Il 12/11/2013 09:36, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 08:00:44AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Hi
On Fedora 19 I can see /etc/sysctl.d/vdsm but it seems that it's not read
because it should be /etc/sysctl.d/vdsm.conf ( see sysctl --system output )
Is that file really
Il 12/11/2013 10:39, Yaniv Bronheim ha scritto:
If you already in the fix scope, i think this part should move to
lib/vdsm/tool/configurator.py and we can call it from spec if required
the administrator might use it to check configurations and set them
So, can you take the bug? If it was
You can submit a short fix if you have such and I'll try to get there soon and
move it to the configurator
- Original Message -
From: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
To: Yaniv Bronheim ybron...@redhat.com
Cc: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com, dougsl...@redhat.com, vdsm-devel
Hey Patrick,
For the pep8 issue, as mentioned you should check pep8 --version and use 1.4.6.
If you use older version, just upgrade with python-pip
(yum install python-pip , and then `pip-install install pep8 --upgrade`)
Second, try to follow http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers , it specifies
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
Hi all,
sorry for this rant, but...
Thanks for ranting. Community testing and ranting are to be cherished.
We must improve in the points you have raised.
I now tried
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:33:44PM +, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto:
- How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating
to spend time on testing and then
- Original Message -
From: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com
To: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com, dc...@redhat.com
Cc: vdsm-devel vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org, oVirt Mailing List
us...@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:33:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] Low quality of el6
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote:
snip
- There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec
requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days?
it does run, but we can't enable it since it's still failing:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 04:41:53PM +, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote:
snip
- Keep the docs updated. Our Jenkins slaves have pep8-1.4.6, so we
should update
http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers#Installing_required_packages
On 12.11.2013 15:33, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
I suspect you are not interested in excuses for each of the failures,
let us look forwards. My conclusions are:
- Do not require non-yet-existing rpms. If we require a feature that is
not yet in Fedora/Centos, we must wait. This is already in
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:51:36PM -0500, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora
koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been
answered by others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build.
We would
11 matches
Mail list logo
