>Hello
>I use VDR a few years, but lately I changed my system into ITX (AMD
>Brazos) and so changed PCI DVB-S2 card into USB. Additionaly I has
>bought DVB-T tuner.
>
>
>The last miss was buying USB DVB-T stick based on Af9015. Generally it
>works, but only a few minutes. I suspect it overheats
You can get a sony playtv, they are dual tuner and it's mostly plug
and play, except for intermittent noise from time to time (suspecting
retuning second tuner for eit scanning causing noise on first tuner).
On 21 May 2012 07:48, Marx wrote:
> Hello
> I use VDR a few years, but lately I changed m
Hello
I use VDR a few years, but lately I changed my system into ITX (AMD
Brazos) and so changed PCI DVB-S2 card into USB. Additionaly I has
bought DVB-T tuner.
While buying hardware I was sure I buy hardware which is supported
in-kernel, so no need to hunt for driver.
Unfortunatelly every fro
I have such a card, Pinnacle PCTV SAT HDTV 452E PRO USB.
I'm trying to use it but no luck.
I've tried (I use Debian):
- linux 3.2 kernel
After reboot many errors:
May 20 10:08:47 wuwek kernel: [ 63.984760] pctv452e:
pctv452e_power_ctrl: 1
May 20 10:08:47 wuwek kernel: [ 63.984763]
May 20 10:
VDR User wrote:
You can prevent emergency exit from actually exiting within VDR setup,
or setting `EmergencyExit = 0` in the setup.conf file.
Thank you. I did check the MANUAL file before posting, but missed that
entry.
Regards,
Richard
___
vd
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Richard Scobie wrote:
> Is it expected behavior for vdr to do an emergency exit with two recordings
> in progress? If so, perhaps there could be an option to disable this.
>
> I was recording a program on one tuner, while recording and delayed viewing
> a sports f
Is it expected behavior for vdr to do an emergency exit with two
recordings in progress? If so, perhaps there could be an option to
disable this.
I was recording a program on one tuner, while recording and delayed
viewing a sports feed on the second tuner.
When the carrier was dropped at the
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Thomas Sailer
wrote:
>> This subject has come up at least a few times, one of which was in the
>> "The right way to interpret the content of SNR, signal strength and
>> BER from HVR 4000 Lite" thread. For some reason the
>
> Apart from the SNR/Signal Strength issu
Am 20.05.2012 19:24, schrieb Thomas Sailer:
On 05/20/2012 05:51 PM, VDR User wrote:
This subject has come up at least a few times, one of which was in the
"The right way to interpret the content of SNR, signal strength and
BER from HVR 4000 Lite" thread. For some reason the
Apart from the SNR
My card is old mystique model satix dvb-s2 ( KNC1 DVB-S2 Plus , Satelco
Easywatch DVB-S2 , TT S2 3200, Technisat DVB-S2 all i think has same
problem ).
Card is working fine, but i cannot see signal level on femon, and can not
use any channel scan program like wirbelsacn ( no signal il locked ).
I h
On 05/20/2012 05:51 PM, VDR User wrote:
This subject has come up at least a few times, one of which was in the
"The right way to interpret the content of SNR, signal strength and
BER from HVR 4000 Lite" thread. For some reason the
Apart from the SNR/Signal Strength issue, does the card work fo
Hi
Attached is a patch which allows to toggle the sort order
of recordings in the recording menu with vdr-1.7.27 between
- name
- date
- recording length
by pressing 0 key. At least I have found this to be very useful
feature when trying to find a just made recording from which you
do not know/re
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
wrote:
> Well, maybe if this is common to all STB0899 frontends it could even be
> fixed in the driver itself ;-)
> I always thought that the *driver* should provide a normalized interface
> for getting signal strength and snr. It can't be reasona
On 20.05.2012 13:55, Matti Lehtimäki wrote:
On 05/20/2012 02:45 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 20.05.2012 13:41, Matti Lehtimäki wrote:
On 05/20/2012 02:15 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
One more thing comes to mind: you also need to make sure that
the 'day' is set to the day of the EPG event.
On 05/20/2012 02:45 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 20.05.2012 13:41, Matti Lehtimäki wrote:
On 05/20/2012 02:15 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
One more thing comes to mind: you also need to make sure that
the 'day' is set to the day of the EPG event. Just in case it
is past midnight already and
On 20.05.2012 13:41, Matti Lehtimäki wrote:
On 05/20/2012 02:15 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
One more thing comes to mind: you also need to make sure that
the 'day' is set to the day of the EPG event. Just in case it
is past midnight already and the event started "yesterday" ;-)
Indeed that wa
On 05/20/2012 02:15 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
One more thing comes to mind: you also need to make sure that
the 'day' is set to the day of the EPG event. Just in case it
is past midnight already and the event started "yesterday" ;-)
Indeed that was missing. I think setting the day is relevan
On 20.05.2012 13:09, Matti Lehtimäki wrote:
On 05/20/2012 12:37 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Nice idea.
However, please also take VPS into account.
If Setup.UseVps is set, and the event has a VPS time, the timer's
start time should be set to the VPS time, and the timer's ttVps
flag should be set
On 05/20/2012 12:37 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Nice idea.
However, please also take VPS into account.
If Setup.UseVps is set, and the event has a VPS time, the timer's
start time should be set to the VPS time, and the timer's ttVps
flag should be set.
Hi
Attached is a new version of the patc
On 20.05.2012 11:30, Matti Lehtimäki wrote:
Hi
I made a patch to allow special case for instant recordings to only record the
present event. This is done by defining Instant rec. time to 0.
Nice idea.
However, please also take VPS into account.
If Setup.UseVps is set, and the event has a VPS
Hi
I made a patch to allow special case for instant recordings to only
record the present event. This is done by defining Instant rec. time to 0.
There is still the question what should be done if event is non-existent
or otherwise not obtained? Should the VDR default Instant rec. time be
us
On 20.05.2012 10:55, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:57:35PM +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 19.05.2012 22:32, Juergen Lock wrote:
Hi!
(I guess the forums are not the best place to post this, hence
reposted here...)
By accident I stumbled across the special case for TT-bu
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:57:35PM +0200, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 19.05.2012 22:32, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > (I guess the forums are not the best place to post this, hence
> > reposted here...)
> >
> > By accident I stumbled across the special case for TT-budget S2-3200
> > (DVB-
23 matches
Mail list logo