On Mon, Sep 29 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:44:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Arguably, we should all use debhelper and use quilt+subversion,
>> to make it easier for more people to follow the package. And, really,
>> we should all be using rpm or
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:44:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Arguably, we should all use debhelper and use quilt+subversion,
> to make it easier for more people to follow the package. And, really,
> we should all be using rpm or tar.gz. (More people use subversion than
> do unders
On Mon, Sep 29 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.29.1908 +0200]:
>> My goal is not to have a patch series in a Debian package. My goal
>> is to be able to develop software that is packaged for Debian --
>
> This argument has been taken ad infi
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.29.1908 +0200]:
> My goal is not to have a patch series in a Debian package. My goal
> is to be able to develop software that is packaged for Debian --
This argument has been taken ad infinitum on debian-devel. The idea
of a patch series in
On Mon, Sep 29 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.29.1745 +0200]:
>> I don't really want to add ./debian/patches directory to keep
>> track of previous patch series;
>
> Well, it is the only truly-accepted, VCS-agnostic way to have
> a
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.29.1745 +0200]:
> I don't really want to add ./debian/patches directory to keep
> track of previous patch series;
Well, it is the only truly-accepted, VCS-agnostic way to have
a patch series in a Debian package, so why not?
> and
On Sun, Sep 28 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Stéphane Glondu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.28.1158 +0200]:
>> I've read topgit's README.source. I am currently experimenting with it.
>> Is there any other source package using topgit?
>
> None that I know of. It'll be hard to come up wit
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:01:25PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Can git-buildpackage use information stored in the repository, such
> as which branch to build from? It would be handy to be able to tell
> people just to use git-buildpackage without expecting them to pass
> the right branch name.
also sprach Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.29.1053 +0200]:
> > If git-buildpackage expects master, then it is inflexible; you
> > should be able to tell it to build from build.
> git-buildpackage builds from any branch you tell it to.
I will have to look at git-buildpackage one of thes
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:43:18AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
[..snip..]
> If git-buildpackage expects master, then it is inflexible; you
> should be able to tell it to build from build.
git-buildpackage builds from any branch you tell it to.
-- Guido
_
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 07:50:17AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> In a way that we could run this over the entire archive to produce
> statistics? Well, all Vcs-Git packages anyway...?
Yes.
> > It would be better to avoid adding that behavior to "debcheckout -p"
> > though, as currently that fla
11 matches
Mail list logo
