On 3/18/07, Martin Wache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I switched the repacking of in my vdr... I don't think that it is
necessary.
Bye,
Martin
Hi,
I would like to disable the repacker in my VDR implementation as I think it
might be responsible for sync problems in transfer mode between my b
Hi,
Georg Acher wrote:
> The new repacker may have some issues with AC3 or some audio-only channels,
> but maybe it's worth to have a look at its code...
>
> svn co svn://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/testing/src/vdr-1.4/
I'll have a look at it the next days.
I must admit, that the repacker classes were d
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 05:25:00PM +0100, Halim Sahin wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there a patch available with your modifications?
That's a bit difficult, since "our" vdr has no exact mainline equivalent.
It may contain parts from different vdr versions. But as I've heard, it
should work also on a full feat
Hi,
Is there a patch available with your modifications?
Thanks
Halim
On So, Mär 18, 2007 at 04:30:02 +0100, Georg
Acher wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 01:26:03PM +0100, Reinhard Nissl wrote:
>
> > > I switched the repacking off in my vdr... I don't think that it is
> > > necessary.
> >
> > M
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 01:26:03PM +0100, Reinhard Nissl wrote:
> > I switched the repacking off in my vdr... I don't think that it is
> > necessary.
>
> Maybe you are right. The benefit of avoiding memcpys when repacking is
> done already during the TS to PES transformation is void as long as
Hi,
Martin Wache wrote:
> I agree that it is cleaner to have an index file which points to
> complete frames, but I never experienced any problems without repacking.
So it seems to me that only xine's libmpeg2 has the problem to drop
incomplete frames. This was annoying when moving cutting marks
Reinhard Nissl schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Martin Wache wrote:
>
Is there a reason why the cAudioRepacker is used in transfer mode and
during recordings, but not while replaying?
>>> Well, when cAudioRepacker was active while recording, then there is no
>>> need for it when replaying such a reco
Stefan Lucke schrieb:
> On Saturday 17 March 2007 22:05, Martin Wache wrote:
>> I attached a patch with make the softdevice use av_read_frame(), it has
>> still some issues, but it solves the problems Stefan reports.
>
> Martin, thats really great.
> Thank you.
> This solves the issue I had with p
Hi,
Martin Wache wrote:
>>> Is there a reason why the cAudioRepacker is used in transfer mode and
>>> during recordings, but not while replaying?
>>
>> Well, when cAudioRepacker was active while recording, then there is no
>> need for it when replaying such a recording.
>
> Wouldn't it make more
On Saturday 17 March 2007 22:05, Martin Wache wrote:
> I attached a patch with make the softdevice use av_read_frame(), it has
> still some issues, but it solves the problems Stefan reports.
Martin, thats really great.
Thank you.
This solves the issue I had with playback of some old recordings.
B
On Saturday 17 March 2007 23:11, Martin Wache wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Reinhard Nissl schrieb:
>
> > And old recordings will
> > vanish as time passes by.
> >
> I don't buy this argument. I know that there are VDR users with large
> archives of recordings, do you want to tell them that they can't us
On Saturday 17 March 2007 20:57, Reinhard Nissl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Lucke wrote:
>
> > Dumping the first 16 bytes of audio packets we get, shows the following:
> > ff fc a4 0d b6 64 88 55 33 65 56 54 44 21 33 33
> > ff fc a4 0d 54 6a 88 65 33 44 56 54 33 33 33 33
> > ff fc a4 0d 02 a4 88 55 3
Hi,
Reinhard Nissl schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Martin Wache wrote:
>
>> Is there a reason why the cAudioRepacker is used in transfer mode and
>> during recordings, but not while replaying?
>
> Well, when cAudioRepacker was active while recording, then there is no
> need for it when replaying such a rec
Hi,
Martin Wache wrote:
> Is there a reason why the cAudioRepacker is used in transfer mode and
> during recordings, but not while replaying?
Well, when cAudioRepacker was active while recording, then there is no
need for it when replaying such a recording. And old recordings will
vanish as time
Reinhard Nissl schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Lucke wrote:
>
>> Dumping the first 16 bytes of audio packets we get, shows the following:
>> ff fc a4 0d b6 64 88 55 33 65 56 54 44 21 33 33
>> ff fc a4 0d 54 6a 88 65 33 44 56 54 33 33 33 33
>> ff fc a4 0d 02 a4 88 55 33 54 66 44 43 33 33 33
>> 99 77 1b
Hi,
Stefan Lucke wrote:
> Dumping the first 16 bytes of audio packets we get, shows the following:
> ff fc a4 0d b6 64 88 55 33 65 56 54 44 21 33 33
> ff fc a4 0d 54 6a 88 65 33 44 56 54 33 33 33 33
> ff fc a4 0d 02 a4 88 55 33 54 66 44 43 33 33 33
> 99 77 1b e6 34 b2 5f 41 e8 5b 90 a9 d2 04 24 5
16 matches
Mail list logo
