Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
If this auto sized ringbuffers change (which, from what I can
see so far - haven't tried it myself - looks like a good idea)
is ever to make its way into the official VDR source, you'll need
to get rid of the above waiting. It says in receiver.h:
...the call must
Stone writes:
It still wouldn't surprise me if this version caused a few overflows,
but hopefully these will be very rare.
I'm curious how streamdev will function with these buffer changes.
And since I am not convinced that this memory footprint issue is
significant, I am concerned
And since I am not convinced that this memory footprint issue is
significant,
at a first glance, IMHO dynamic buffers are a good thing. we can get
rid of small upper buffer size bounderies all together without wasting
amounts of memory. this should result in even less buffer overflows
when
Stone wrote:
It still wouldn't surprise me if this version caused a few overflows,
but hopefully these will be very rare.
I'm curious how streamdev will function with these buffer changes.
it works fine -- i'm using a headless vdr server and streamdev+softdevice
clients, so
this
Jouni Karvo wrote:
Stone writes:
It still wouldn't surprise me if this version caused a few overflows,
but hopefully these will be very rare.
I'm curious how streamdev will function with these buffer changes.
And since I am not convinced that this memory footprint issue is
