Re: [vdr] New Makefile system

2013-03-27 Thread Lucian Muresan
On 26.03.2013 17:19, Manuel Reimer wrote: Lucian Muresan wrote: So it does on Gentoo, but the problem was with various plugin makefiles actually, which claimed to be new style but for whatever reason the persons who adapted them to the new style removed including $(PLGCFG) or circumvented it

[vdr] Problem with vdr and a Hauppage WinTV-Duet

2013-03-27 Thread Marc
Hi, I try to use a new receiver (Hauppage WinTV-Duet, a dual dvb-t usb receiver) but it doesn't work. When I start vdr, I can see them in vdr : vdr: [16411] new device number 3 vdr: [16436] section handler thread started (pid=16411, tid=16436, prio=low) vdr: [16411] frontend 2/0 provides

[vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR Power Button Daemon 0.0.1

2013-03-27 Thread Manuel Reimer
Hello List, I have written a small daemon, which can replace acpid on VDR systems and was written with dedicated VDR systems in mind. Core Features: - Faster than acpid with all the required external scripts. - Emergency reboot feature. You don't loose the power button as safe emergency

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR Power Button Daemon 0.0.1

2013-03-27 Thread YUP
Very cool! Gonna try it. Integration with systemd is very useful. Best, Yarema On Mar 27, 2013 6:45 PM, Manuel Reimer manuel.rei...@gmx.de wrote: Hello List, I have written a small daemon, which can replace acpid on VDR systems and was written with dedicated VDR systems in mind. Core

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR Power Button Daemon 0.0.1

2013-03-27 Thread Manuel Reimer
YUP wrote: Very cool! Gonna try it. Integration with systemd is very useful. Would be very useful, but at least the inhibitor thing, which was intented to block systemd from shutting down the system if the button is pressed, seems to be broken. So if you use it on systemd-based systems, you

Re: [vdr] New Makefile system

2013-03-27 Thread Lars Hanisch
Hi, Am 27.03.2013 18:40, schrieb Lucian Muresan: [2] for example, an empty LIBS variable, also used in the correct order (after OBJS) in the final link statement, just for the case that a plugin have use them, it could have spared some authors of putting it in wrong order and then wonder

Re: [vdr] New Makefile system

2013-03-27 Thread Lucian Muresan
On 27.03.2013 23:07, Lars Hanisch wrote: Could continue with CACHEDIR, but that applies to less plugins... I understand CACHEDIR as a location for runtime generated data which doesn't necessarily survive reboots of the vdr. I don't think it should be the target of any installation files.

Re: [vdr] New Makefile system

2013-03-27 Thread VDR User
I'm just curious.. Is there any other software anyone can think of that had so much controversy surrounding a Makefile? I'm not aware of any myself but that doesn't mean much. Surely there's enough packaged software out there that methods for these problems, if that's what they are, have been

Re: [vdr] New Makefile system

2013-03-27 Thread Lars Hanisch
Am 28.03.2013 00:20, schrieb Lucian Muresan: On 27.03.2013 23:07, Lars Hanisch wrote: Could continue with CACHEDIR, but that applies to less plugins... I understand CACHEDIR as a location for runtime generated data which doesn't necessarily survive reboots of the vdr. I don't think it