Re: [vdr] from xineliboutput to ... perhaps softhdddevice?

2015-04-15 Thread Gerald Dachs
Am 2015-04-15 00:55, schrieb Niedermeier Günter: Am 14.04.2015 um 09:56 schrieb Gerald Dachs: Am 2015-04-14 08:59, schrieb Matthias Wächter: While streamdev and VNSI/XVDR solve some of the issues, most notably the multi-client dependency, they create new ones. No native OSD with VNSI/XVDR, VDR

Re: [vdr] from xineliboutput to ... perhaps softhdddevice?

2015-04-15 Thread VDR User
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: While streamdev and VNSI/XVDR solve some of the issues, most notably the multi-client dependency, they create new ones. No native OSD with VNSI/XVDR, VDR configuration synchronization hassle with streamdev. >>> use softhddevi

Re: [vdr] from xineliboutput to ... perhaps softhdddevice?

2015-04-15 Thread Gerald Dachs
Am 2015-04-15 16:43, schrieb VDR User: On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: While streamdev and VNSI/XVDR solve some of the issues, most notably the multi-client dependency, they create new ones. No native OSD with VNSI/XVDR, VDR configuration synchronization hassle with strea

Re: [vdr] from xineliboutput to ... perhaps softhdddevice?

2015-04-15 Thread VDR User
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: >> Proper server/client has been on the user wishlist for ages. There's >> no reason to be rude to someone looking for something better. If those >> solutions were all that great then there wouldn't be any reason to >> ask. Of all the people who

Re: [vdr] from xineliboutput to ... perhaps softhdddevice?

2015-04-15 Thread Gerald Dachs
Am 15.04.2015 um 18:37 schrieb VDR User: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: >>> Proper server/client has been on the user wishlist for ages. There's >>> no reason to be rude to someone looking for something better. If those >>> solutions were all that great then there wouldn't

Re: [vdr] from xineliboutput to ... perhaps softhdddevice?

2015-04-15 Thread VDR User
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: >>> To not say it and miss a change to get it done is useless. >> Who, and what have they coded? Project names? >> > So, you name me a liar? Would it change something if I would name projects? I'm genuinely curious who you talked into learning

Re: [vdr] from xineliboutput to ... perhaps softhdddevice?

2015-04-15 Thread Lars Hanisch
Am 15.04.2015 um 18:37 schrieb VDR User: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: >>> Proper server/client has been on the user wishlist for ages. There's >>> no reason to be rude to someone looking for something better. If those >>> solutions were all that great then there wouldn't

Re: [vdr] from xineliboutput to ... perhaps softhdddevice?

2015-04-15 Thread Lars Hanisch
Am 15.04.2015 um 22:49 schrieb VDR User: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: To not say it and miss a change to get it done is useless. >>> Who, and what have they coded? Project names? >>> >> So, you name me a liar? Would it change something if I would name projects? > >

Re: [vdr] from xineliboutput to ... perhaps softhdddevice?

2015-04-15 Thread Gerald Dachs
Am 2015-04-15 22:54, schrieb Lars Hanisch: Am 15.04.2015 um 18:37 schrieb VDR User: On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: Proper server/client has been on the user wishlist for ages. There's no reason to be rude to someone looking for something better. If those solutions were