Re: [vdr] Two VDR's on one machine

2008-01-11 Thread serge pecher
As far as I can see I get the needed modules loaded (stb6100, stb0899, lnbp21 saa7416, budget-ci) When I try make unload and make load it loads 204 modules and I get no image at all anymore in vdr, nor on the nexus-s nor on the s2-3200. I think because s2-3200 comes as adapter0 and nexus as

[vdr] Rotor patch for 1.5.12

2008-01-11 Thread lucian orasanu
Hy again! thanks for the patch and cmd line, but afther patching vdr with that patch i get the following error when compiling vdr: dvbdevice.c:946: error: no 'bool cDvbDevice::SendDiseqcCmd(dvb_diseqc_master_cmd)' member function declared in class 'cDvbDevice' rotor plugin compile ok! 10x!! for

Re: [vdr] plugin for bouquet/favorite channels

2008-01-11 Thread serge pecher
Have a look at prefermenu serge -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Igor Verzonden: vrijdag 11 januari 2008 10:48 Aan: vdr@linuxtv.org Onderwerp: [vdr] plugin for bouquet/favorite channels Hi is there any plugins for creating of lists the

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] improved LIRC remote for VDR-1.5.12

2008-01-11 Thread Jörg Knitter
Reinhard Nissl wrote: The attached patch allows now to define timeouts and frequencies for example in Make.config, so there is no need to patch every VDR version. Furthermore, frequencies are now defined in unit 1/s instead of the unit ms (which defined the period), making values more

Re: [vdr] vdr-rotor patch for multiproto

2008-01-11 Thread Igor
I want to ask in another way - Anybody know a way to make work the latest vdr-rotor 0.1.4 with multiproto api, h.264 dvb-s2 patches from Reinhard Nissl on vdr 1.5.12 ? Igor ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

[vdr] vdr-rotor patch for multiproto

2008-01-11 Thread ThE-GuRuZ
Hi all!!! Anybody know a way to make work vdr-rotor with multiproto api? Byez! _ La mia Cartella di Posta in Arrivo è protetta con SPAMfighter 182 messaggi contenenti spam sono stati bloccati con successo. Scarica gratuitamente SPAMfighter http://www.spamfighter.com/lit !

Re: [vdr] BUG: DVB-T and DVB-S[2] do not work with VDR multiproto [Was: Two VDR's on one machine]

2008-01-11 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Reinhard Nissl schrieb: So it seems to me that either the emulation layer has a bug for DVB-T or the patched VDR passes incorrect data to the new API. Looks like the latter is true: Marco Schlüßler informed me that the mapping of TransmissionModes in nit.c for DVB-T is wrong. I've

Re: [vdr] Rotor patch for 1.5.12

2008-01-11 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, lucian orasanu schrieb: Hy again! thanks for the patch and cmd line, but afther patching vdr with that patch i get the following error when compiling vdr: dvbdevice.c:946: error: no 'bool cDvbDevice::SendDiseqcCmd(dvb_diseqc_master_cmd)' member function declared in class 'cDvbDevice'

Re: [vdr] vdr-rotor patch for multiproto

2008-01-11 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Igor schrieb: I want to ask in another way - Anybody know a way to make work the latest vdr-rotor 0.1.4 with multiproto api, h.264 dvb-s2 patches from Reinhard Nissl on vdr 1.5.12 ? I'll give it a try this weekend (most likely). Testers are welcome as I do not own a rotor. Regarding

[vdr] [S] ARD Sabine Christiansen Mein 2008

2008-01-11 Thread Marco Goebenich
Hi! Has anybody recorded this? Regards Marco -- Needful GbR Johann-Kalb-Strasse 14a Telefon +49 (0) 26 24 / 95 29 301 56203 Hoehr-Grenzhausen Telefax +49 (0) 26 24 / 95 29 303 ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] improved LIRC remote for VDR-1.5.12

2008-01-11 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Ludwig Nussel schrieb: Since the lirc thread doesn't do anything except waiting for input most of the time it should be scheduled quickly anyways. Maybe the useless select timeout destroys that advantage somewhat. I don't think so. In my case (i. e. on my EPIA MII-6000E), there are a lot

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] improved LIRC remote for VDR-1.5.12

2008-01-11 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Nicolas Huillard schrieb: An option would be to lower priority of all threads except this one. I guess only relative priority within VDR is important. You can also raise priority in your init scripts (nice=-N), before running VDR. This way every thread will have nice=0 priority, except