Am Montag, den 18.06.2012, 18:11 +0200 schrieb Davide Chiarini
:
For Channel ids, have a look at the rfc used by the xmltv grabbers,
you
can find a copy on http://wiki.xmltv.org/index.php/XMLTVProject
Regards
Davide
I have tried to stay close to rfc2838:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2838
For Channel ids, have a look at the rfc used by the xmltv grabbers, you
can find a copy on http://wiki.xmltv.org/index.php/XMLTVProject
Regards
Davide
Il giorno 18/giu/2012 14:53, "Henning Pingel" ha
> To store all this metadata for a channel, the channel needs a unique ID
that is different fr
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:55:10 +0200
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 17.06.2012 16:50, Ludi wrote:
> > Could you please tell us whether the patch is compatible to vdr
> > 1.7.27? It is the version that is currently in use in the
> > development version of yavdr.
>
> It should apply just fine.
After
Hi,
I posted in the discussion "RFE: Make VDR more friendly when using
combinations of DVB-S, DVB-T and DVB-C" yesterday and mentioned that my
little project Channelpedia could be helpful in this regard. But because
my approach is more targeting the necessary semantic meta data that
would be
On 18.06.2012 11:27, mtron wrote:
On 06/17/2012 02:16 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Concerning whether to use the longer or the shorter version of the
name+source, I would choose the shorter version to not increase chances
of the new name not fitting in the OSD. Thus:
ZDF (S)
ZDF (T
On 06/17/2012 02:16 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> Concerning whether to use the longer or the shorter version of the
>> name+source, I would choose the shorter version to not increase chances
>> of the new name not fitting in the OSD. Thus:
>>
>> ZDF (S)
>> ZDF (T)
>> ZDF (C)
>
>
On 18.06.2012 08:37, Marx wrote:
What do you think about moving collision detection module into plugin? That way
it could be easily swapped. I'm sure many people have their preferences
different in how such module should work
There is no "collision detection" in core VDR yet, so there's nothi
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Marx wrote:
> I like the idea of external channels database. There is well known kingofsat
> site which is always up-to-date and inspite of scanning it could be easier
> to simply import channels definition from it. It for example could allow to
> import only cha
What do you think about moving collision detection module into plugin?
That way it could be easily swapped. I'm sure many people have their
preferences different in how such module should work
Marx
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linu
I like the idea of external channels database. There is well known
kingofsat site which is always up-to-date and inspite of scanning it
could be easier to simply import channels definition from it. It for
example could allow to import only channels from selected provider.
I imagine it could be
10 matches
Mail list logo