On Sun, 27 May 2007, Andrew Herron wrote:
I have to say that I agree with both of you... constructive criticism is
best!
As a quiet 'user' of vdr, for about a year, I agree with the sentiments in
Martin's post. It is very frustrating that vdr exits when reception is less
than perfect. I
Thanks all for your replys! At least I feel heard by the community.
Yes, you are right - I can not address my thoughts without emotions. So we
get into ITIL terminology. I will not do it 100% correct, as we need the
application of ITIL to the current problem.
Okay, here it comes. Some call it
On Monday 28 May 2007 10:38:50 Marko Myllymaa wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Andrew Herron wrote:
I have to say that I agree with both of you... constructive criticism is
best!
As a quiet 'user' of vdr, for about a year, I agree with the sentiments
in Martin's post. It is very frustrating
On 05/28/07 16:44, Lars Bläser wrote:
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 05/28/07 11:30, martin wrote:
Thanks all for your replys! At least I feel heard by the community.
...
[ ... lengthy pamphlet, repeated three(!) times ... ]
Martin, why don't you simply remove the cThread::EmergencyExit(true)
On Sunday 27 May 2007 18:49, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
I'm currently implementing support for Freetype fonts in VDR 1.5
(based on Alexander Riedel's patch) and would like to completely
drop all the pixel font stuff.
Just to make sure there won't be somebody who absolutely needs
the pixel
Igor Nikanov wrote:
Hello
what do you think about this card ? Is it good choice for future vdr with
hdtv support ?
http://www.hardspell.com/english/doc/sho...=622pageid=644
From the results we can see the HD acceleration of HD2600 and HD2400 is
striking.
The CPU usage is only about
Monday, May 28, 2007, 9:46:12 PM, Udo wrote:
The shutdown script has always been a fire-and-forget script that did
not evaluate any return codes or output. The only change that landed
together with the VDR shutdown rewrite in 1.5.1 is that the script is
now called detached from VDR, so it
