[vdsm] F17's libvirt takes comments into LIBVIRTD_ARGS

2012-05-16 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:16:11PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
 On 2012-5-14 7:30, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
 On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:51:48PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
 Hi,
Recently, I found that my host in engine was always in a
 unassigned state after the host node was installed.  After looking
 into the vdsm.log,  it seemed that vdsm failed to call libvirt as an
 error,  libvirtError: Cannot write data: Broken pipe.   When I
 started virsh in the host node at that time, a warning was given
 WARNING: no socket to connect to and core dumped with virsh
 net-list.   It looks like that no right socket was created for
 virsh to connect to libvirtd.  Any comments about this problem?  The
 followings are my steps in the node:
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# rpm -qa |grep vdsm
 vdsm-cli-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-python-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.x86_64
 vdsm-reg-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-debug-plugin-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-hook-faqemu-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-bootstrap-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]#
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# ps -ef |grep libvirt
 
 libvirt-daemon-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 libvirt-client-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 libvirt-python-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# virsh net-list
 WARNING: no socket to connect to
 Segmentation fault
 I think that merits a libvirt bug. please attach strace output to
 bugzilla.
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]#
 
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# ps -ef |grep vdsm
 root  1299 1  0 23:10 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/libvirtd
 --listen # by vdsm
 The command line of libvirt process is very odd - the comment that vdsm
 puts into /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd is somehow taken verbatim. That's bad,
 and may be related to Fedora 17's systemd services. Try to remove the
 comment and restart libvirtd to see if this is the case.
 The comment come from
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd:

I know that (see my text above). However, in F16 and before, comments have been 
stripped
before being passed to commandline. Have you tested if all is well when
the commment is removed?

Let's see what our friends in libvir-list think.

Dan.
___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


Re: [vdsm] F17's libvirt takes comments into LIBVIRTD_ARGS

2012-05-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:46:43PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
 On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:16:11PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
  On 2012-5-14 7:30, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
  On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:51:48PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
  Hi,
 Recently, I found that my host in engine was always in a
  unassigned state after the host node was installed.  After looking
  into the vdsm.log,  it seemed that vdsm failed to call libvirt as an
  error,  libvirtError: Cannot write data: Broken pipe.   When I
  started virsh in the host node at that time, a warning was given
  WARNING: no socket to connect to and core dumped with virsh
  net-list.   It looks like that no right socket was created for
  virsh to connect to libvirtd.  Any comments about this problem?  The
  followings are my steps in the node:
  
  [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# rpm -qa |grep vdsm
  vdsm-cli-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
  vdsm-python-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
  vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
  vdsm-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.x86_64
  vdsm-reg-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
  vdsm-debug-plugin-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
  vdsm-hook-faqemu-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
  vdsm-bootstrap-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
  [root@ovirt-node1 ~]#
  [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# ps -ef |grep libvirt
  
  libvirt-daemon-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
  libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
  libvirt-client-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
  libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
  libvirt-python-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
  
  [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# virsh net-list
  WARNING: no socket to connect to
  Segmentation fault
  I think that merits a libvirt bug. please attach strace output to
  bugzilla.
  
  [root@ovirt-node1 ~]#
  
  
  [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# ps -ef |grep vdsm
  root  1299 1  0 23:10 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/libvirtd
  --listen # by vdsm
  The command line of libvirt process is very odd - the comment that vdsm
  puts into /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd is somehow taken verbatim. That's bad,
  and may be related to Fedora 17's systemd services. Try to remove the
  comment and restart libvirtd to see if this is the case.
  The comment come from
  
  [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd:
 
 I know that (see my text above). However, in F16 and before, comments have 
 been stripped
 before being passed to commandline. Have you tested if all is well when
 the commment is removed?
 
 Let's see what our friends in libvir-list think.

In F16 we were using the shell to launch libvirtd, in F17 we are
using systemd. systemd has stricter requirements around the syntax
of /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd file. Specifically it treats the entire
line as the value.

