Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Working PlayTsXXX to PlayXXX wrapper

2009-01-26 Thread Udo Richter
On 26.01.2009 08:39, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 25.01.2009 23:53, Udo Richter wrote: >> Attached is a new version of cDevice::PlayTsVideo and >> cDevice::PlayTsAudio that properly handles partially accepted buffers of >> the PlayVideo and PlayAudio functions. The original functions would >> disc

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Working PlayTsXXX to PlayXXX wrapper

2009-01-26 Thread Udo Richter
On 26.01.2009 12:10, Udo Richter wrote: > On 26.01.2009 08:39, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> On 25.01.2009 23:53, Udo Richter wrote: >>> Attached is a new version of cDevice::PlayTsVideo and >>> cDevice::PlayTsAudio that properly handles partially accepted buffers of >>> the PlayVideo and PlayAudio f

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.4

2009-01-26 Thread Mika Laitio
> VDR developer version 1.7.4 is now available at Something made the hvr-4000 to work with this version of driver. With exactly same drivers and channel.conf file and streamdev-plugin and mplayer, the vdr-1.7.3 is not able to tune dvb-s channels but vdr-1.7.4 works :-) Mika __

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.4

2009-01-26 Thread Ulf Elsner
Am Sonntag 25 Januar 2009 16:08:30 schrieb Gregoire Favre: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 02:13:25PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > > What do you mean by "native h.264 support"? > > Didn't test vdr-1.7.4 (about to) but since 1.7.3 it works really great > with vdr-xine and xine-lib-1.2 :-) Hello, @

Re: [vdr] Delaying subtitles

2009-01-26 Thread Hannu Tirkkonen
Josce wrote: > My problem is that vdr 1.6.0 with the reelbox plugin > displays the subtitles 6 seconds too early. > > Does anyone know if there is a simple way to add a > 6 seconds delay to the subtitles? > > I tried to look at the old subtitle plugin and how it > was done there but couldn't see

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] ATSC for VDR 1.7.4

2009-01-26 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 25.01.2009 22:07, Alex Lasnier wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch adds ATSC support to VDR 1.7.4. > > Klaus, would you consider adding this to VDR? Am I right in understanding that ATSC is a "subset" of DVB-T? How are ATSC transponders announced in the NIT? Shouldn't there also be some code in

[vdr] vdr 1.7.4 & xineliboutput

2009-01-26 Thread gimli
I saw some things going on in the xineliboutput CVS. Not sure if TS should work or not. I tryed VDR 1.7.4 with xine-lib-vdpau and xineliboutput CVS. Got the following error : http://pastebin.com/m6691b7a8 cu Edgar (gimli) Hucek ___ vdr mailing list

[vdr] consistent device removal

2009-01-26 Thread Deti Fliegl
Hi, sometimes it is very useful to create and destroy cDevice based classes at runtime. Currently it is only possible to create such classes at any time but destroying causes inconsistency in the 'devices' array which leads to segmentation faults in various places. The patch attached keeps t

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] ATSC for VDR 1.7.4

2009-01-26 Thread Alex Lasnier
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 25.01.2009 22:07, Alex Lasnier wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This patch adds ATSC support to VDR 1.7.4. >> >> Klaus, would you consider adding this to VDR? > > Am I right in understanding that ATSC is a "subset" of DVB-T? > > How are ATSC transponders announced in the NIT?

Re: [vdr] consistent device removal

2009-01-26 Thread Deti Fliegl
uups: change the 'break' by 'return' otherwise you'll get a wrong error message ;-) Deti ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] consistent device removal

2009-01-26 Thread Udo Richter
On 26.01.2009 22:25, Deti Fliegl wrote: > sometimes it is very useful to create and destroy cDevice based classes > at runtime. Currently it is only possible to create such classes at any > time but destroying causes inconsistency in the 'devices' array which > leads to segmentation faults in vario

Re: [vdr] consistent device removal

2009-01-26 Thread Deti Fliegl
Udo Richter wrote: > Definitely something that is worth considering. The patch also brings us > one step closer towards hotplug support, a feature that seems very > obvious in times of USB DVB devices. Yep you are right but IMHO there would be some more work to do: VDR should compile also withou

Re: [vdr] consistent device removal

2009-01-26 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 26.01.2009 23:01, Deti Fliegl wrote: > Udo Richter wrote: >> Definitely something that is worth considering. The patch also brings us >> one step closer towards hotplug support, a feature that seems very >> obvious in times of USB DVB devices. > Yep you are right but IMHO there would be some m

[vdr] [PATCH] Section Filter Read Abstraction

2009-01-26 Thread Deti Fliegl
Hi, when using cDevice based classes that have no access to kernel based section filters it makes sense to have an abstract 'ReadFilter' function. The patch attached adds such a method to the cDevice class and changes cSectionHandler code to use the new method. Please add this patch to curre