Niko Mikkila wrote:
cheap ATI and NVIDIA cards are good for HD video output (esp. NVIDIA
because you can get MPEG-2 acceleration working with the binary
drivers). The cheapest passively cooled cards work as well for video
playback on Linux as the high-end models, so don't pay over 40 euros
for on
Hello all. I have battled with my hardware and software for a week or two,
only with partial success. Then I just lost my motivation. Now my
Motivation Fairy
appeared to me again. She gave good advice: ask for help. :)
I am currently using my VDR 1.4 with the composite video output
of my FF H
On Freitag 15 September 2006 20:16, Niko Mikkila wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 01:23:58 +0900 (EIT)
> "Anthony Hornby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > just discovered that my trusty old G550 can only do 1280x1024 via the DVI
> > output damn it !!
> >
> > Anyone have any reco
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 01:23:58 +0900 (EIT)
"Anthony Hornby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> just discovered that my trusty old G550 can only do 1280x1024 via the DVI
> output damn it !!
>
> Anyone have any recommendations for a card which will work with softdevice
> and directfb o
Hi everyone,
just discovered that my trusty old G550 can only do 1280x1024 via the DVI
output damn it !!
Anyone have any recommendations for a card which will work with softdevice
and directfb or vidix to do digital 1080p and 1080i resolution output via
DVI?
I will be connecting it via a DVI
Hi All,
I am running VDR on a debian system using backports.org for newer kernels.
I have a Matrox G550 graphics card with one analog DSUB 15 output and one
digital DVI output.
I have VDR working nicely connected by the DVI output via a DVI-HDMI cable
to my toshiba 62cm9ua rear projection TV. I am