FYI I add a BZ for this against vdsm along with a suggested
solution

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821867

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


[vdsm] [PATCH libvirt] Reject any non-option command line arguments

2012-05-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com

Due to a bug in editing /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd, VDSM was causing
libvirt processes to run with the following command line args

   /usr/sbin/libvirtd --listen '#' 'by vdsm'

While it correctly rejects any invalid option flags, libvirtd
was not rejecting any non-option command line arguments

* daemon/libvirtd.c: Reject non-option argv
---
 daemon/libvirtd.c |6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/daemon/libvirtd.c b/daemon/libvirtd.c
index 2696c54..0b5ae35 100644
--- a/daemon/libvirtd.c
+++ b/daemon/libvirtd.c
@@ -999,6 +999,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
 }
 }
 
+if (optind != argc) {
+fprintf(stderr, %s: unexpected, non-option, command line arguments\n,
+argv[0]);
+exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+}
+
 if (!(config = daemonConfigNew(privileged))) {
 VIR_ERROR(_(Can't create initial configuration));
 exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
-- 
1.7.10.1

___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


Re: [vdsm] RESTful VM creation

2012-05-16 Thread Adam Litke
No comments at all on this??

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:35:29AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
 I would like to discuss a problem that is going to affect VM creation in the 
 new
 REST API.  This topic has come up previously and I want to revive that
 discussion because it is blocking a proper implementation of VM.create().
 
 Consider a RESTful VM creation sequence:
   POST /api/vms/define - Define a new VM in the system
   POST /api/vms/id/disks/add - Add a new disk to the VM
   POST /api/vms/id/cdroms/add - Add a cdrom
   POST /api/vms/id/nics/add - Add a NIC
   PUT /api/vms/id - Change boot sequence
   POST /api/vms/id/start - Boot the VM
 
 Unfortunately this is not possible today with vdsm because a VM must be
 fully-specified at the time of creation and it will be started immediately.
 
 As I see it there are two ways forward:
 
 1.) Deviate from a REST model and require a VM resource definition to include
 all sub-collections inline.
 -- or --
 2.) Support storage of vm definitions so that powered off VMs can be 
 manipulated
 by the API.
 
 My preference would be #2 because: it makes the API more closely follow 
 RESTful
 principles, it maintains parity with the cluster-level VM manipulation API, 
 and
 it makes the API easier to use in standalone mode.
 
 Here is my idea on how this could be accomplished without committing to 
 stateful
 host storage.  In the past we have discussed adding an API for storing 
 arbitrary
 metadata blobs on the master storage domain.  If this API were available we
 could use it to create a transient VM construction site.  Let's walk through
 the above RESTful sequence again and see how my idea would work in practice:
 
 * POST /api/vms/define - Define a new VM in the system
 A new VM definition would be written to the master storage domain metadata 
 area.
 
 * GET /api/vms/new-uuid
 The normal 'list' API is consulted as usual.  The VM will not be found there
 because it is not yet created.  Next, the metadata area is consulted.  The VM 
 is
 found there and will be returned.  The VM state will be 'New'.
 
 * POST /api/vms/id/disks/add - Add a new disk to the VM
 For 'New' VMs, this will update the VM metadata blob with the new disk
 information.  Otherwise, this will call the hotplugDisk API.
 
 * POST /api/vms/id/cdroms/add - Add a cdrom
 For 'New' VMs, this will update the VM metadata blob with the new cdrom
 information.  If we want to support hotplugged CDROMs we can call that API
 later.
 
 * POST /api/vms/id/nics/add - Add a NIC
 For 'New' VMs, this will update the VM metadata blob with the new nic
 information.  Otherwise it triggers the hotplugNic API.
 
 * PUT /api/vms/id - Change boot sequence
 Only valid for 'New' VMs.  Updates the metadata blob according to the 
 parameters
 specified.
 
 * POST /api/vms/id/start - Boot the VM
 Load the metadata from the master storage domain metadata area.  Call the
 VM.create() API.  Remove the metadata from the master storage domain.
 
 VDSM will automatically purge old metadata from the master storage domain.  
 This
 could be done any time a domain is: attached as master, deactivated, and
 periodically.
 
 How does this idea sound?  I am certain that it can be improved by those of 
 you
 with more experience and different viewpoints.  Thoughts and comments?
 
 -- 
 Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com
 IBM Linux Technology Center
 
 ___
 vdsm-devel mailing list
 vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
 https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

-- 
Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com
IBM Linux Technology Center

___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


Re: [vdsm] [libvirt] [PATCH libvirt] Reject any non-option command line arguments

2012-05-16 Thread Eric Blake
On 05/16/2012 05:05 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
 From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
 
 Due to a bug in editing /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd, VDSM was causing
 libvirt processes to run with the following command line args
 
/usr/sbin/libvirtd --listen '#' 'by vdsm'
 
 While it correctly rejects any invalid option flags, libvirtd
 was not rejecting any non-option command line arguments
 
 * daemon/libvirtd.c: Reject non-option argv
 ---
  daemon/libvirtd.c |6 ++
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

ACK.

