On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 15:30, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Maybe rsync for that, then bup to back it up, is the best
> option.
Sounds like reinventing git-annex, to me.
Richard
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/l
Sean Whitton wrote:
> I was taking a look at how git-annex handles modifying files, which I
> haven’t used before; would this actually work well—wouldn’t you need
> to use be continually using git annex unused and pulling in new
> versions on the file on your other machines?
I'd just add one mailb
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 02:22:11PM +0200, Valodim Skywalker wrote:
> Sounds like a job for bup. Have you considered that?
>
> https://github.com/apenwarr/bup
The problem is that I want to be able to keep the mail archive synced
on two local non-backup machines, as well as remotely in some kind of
Sounds like a job for bup. Have you considered that?
https://github.com/apenwarr/bup
- V
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 05:12:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I archive my mail to compressed mboxes, one per month. If I used maildir
> it'd flirt with running out of inodes or exceeding the number of files
> git can comfortably scale to. And it would probably waste rather a lot
> of space.
Sean Whitton wrote:
> 2) I currently split my e-mail into my current inbox and folders, a
> few hundred megabytes, and 5GB of archives removed by the archivemail
> script. It would be much more useful to have my archives stored
> locally, for easier searching, backed up to S3 somehow. Anyone got
