Hi all,
I am using several local repos and one common bare remote. Said remote
is origin for all other repos and meant as a central point of
distribution.
A few issues with this setup:
* I can not run git annex fsck (this might be addressed by Joey in code)
* git annex status does not know
Hi all,
my take at vcsh, ending in a from-scratch re-implementation of
madduck's fake bare git repo, is ready for general consumption.
It's trivial to set up thanks to a template repo you can clone from.
If anyone has any questions, ask. If I managed to pique your interest,
have a look at it.
Also, bare git annex repos only know about themselves and not other
repos. Again, this is somewhat expected, but still.
The more I think about it, the more do I think that a combination of
object stores of bare non-bare repos makes sense. Only need to
figure out the cleanest way to meld bup into
Richard Hartmann wrote:
* git annex status does not know about the global annex keys size
I think this could be fixed fairly easily using the existing code to
list the keys in a non-checked out git branch.
One thing I have been pondering is to create a local clone of the bare
repo and
Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 18:31, Joey Hess j...@kitenet.net wrote:
I think this could be fixed fairly easily using the existing code to
list the keys in a non-checked out git branch.
Sounds good. Would that cover the other noted limitations, as well?
Unsure what
Richard Hartmann wrote:
The problem is that, afaik, I can't have it as a bare special remote.
It would be very weird to have a bup repository that is *not* bare.
The use case is that I built hosted a server for backups and backups
only. As origin, it's used to sync git state between all
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 21:21, Joey Hess j...@kitenet.net wrote:
It would be very weird to have a bup repository that is *not* bare.
True; what I meant was the merged bup annex, indeed.
As I said, it's probably possible to use a branch of the same repository
for bup as for git-annex, but
Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 21:21, Joey Hess j...@kitenet.net wrote:
It would be very weird to have a bup repository that is *not* bare.
True; what I meant was the merged bup annex, indeed.
As I said, it's probably possible to use a branch of the same repository