-- 
Eric Blake   ebl...@redhat.com+1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


Re: [vdsm] F17's libvirt takes comments into LIBVIRTD_ARGS

2012-05-16 Thread Shu Ming

On 2012-5-16 18:46, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:16:11PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:

On 2012-5-14 7:30, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:

On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:51:48PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:

Hi,
   Recently, I found that my host in engine was always in a
unassigned state after the host node was installed.  After looking
into the vdsm.log,  it seemed that vdsm failed to call libvirt as an
error,  libvirtError: Cannot write data: Broken pipe.   When I
started virsh in the host node at that time, a warning was given
WARNING: no socket to connect to and core dumped with virsh
net-list.   It looks like that no right socket was created for
virsh to connect to libvirtd.  Any comments about this problem?  The
followings are my steps in the node:

[root@ovirt-node1 ~]# rpm -qa |grep vdsm
vdsm-cli-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
vdsm-python-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
vdsm-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.x86_64
vdsm-reg-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
vdsm-debug-plugin-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
vdsm-hook-faqemu-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
vdsm-bootstrap-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
[root@ovirt-node1 ~]#
[root@ovirt-node1 ~]# ps -ef |grep libvirt

libvirt-daemon-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-client-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-python-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64

[root@ovirt-node1 ~]# virsh net-list
WARNING: no socket to connect to
Segmentation fault

I think that merits a libvirt bug. please attach strace output to
bugzilla.


[root@ovirt-node1 ~]#


[root@ovirt-node1 ~]# ps -ef |grep vdsm
root  1299 1  0 23:10 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/libvirtd
--listen # by vdsm

The command line of libvirt process is very odd - the comment that vdsm
puts into /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd is somehow taken verbatim. That's bad,
and may be related to Fedora 17's systemd services. Try to remove the
comment and restart libvirtd to see if this is the case.

The comment come from

[root@ovirt-node1 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd:

I know that (see my text above). However, in F16 and before, comments have been 
stripped
before being passed to commandline. Have you tested if all is well when
the commment is removed?


I removed the #  by vdsm  line from the config file.  And restarted 
the libvirtd and vdsmd service.
But no luck to make virsh net-list successful, still got Segmentation 
fault, while virsh -c qemu:///system -r worked.


virsh # net-list
Segmentation fault
[root@ovirt-node1 ~]# virsh net-list
Segmentation fault
[root@ovirt-node1 ~]# virsh -c qemu:///system
Please enter your authentication name: ^C
[root@ovirt-node1 ~]# virsh -c qemu:///system -r
Welcome to virsh, the virtualization interactive terminal.

Type:  'help' for help with commands
   'quit' to quit

virsh  net-list
Name State  Autostart
-
vdsm-ovirtmgmt   active yes

virsh 




Let's see what our friends in libvir-list think.

Dan.




--
Shu Mingshum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
IBM China Systems and Technology Laboratory


___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


Re: [vdsm] F17's libvirt takes comments into LIBVIRTD_ARGS

2012-05-16 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:05:16PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
 On 2012-5-16 18:46, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
 On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 04:16:11PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
 On 2012-5-14 7:30, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
 On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:51:48PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
 Hi,
Recently, I found that my host in engine was always in a
 unassigned state after the host node was installed.  After looking
 into the vdsm.log,  it seemed that vdsm failed to call libvirt as an
 error,  libvirtError: Cannot write data: Broken pipe.   When I
 started virsh in the host node at that time, a warning was given
 WARNING: no socket to connect to and core dumped with virsh
 net-list.   It looks like that no right socket was created for
 virsh to connect to libvirtd.  Any comments about this problem?  The
 followings are my steps in the node:
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# rpm -qa |grep vdsm
 vdsm-cli-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-python-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.x86_64
 vdsm-reg-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-debug-plugin-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-hook-faqemu-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-bootstrap-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]#
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# ps -ef |grep libvirt
 
 libvirt-daemon-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 libvirt-client-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 libvirt-python-0.9.11-1.fc17.x86_64
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# virsh net-list
 WARNING: no socket to connect to
 Segmentation fault
 I think that merits a libvirt bug. please attach strace output to
 bugzilla.
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]#
 
