Am 2015-04-15 16:43, schrieb VDR User:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Gerald Dachs <v...@dachsweb.de> wrote:
While streamdev and VNSI/XVDR solve some of the issues, most
the multi-client dependency, they create new ones. No native OSD
use softhddevice + vdr + streamdev-client on the clients and connect
VNSI/XVDR, VDR configuration synchronization hassle with streamdev.
streamdev-server on the main vdr.
Well, that works so far, but it is not an effective substitute for
functionality of vdr-sxfe,
at least not for what I use it mainly. All functions run on the
machine, and only the screen is
transferred to the local machine.
This solution, or the already mentioned possibility with Kodi and
are the only supported ways currently.
If this is not good for you, then start coding.
Proper server/client has been on the user wishlist for ages. There's
no reason to be rude to someone looking for something better. If those
solutions were all that great then there wouldn't be any reason to
ask. Of all the people who are scolded with `code it yourself then`,
how many actually can? Probably very very very few, so why bother with
such useless comments?
Nonsense, I have not been rude. I have even some examples where I told
this to other users
that started coding afterwords. That made it a very useful comment.
To not say it and miss a change to get it done is useless.
vdr mailing list