I tried the attached patches. Most of them ended with errors, see below.
-
root@amd8:/usr/local/src/vdr-2.2.0/PLUGINS/src/xineliboutput# patch -N
./Makefile debian.patch
patching file ./Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 343.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED --
Hello,
you cloned the git repository to
/usr/local/src/vdr-2.2.0/PLUGINS/src/GIT/xineliboutput but you are
trying to run make in /usr/local/src/vdr-2.2.0/PLUGINS/src/xineliboutput
Have another look at the the error message - the text for line 706 in
config.c differs from the most recent vers
Hallo Lars,
thanks for your advice. I tried it, git worked fine. But compiling still
ends with an issue:
root@amd8:/usr/local/src/vdr-2.2.0/PLUGINS/src/GIT# git clone
git://projects.vdr-developer.org/xineliboutput.git
Nach »xineliboutput« wird geklont
remote: Counting objects: 12082, done.
r
Hi,
Am 14.02.2016 um 11:18 schrieb g.bruno:
> Hallo Klaus,
>
> I already tried VDR version 2.2.0, but it does not run, because the
> VDR-plugin-xineliboutput is missing for this
> Version. The Version I used with VDR 2.1.2 does not compile.
Have you tried the latest commits from:
git clone gi
Hallo Klaus,
I already tried VDR version 2.2.0, but it does not run, because the
VDR-plugin-xineliboutput is missing for this Version. The Version I used
with VDR 2.1.2 does not compile.
By the way: With VDR version 2.0.3 vdr --genindex works fine.
Greetings
G. Bruno
Am 14.02.2016 um 10:01
On 12.02.2016 15:50, g.bruno wrote:
Hallo Klaus,
in how far your answer ("part of the official VDR code" is helping me?
Sorry, I thought you didn't know that this patch has already been adopted.
What shall I do?
The best thing to do would probably be to switch to VDR version 2.2.0.
Anyw
Hallo Klaus,
in how far your answer ("part of the official VDR code" is helping me?
What shall I do? Anyway, patch does not work with your code. And also
manually I fail.
Greetings G.Bruno
Am 12.02.2016 um 10:39 schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 11.02.2016 20:17, g.bruno wrote:
Dear Sirs,
the
On 11.02.2016 20:17, g.bruno wrote:
Dear Sirs,
the patch to the subject above, published on
http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2013-December/028137.html
has several mistakes and is incomplete.
...
Maybe some whitespace problems.
The patch, however, ist part of the official VDR code.
Klaus
Dear Sirs,
the patch to the subject above, published on
http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2013-December/028137.html
has several mistakes and is incomplete.
Here the results from the "patch" command):
root@amd8:/usr/local/src/vdr-2.1.2# patch -b --verbose ./vdr.c < vdr_c.patch
Hmm... Looks li
On 02.12.2013 20:31, Lou wrote:
Am 02.12.2013, 17:59 Uhr, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger :
I guess this was caused by the changes to videodir.[ch].
For a quick fix you could try moving the line
cVideoDirectory::SetName(VideoDirectory);
into the
case 'v': VideoDirectory = optarg;
Am 02.12.2013, 17:59 Uhr, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger
:
I guess this was caused by the changes to videodir.[ch].
For a quick fix you could try moving the line
cVideoDirectory::SetName(VideoDirectory);
into the
case 'v': VideoDirectory = optarg;
while (optar
On 02.12.2013 17:55, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 02.12.2013 13:15, Lou wrote:
hi list
vdr 2.1.2 segfaults in libc, as soon as I use the terminal syntax (vdr
--genindex) to recreate a missing index file. Trying the same thing in a user
interface (vdr-sxfe) works as planed.
Here's a backtrace
On 02.12.2013 13:15, Lou wrote:
hi list
vdr 2.1.2 segfaults in libc, as soon as I use the terminal syntax (vdr
--genindex) to recreate a missing index file. Trying the same thing in a user
interface (vdr-sxfe) works as planed.
Here's a backtrace of what's happing:
/usr/local/src/vdr/vdr-2.1.
hi list
vdr 2.1.2 segfaults in libc, as soon as I use the terminal syntax (vdr
--genindex) to recreate a missing index file. Trying the same thing in a
user interface (vdr-sxfe) works as planed.
Here's a backtrace of what's happing:
/usr/local/src/vdr/vdr-2.1.2/vdr
--genindex=/var/lib/vi
14 matches
Mail list logo
