On Sunday 04 January 2009, Vladimir Kangin wrote:
You right. For example I'm keen of LinuxMCE (www.linuxmce.org) and it
has a script that looking for media files, thus all .vdr are recognised
as a video files of VDR while is not. It would would be a very wise step
to improve this at the same
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:17:52AM +0200, Jukka Vaisanen wrote:
Yes, it's a good idea to get 1:1 pixel mapping on your display. Double
scaling (first pc, then display) is not a good idea, ever.
But, some problems arise:
HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a
Hi guys,
Klaus wrote:
I've already dropped them.
Besides, these files are just auxiliary internal files for VDR's
very own purposes. There should normally be no need to edit them at
all.
I'm writing from work (webmail), so sorry if the email format gets
fudged up.
I never really liked the
I don't know how to do the latter, and even if it is possible in all
cases. In my setup, I have set up my video card to 1:1 to the panel I
have (fullHD), since I have material in several different resolutions,
This is the theory. But you need to remember that you are using TV set as
a
Antti Hartikainen wrote:
Solution so far has been to use little transparent background, but it looks
ugly, not like normal
text should look like (white text with few pixels thick black border)
I think VDR doesn't support drawing an outlined OSD text.
The only way to do this, might be to
Jukka Vaisanen wrote:
HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a
vertical blanking time slot believe it or not) so it may seem like just
another connector.. however in their finite wisdom the HDMI
standardization people decided that HDMI will not support arbitrary
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:12:04 +0200
Pasi Juppo p...@juppo.fi wrote:
I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html)
and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully
the developer can actually do it.
Do you mean ambitious? Yes, it is going to be a
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:23:51 +0200
Jukka Vaisanen jukka.vaisa...@exomi.com wrote:
24p is just a framerate, in HD it's actually 1080p but with 24 frames
per second instead of 60. There are also NTSC DVDs with 24p video but
that's a whole different story that we won't get into..
Yes, I know, but
I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html)
and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully
the developer can actually do it.
Do you mean ambitious? Yes, it is going to be a big challenge, but
hopefully it'll get there one day.
At least for
2009/1/6 jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com:
I don't know how to do the latter, and even if it is possible in all
cases. In my setup, I have set up my video card to 1:1 to the panel I
have (fullHD), since I have material in several different resolutions,
This is the theory. But you need to
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:29:55 +
Scott sc...@waye.co.uk wrote:
As Im just starting to get vdr working, I was wondering if 1:1 pixel
mapping between the video card (nvidia onboard HDMI output) and my
flat panel (Samsung plasma) is a waste of time. When looking at a
computer generated image
VDR developer version 1.7.3 is now available at
ftp://ftp.cadsoft.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.3.tar.bz2
A 'diff' against the previous version is available at
ftp://ftp.cadsoft.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.2-1.7.3.diff
WARNING:
This is a *developer* version. Not even *I* use it
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
- cDvbDevice now uses the FE_CAN_2G_MODULATION flag to determine whether a
device
can handle DVB-S2. The #define is still there to allow people with older
drivers
who don't need DVB-S2 to use this version without pathcing.
Sorry for hijacking
On 06.01.2009 17:32, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
- cDvbDevice now uses the FE_CAN_2G_MODULATION flag to determine
whether a device
can handle DVB-S2. The #define is still there to allow people with
older drivers
who don't need DVB-S2 to use this
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:47:35 +0200 (EET)
Mika Laitio lam...@pilppa.org wrote:
I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html)
and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully
the developer can actually do it.
Do you mean ambitious? Yes, it is
Tony Houghton wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:12:04 +0200
Pasi Juppo p...@juppo.fi wrote:
I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html)
and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully
the developer can actually do it.
Do you mean
Tony Houghton wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 16:47:35 +0200 (EET)
Mika Laitio lam...@pilppa.org wrote:
I checked boxstar web-page (http://boxstar.sourceforge.net/index.html)
and I have to say that the goal of the project is ambiguous. Hopefully
the developer can actually do it.
Do
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:47:14 +0200
Pasi Juppo p...@juppo.fi wrote:
Few comments/suggestions to boxstar:
-roadmap: boxtar itself does not seem to show EPG unless it is
incorporated into manage timers and recordings. Anyhow, I really hope
you implement TVOnScreen type of EPG viewer and similar
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Ville Aakko wrote:
On my Sony it is called Täyskuiva (in finnish),
Heh, is this spelling error yours or Sony's? :)
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
An updated Femon plugin is now available for both vdr-1.6.x and
vdr-1.7.x branches. These versions should fix the reported leaking of
frontend file handles.
http://www.saunalahti.fi/~rahrenbe/vdr/femon/
BR,
--
rofa
___
vdr mailing list
20 matches
Mail list logo
