On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > * Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com> [2012-05-07 05:42]: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to discuss the following on today's call: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Gerrit vs. mailing list > > > > > > Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors. > > > One approach to solve this improve gerrit: > > > - Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a change. This may > > > attract more reviewers. > > > > I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this to upstream > > gerrit: > > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/ > > Add unified diff to newchange mail template. > > > > Any eta on getting the gerrit notifications of changes to include the > full patch in the email?
You can +1 them in googlesource, maybe it helps ;-) > > I'm definitely happy to see notification on new posts and changes; helps > me see what new activity is happening, but I'd really enjoy seeing the > the patch series attached (via threading) as well. Itamar, I know Red Hat hates to do it, but can we take these patches to ovirt's gerrit before they are accepted upstream? Regards, Dan. _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
