Re: [vdr] dvbscan vs builtin update generates double entries.
On 19.12.2010 02:46, Oliver Schinagl wrote: I have created a channel.conf from dvbscan and used the built update function from VDR. All channels seem to be added/modified properly, but the FTA channels are different. Instead of modifying my current entry, it created new ones. Nederland 1;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500::::0:1101:8720:2214:0 Nederland 1;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7011:7012:7013:0:1101:8720:2211:0 Nederland 2;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500::::0:1102:8720:2214:0 Nederland 2;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7021:7022:7023:0:1102:8720:2211:0 Nederland 3;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500::::0:1103:8720:2214:0 Nederland 3;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7031:7032:7033:0:1103:8720:2211:0 I took the liberty of expanding the VID, AID and TID from 0 to so they'd align better in this e-mail only. All entries work however! Which baffles me. How can something without vid/aid work at all? Also, it seems that the 'proper' entry doesn't display EPG data at all. Ironically, the scrambled channels all seem to work just fine. Any clues on this? The channels with zero PIDs have a TID (Transport stream ID) of 2214, ehile those with actual PIDs have 2211. Only one of these can be right, I guess. Klaus ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] dvbscan vs builtin update generates double entries.
On 19.12.2010 02:46, Oliver Schinagl wrote: I have created a channel.conf from dvbscan and used the built update function from VDR. All channels seem to be added/modified properly, but the FTA channels are different. Instead of modifying my current entry, it created new ones. Nederland 1;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500::::0:1101:8720:2214:0 Nederland 1;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7011:7012:7013:0:1101:8720:2211:0 Nederland 2;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500::::0:1102:8720:2214:0 Nederland 2;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7021:7022:7023:0:1102:8720:2211:0 Nederland 3;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500::::0:1103:8720:2214:0 Nederland 3;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7031:7032:7033:0:1103:8720:2211:0 I took the liberty of expanding the VID, AID and TID from 0 to so they'd align better in this e-mail only. All entries work however! Which baffles me. How can something without vid/aid work at all? Also, it seems that the 'proper' entry doesn't display EPG data at all. Ironically, the scrambled channels all seem to work just fine. Any clues on this? The channels with zero PIDs have a TID (Transport stream ID) of 2214, ehile those with actual PIDs have 2211. Only one of these can be right, I guess. Yip, I changed the TID to 2214 to get both epg info and not have VDR re-add it over and over again. Question remains, why does dvbscan and vdr-backgroundscanner find different TID's :S Klaus ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] dvbscan vs builtin update generates double entries.
On 27.12.2010 14:10, Oliver Schinagl wrote: On 19.12.2010 02:46, Oliver Schinagl wrote: I have created a channel.conf from dvbscan and used the built update function from VDR. All channels seem to be added/modified properly, but the FTA channels are different. Instead of modifying my current entry, it created new ones. Nederland 1;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500::::0:1101:8720:2214:0 Nederland 1;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7011:7012:7013:0:1101:8720:2211:0 Nederland 2;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500::::0:1102:8720:2214:0 Nederland 2;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7021:7022:7023:0:1102:8720:2211:0 Nederland 3;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500::::0:1103:8720:2214:0 Nederland 3;Digitenne:54600:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7031:7032:7033:0:1103:8720:2211:0 I took the liberty of expanding the VID, AID and TID from 0 to so they'd align better in this e-mail only. All entries work however! Which baffles me. How can something without vid/aid work at all? Also, it seems that the 'proper' entry doesn't display EPG data at all. Ironically, the scrambled channels all seem to work just fine. Any clues on this? The channels with zero PIDs have a TID (Transport stream ID) of 2214, ehile those with actual PIDs have 2211. Only one of these can be right, I guess. Yip, I changed the TID to 2214 to get both epg info and not have VDR re-add it over and over again. Question remains, why does dvbscan and vdr-backgroundscanner find different TID's :S That's a good question - let me know if you have the answer ;-) Klaus ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
