Re: [vdr] Comments on plugin Makefiles

2007-08-18 Thread Stefan Taferner
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 13:07:17 Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > Hi there! > > This time I have some comments on Makefiles for plugins. > 1. Is there any reason to not allow plain "make" without target to work? It > would be so easy to move the "all:" target before "%.o: %.c" line. I have the fol

Re: [vdr] Comments on plugin Makefiles

2007-08-15 Thread Udo Richter
Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > This time I have some comments on Makefiles for plugins. > 1. Is there any reason to not allow plain "make" without target to work? It > would be so easy to move the "all:" target before "%.o: %.c" line. My plugins usually have an early extra target like this to allow

Re: [vdr] Comments on plugin Makefiles

2007-08-15 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 08/15/07 13:07, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > Hi there! > > This time I have some comments on Makefiles for plugins. > 1. Is there any reason to not allow plain "make" without target to work? It No reason. > would be so easy to move the "all:" target before "%.o: %.c" line. Well, then let's

[vdr] Comments on plugin Makefiles

2007-08-15 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
Hi there! This time I have some comments on Makefiles for plugins. 1. Is there any reason to not allow plain "make" without target to work? It would be so easy to move the "all:" target before "%.o: %.c" line. Now when I call make I just get the first .c file compiled. when changing the all tar