Sorry about my other reply which I accidentally sent without editing.
VDR User wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Absolutely, since (if this insanity really happens) it means that
>> projects like VDR are effectively dead in the water :(
>
> Why do you believe that?
>
VDR User wrote:
On 3/15/07, Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Absolutely, since (if this insanity really happens) it means that
projects like VDR are effectively dead in the water :(
Why do you believe that?
Personally, I don't think there's any need for panic. Too much money
involved.
Hello.
Thanks a lot to Erik for this info (I have forwarded to news french site,
because, I live in France :), so .. )
An offtopic message is not inevitably a spam,
in my humble opinion.
A real name, or a pseudo is better that an unix current user I think, that's
all.
And god is Klaus, here ;)
On 3/15/07, Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Absolutely, since (if this insanity really happens) it means that
projects like VDR are effectively dead in the water :(
Why do you believe that?
Personally, I don't think there's any need for panic. Too much money
involved. How many times h
Hi
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> IMHO this was a valuable piece of information
Absolutely, since (if this insanity really happens) it means that
projects like VDR are effectively dead in the water :(
I find it hard to believe that TV networks will be happy with
invalidating every piece of DVB hardw
Hi
I am not sure if I should post this to vdr or to v4l/dvb as I'm not sure
where the problem lies.
One of our local TV stations changed their broadcast configuration as
follows:
"Guard Interval will change from 1/8 to 1/16
The FEC will change from 2/3 to 3/4"
To get this channel working a
