sent to those jabberbots instead of my

Python script for automatic synchronization based on inotify

2011-03-10 Thread René Mayrhofer
Hi everybody, So far, I was only an avid lurker on this list, but have not yet found time to contribute myself. With this email, I hope to change this and attach a preview of a Python script/daemon that I have been meaning to release for ages, but haven't gotten around to do so. In short, it do