On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> * Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com> [2012-05-07 05:42]:
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to discuss the following on today's call:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Gerrit vs. mailing list
> > >
> > > Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors.
> > > One approach to solve this improve gerrit:
> > > - Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a change. This may
> > > attract more reviewers.
> > I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this to upstream
> > gerrit:
> > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
> > Add unified diff to newchange mail template.
> Any eta on getting the gerrit notifications of changes to include the
> full patch in the email?
You can +1 them in googlesource, maybe it helps ;-)
> I'm definitely happy to see notification on new posts and changes; helps
> me see what new activity is happening, but I'd really enjoy seeing the
> the patch series attached (via threading) as well.
Itamar, I know Red Hat hates to do it, but can we take these patches to
ovirt's gerrit before they are accepted upstream?
vdsm-devel mailing list