21.10.2012 09:23, Dan Kenigsberg kirjoitti:
skip /
We should decide NOW on the format of the capabilities «bag», and never
change it. Testing for a capability is much more reliable than checking
a version, and remembering which version had which capability.
Dan.
Ok, so what will we decide?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:26:44PM +0200, Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
21.10.2012 09:23, Dan Kenigsberg kirjoitti:
skip /
We should decide NOW on the format of the capabilities «bag», and never
change it. Testing for a capability is much more reliable than checking
a version, and remembering
I have just noticed that when a VM is started for the second time, Engine
issues the create vdsm verb with some information regarding
unmanaged devices (an example is shown below[1]) in the 'custom'
propery bag.
I'm surprised about this, as I was not aware of this usage of the
'custom'
On 21/10/12 16:42, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
I have just noticed that when a VM is started for the second time, Engine
issues the create vdsm verb with some information regarding
unmanaged devices (an example is shown below[1]) in the 'custom'
propery bag.
I'm surprised about this, as I was not
- Original Message -
From: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com
To: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com
Cc: Genadi Chereshnya gcher...@redhat.com, engine-de...@ovirt.org,
vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:18:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] unmanaged devices
- Original Message -
From: Yair Zaslavsky yzasl...@redhat.com
To: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com
Cc: Genadi Chereshnya gcher...@redhat.com, engine-de...@ovirt.org,
vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:38:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] unmanaged devices
