Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump patch 0.1

2011-03-23 Thread VDR User
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Udo Richter wrote: >> One question here, if I shrink already existing recordings with the >> command line tool, is it necessary to delete the index? > > The command line tool just processes a single .ts file. You have to > process each file of the recording, and yo

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump patch 0.1

2011-03-23 Thread Udo Richter
Am 23.03.2011 07:58, schrieb Matthias Fechner: > One question here, if I shrink already existing recordings with the > command line tool, is it necessary to delete the index? The command line tool just processes a single .ts file. You have to process each file of the recording, and you have to reg

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump patch 0.1

2011-03-23 Thread Matthias Fechner
On 22.03.11 21:03, Udo Richter wrote: The setup.conf option is DumpNaluFill=0 or 1. thanks, I will give it a test phase. One question here, if I shrink already existing recordings with the command line tool, is it necessary to delete the index? However I'd suggest you should run your VDR w

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump patch 0.1

2011-03-22 Thread Udo Richter
Am 22.03.2011 09:16, schrieb Matthias Fechner: > On 20.02.11 21:31, Udo Richter wrote: >> I've uploaded the final patch version of the h.264 NALU fill removal for >> VDR 1.7.16. > > which config parameter I must set in the setup.conf to enable this > patch? (I have no video output on my recording

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] naludump patch 0.1

2011-03-22 Thread Matthias Fechner
On 20.02.11 21:31, Udo Richter wrote: I've uploaded the final patch version of the h.264 NALU fill removal for VDR 1.7.16. which config parameter I must set in the setup.conf to enable this patch? (I have no video output on my recording machine, so OSD is not working) Thanks, Matthias -- "