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# ps -ef |grep vdsm
 root  1299 1  0 23:10 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/libvirtd
 --listen # by vdsm
 The command line of libvirt process is very odd - the comment that vdsm
 puts into /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd is somehow taken verbatim. That's bad,
 and may be related to Fedora 17's systemd services. Try to remove the
 comment and restart libvirtd to see if this is the case.
 The comment come from
 
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd:
 I know that (see my text above). However, in F16 and before, comments have 
 been stripped
 before being passed to commandline. Have you tested if all is well when
 the commment is removed?
 
 I removed the #  by vdsm  line from the config file.  And
 restarted the libvirtd and vdsmd service.
 But no luck to make virsh net-list successful, still got
 Segmentation fault, while virsh -c qemu:///system -r worked.

Thanks. Please strace that segfault, there's a libvirt bug lying there.
And thanks again for finding the vdsm/libvirt configuration problem in
F17.

___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


Re: [vdsm] minutes: today's call

2012-05-16 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
 * Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com [2012-05-07 05:42]:
  On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
   On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I would like to discuss the following on today's call:
 
 1. Gerrit vs. mailing list
   
   Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors.
   One approach to solve this improve gerrit:
   - Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a change. This may
 attract more reviewers.
  
  I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this to upstream
  gerrit:
  https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
  Add unified diff to newchange mail template.
  
 
 Any eta on getting the gerrit notifications of changes to include the
 full patch in the email? 

You can +1 them in googlesource, maybe it helps ;-)

 
 I'm definitely happy to see notification on new posts and changes; helps
 me see what new activity is happening, but I'd really enjoy seeing the
 the patch series attached (via threading) as well.

Itamar, I know Red Hat hates to do it, but can we take these patches to
ovirt's gerrit before they are accepted upstream?

Regards,
Dan.
___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


Re: [vdsm] minutes: today's call

2012-05-16 Thread Itamar Heim

On 05/16/2012 06:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:

* Dan Kenigsbergdan...@redhat.com  [2012-05-07 05:42]:

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:

Hi all,

I would like to discuss the following on today's call:

1. Gerrit vs. mailing list


Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors.
One approach to solve this improve gerrit:
- Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a change. This may
   attract more reviewers.


I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this to upstream
gerrit:
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
Add unified diff to newchange mail template.



Any eta on getting the gerrit notifications of changes to include the
full patch in the email?


You can +1 them in googlesource, maybe it helps ;-)


indeed, please help push them upstream...
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34862/





I'm definitely happy to see notification on new posts and changes; helps
me see what new activity is happening, but I'd really enjoy seeing the
the patch series attached (via threading) as well.


Itamar, I know Red Hat hates to do it, but can we take these patches to
ovirt's gerrit before they are accepted upstream?


yes we can.
after i'll upgrade it to 2.3, which i prefer to do after i return from 
PTO in case there are some issues with the upgrade.
so ETA end of the month for clean upgrade to 2.3, then after we see all 
is ok, let's say another week to upgrade to the version with these patches.




Regards,
Dan.


___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel


Re: [vdsm] [libvirt] F17's libvirt takes comments into LIBVIRTD_ARGS

2012-05-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:45:13PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
 On 2012-5-16 23:35, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# rpm -qa |grep vdsm
 vdsm-cli-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-python-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-hook-vhostmd-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.x86_64
 vdsm-reg-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-debug-plugin-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-hook-faqemu-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch
 vdsm-bootstrap-4.9.6-0.183.git107644d.fc16.shuming1336622293.noarch

[snip]

 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# debuginfo-install libvirt
 Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
 enabling fedora-debuginfo
 enabling updates-debuginfo
 No debuginfo packages available to install
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]# debuginfo-install libvirt --releasever=17
 Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
 enabling fedora-debuginfo
 enabling updates-debuginfo
 No debuginfo packages available to install
 [root@ovirt-node1 ~]#

What is your actual distro ? You see to have a wierd mix of Fedora 16
and Fedora 17 packages here, so I presume you've been installing
custom built packages, or mixing different Fedora repositories

There is definitely a libvirt-debuginfo RPM present in the normal
Fedora 17 repositories.

Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
___
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel