Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread fnu
about Pause and rewind live TV. What is live TV there, as it is already recorded ... ? Only users which didn't got into VDR and epgsearch timers do call for this live buffer function. They hope for a kind of security, which this function doesn't really provide. You want to have a feeling how

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 29.02.2012 21:33, Udo Richter wrote: Am 29.02.2012 16:17, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: + The function cDevice::Receiving() now returns true if there is any receiver attached to the device. Its boolean parameter has no meaning any more. Please remember to drop the following line from

[vdr] Theses Client/Server VDR

2012-03-02 Thread fnu
Hi there, following the discussion regarding Client/Server the last couple of day, I'm honestly horrified. What I did realize where super complex ideas, hacks, bottomline a solution from developers for developers. I got the imagination some want to keep out normal users, inventing VDR to death,

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Pertti Kosunen
On 29.2.2012 10:20, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: Yes, the next stable version will be 2.0. It would be great if next stable could include ttxtsubs-plugin readiness, i.e. recording/viewing teletext subtitles would not require patching of main VDR code anymore.

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Pertti Kosunen
On 2.3.2012 12:35, Jarkko Kangas wrote: It would be also great if next stable could include mainmenuhooks-patch so extrecmenu- and epgsearch-plugins would not require patching VDR code anymore. Epgsearch doesn't need patching. ___ vdr mailing list

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Frank Schmirler
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:06:03 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote I'm currently considering giving GetDevice() another parameter: static cDevice *GetDevice(const cChannel *Channel, int Priority, bool LiveView, bool Query = false); and make it not do any CAM assignments or receiver

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Jarkko Kangas
On 2.3.2012 13:06, Pertti Kosunen wrote: Epgsearch doesn't need patching. I think it does, if you want replace VDR's standard schedule menu with epgsearch? ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Frank Schmirler
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:08:42 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote On 01.03.2012 09:38, Frank Schmirler wrote: On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:33:31 +0100, Udo Richter wrote Am 29.02.2012 16:17, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: + The function cDevice::Receiving() now returns true if there is any receiver

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 02.03.2012 12:54, Frank Schmirler wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:08:42 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote On 01.03.2012 09:38, Frank Schmirler wrote: On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:33:31 +0100, Udo Richter wrote Am 29.02.2012 16:17, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: + The function cDevice::Receiving()

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Tony Houghton
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:29:00 +0100 Gerald Dachs v...@dachsweb.de wrote: Am 2012-03-02 00:18, schrieb Tony Houghton: Going off on a tangent, there's been some discussion about Pause and rewind live TV. That could be implemented fairly easily in clients with a big RAM buffer, without

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Tony Houghton
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:30:37 +0100 fnu v...@auktion.hostingkunde.de wrote: about Pause and rewind live TV. What is live TV there, as it is already recorded ... ? Only users which didn't got into VDR and epgsearch timers do call for this live buffer function. They hope for a kind of

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Udo Richter
Am 02.03.2012 11:35, schrieb Jarkko Kangas: On 2.3.2012 12:17, Pertti Kosunen wrote: It would be great if next stable could include ttxtsubs-plugin readiness, i.e. recording/viewing teletext subtitles would not require patching of main VDR code anymore. It would be also great if next stable

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Frank Schmirler
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:01:23 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote On 02.03.2012 12:54, Frank Schmirler wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:08:42 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote On 01.03.2012 09:38, Frank Schmirler wrote: On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:33:31 +0100, Udo Richter wrote Am 29.02.2012 16:17,

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread Udo Richter
Am 02.03.2012 10:30, schrieb fnu: You want to have a feeling how it feels, if a live buffer is the underlying central function in a PVR solution, just go and test MythTV. I think the main objection against buffering was that for old FF cards, this also forces transfer mode, resulting in

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.24

2012-03-02 Thread VDR User
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: Signal the server to start recording. But then the client has to be able to match up its buffer with what the server has recorded after the buffer filled and let the server know when the temp recording is no longer needed.