Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Thomas Hilber
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 04:23:59PM +1000, Torgeir Veimo wrote: > Ok, I have this hardware; > http://www.silentpcreview.com/article311-page1.html an asus mainboard > i915ga-hfs, with 915G graphics and onboard YPbPr and DVI outputs. I figure > with some tweaking, it should be possible to run pu

Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On 21 Jan 2009, at 16:17, Thomas Hilber wrote: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:22:15PM +1000, Torgeir Veimo wrote: Does it work with 915 hardware as well? Yup, a few days ago I successfully testet the patch on my Asus EEE 701. Even replaying interlaced SD content the 900MHz CPU idles at about

Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Thomas Hilber
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:22:15PM +1000, Torgeir Veimo wrote: > Does it work with 915 hardware as well? Yup, a few days ago I successfully testet the patch on my Asus EEE 701. Even replaying interlaced SD content the 900MHz CPU idles at about 60%. Please see table at http://www.vdr-portal.de/bo

Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On 21 Jan 2009, at 15:02, Thomas Hilber wrote: > > This way you now can build very cheap budget VDRs based on modern > hardware > like Intel D945GCLF/D945GCLF2 or Pundit P5945GC. With SCART output > quality > equaling a FF card but at fractional cost. Does it work with 915 hardware as well?

Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Thomas Hilber
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:21:53PM +, Tony Houghton wrote: > Varying the output frame rate to keep in sync with the input stream is > very clever, but I don't understand how it solves the problem of > distinguishing between top and bottom fields to sync to. surely you can distinguish top and b

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 20.01.2009 22:18, Oliver Endriss wrote: > Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> On 20.01.2009 16:01, Frank Schmirler wrote: >>> On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:43:22 +0100, Alexw wrote I have attached a raw TS capture (~10M) containing the PMT pid 132 which is revealing the problem. >>> Hum - PID 132 is

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread Oliver Endriss
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 20.01.2009 16:01, Frank Schmirler wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:43:22 +0100, Alexw wrote > >> I have attached a raw TS capture (~10M) containing the PMT pid 132 > >> which is revealing the problem. > > > > Hum - PID 132 is a french dolby track, not a PMT PID... >

Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Ville Aakko
2009/1/20 Tony Houghton : > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:19:49 +0200 > "Ville Aakko" wrote: > >> 1) You need to enable sync on vblanck. > > [Snip] > >> The first is not possible on all drivers (i.e. fglrx). > > Absolutely not possible? I know OpenGL, DRI and NVidia drivers all have > APIs for waiting f

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread alexw
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:11:17PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 20.01.2009 16:01, Frank Schmirler wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:43:22 +0100, Alexw wrote > >> I have attached a raw TS capture (~10M) containing the PMT pid 132 > >> which is revealing the problem. > > > > Hum - PID 132 i

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread alexw
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:01:17PM +0100, Frank Schmirler wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:43:22 +0100, Alexw wrote > > I have attached a raw TS capture (~10M) containing the PMT pid 132 > > which is revealing the problem. > > Hum - PID 132 is a french dolby track, not a PMT PID... > > Cheers, >

Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Tony Houghton
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:23:21 +0200 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > Please check this thread: > http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2008-July/017347.html > > Original patches: http://lowbyte.de/vga-sync-fields/ > > New version: http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?threadid=80567 > > Those might

Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Tony Houghton
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:19:49 +0200 "Ville Aakko" wrote: > 1) You need to enable sync on vblanck. [Snip] > The first is not possible on all drivers (i.e. fglrx). Absolutely not possible? I know OpenGL, DRI and NVidia drivers all have APIs for waiting for vblank and ISTR seeing a xine option fo

Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:54:18PM +, Scott Waye wrote: > I want to replace my UK Sky digital box with VDR (I only want the free > to air channels) for watching/recording TV over HDMI on my plasma. So > far everything is working OK, I have vdr 1.7.3 and xine running on an > ASUS M2N VM-HDMI

Re: [vdr] Options for deinterlacing (or not)

2009-01-20 Thread Ville Aakko
Hi Scott! 2009/1/19 Scott Waye : > If X is put into an interlaced mode (1920x1080i @ 50Hz), and I do not do > any de interlacing in xine, why is this not the same as what my digibox > does? I'm guessing it has something to do with xine outputting a > complete frame when the broadcast sends each f

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread Alexw
oops, it's a mistake. I am making reference to PMT pid 100 (sid 1537) Thanks for having spotted that. Cheers, Alex ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > > VDR uses the (fixed) "pseudo" PMT pid 0x0084, which is 132. > This was taken from some patch that implemented PAT/PMT handling > (don't remember which one it was, maybe it was even the code from > reel multimedia - not sure if I've missed m

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 20.01.2009 16:01, Frank Schmirler wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:43:22 +0100, Alexw wrote >> I have attached a raw TS capture (~10M) containing the PMT pid 132 >> which is revealing the problem. > > Hum - PID 132 is a french dolby track, not a PMT PID... VDR uses the (fixed) "pseudo" PMT pid

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread Frank Schmirler
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:43:22 +0100, Alexw wrote > I have attached a raw TS capture (~10M) containing the PMT pid 132 > which is revealing the problem. Hum - PID 132 is a french dolby track, not a PMT PID... Cheers, Frank ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linux

Re: [vdr] xineliboutput + vdpau not ready for prime time

2009-01-20 Thread Sascha Vogt
Hi, Gerald Dachs schrieb: >> I read something similar on the MythTV mailinglist. >> >From http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/users/366684: >>> In the end I believe it was accidental code bugs when he was >>> porting the automatic letterboxing patch over to work with VDPAU >>> that caused

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread Alexw
Hi Mika, I have already applied the mentioned patch ;-) But unfortunately it does not solve the issue. Cheers, Alex ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread Mika Laitio
> I did check the TS stream with dvbsnoop and it is not containing corrupted TS > packets. > > Apparently VDR is able to parse the PMT the first time the data buffer is > used. Then, it seems to loose the sync inside the payload. > > I have attached a raw TS capture (~10M) containing the PMT pid 13

Re: [vdr] PMT in multiple TS packet bug

2009-01-20 Thread Alexw
Hi, I did check the TS stream with dvbsnoop and it is not containing corrupted TS packets. Apparently VDR is able to parse the PMT the first time the data buffer is used. Then, it seems to loose the sync inside the payload. I have attached a raw TS capture (~10M) containing the PMT pid 132 wh