On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Ville Aakko wrote:
> On my Sony it is called "Täyskuiva" (in finnish),
Heh, is this spelling error yours or Sony's? :)
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:29:55 +
Scott wrote:
> As Im just starting to get vdr working, I was wondering if 1:1 pixel
> mapping between the video card (nvidia onboard HDMI output) and my
> flat panel (Samsung plasma) is a waste of time. When looking at a
> "computer" generated image like the des
2009/1/6 :
>
>> I don't know how to do the latter, and even if it is possible in all
>> cases. In my setup, I have set up my video card to 1:1 to the panel I
>> have (fullHD), since I have material in several different resolutions,
>
> This is the theory. But you need to remember that you are usin
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:23:51 +0200
"Jukka Vaisanen" wrote:
> 24p is just a framerate, in HD it's actually 1080p but with 24 frames
> per second instead of 60. There are also NTSC DVDs with 24p video but
> that's a whole different story that we won't get into..
Yes, I know, but what's the differen
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:17:52AM +0200, Jukka Vaisanen wrote:
> Yes, it's a good idea to get 1:1 pixel mapping on your display. Double
> scaling (first pc, then display) is not a good idea, ever.
>
> But, some problems arise:
>
> HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a
Jukka Vaisanen wrote:
> HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a
> vertical blanking time slot believe it or not) so it may seem like just
> another connector.. however in their finite wisdom the HDMI
> standardization people decided that HDMI will not support arbitrary
> re
> I don't know how to do the latter, and even if it is possible in all
> cases. In my setup, I have set up my video card to 1:1 to the panel I
> have (fullHD), since I have material in several different resolutions,
This is the theory. But you need to remember that you are using TV set as
a monit
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:17:52AM +0200, Jukka Vaisanen wrote:
> Yes, it's a good idea to get 1:1 pixel mapping on your display. Double
> scaling (first pc, then display) is not a good idea, ever.
>
> But, some problems arise:
>
> HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a
-Original Message-
From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On Behalf
Of Tony Houghton
Sent: 6. tammikuuta 2009 2:08
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:17:52 +0200
"Jukka Vaisanen" wrote:
>
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 01:17:52 +0200
"Jukka Vaisanen" wrote:
> HDMI uses DVI signalling for the video (and audio is hidden in a
> vertical blanking time slot believe it or not) so it may seem like just
> another connector.. however in their finite wisdom the HDMI
> standardization people decided tha
_
From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On Behalf
Of Scott
Sent: 6. tammikuuta 2009 6:30
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: [vdr] 1:1 pixel mapping - a waste of time?
As Im just starting to get vdr working, I was wondering if 1:1 pixel
mapping between the video card (nvidi
2009/1/6 Scott :
> As Im just starting to get vdr working, I was wondering if 1:1 pixel mapping
> between the video card (nvidia onboard HDMI output) and my flat panel
> (Samsung plasma) is a waste of time. When looking at a "computer" generated
> image like the desktop, its going to make a differ
As Im just starting to get vdr working, I was wondering if 1:1 pixel mapping between the video card (nvidia onboard HDMI output) and my flat panel (Samsung plasma) is a waste of time. When looking at a "computer" generated image like the desktop, its going to make a difference, but with broadc
13 matches
Mail list logo
