On 05/16/2012 06:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Dan Kenigsberg<dan...@redhat.com> [2012-05-07 05:42]:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to discuss the following on today's call:
1. Gerrit vs. mailing list
Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors.
One approach to solve this improve gerrit:
- Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a change. This may
attract more reviewers.
I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this to upstream
gerrit:
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
Add unified diff to newchange mail template.
Any eta on getting the gerrit notifications of changes to include the
full patch in the email?
You can +1 them in googlesource, maybe it helps ;-)
indeed, please help push them upstream...
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34862/
I'm definitely happy to see notification on new posts and changes; helps
me see what new activity is happening, but I'd really enjoy seeing the
the patch series attached (via threading) as well.
Itamar, I know Red Hat hates to do it, but can we take these patches to
ovirt's gerrit before they are accepted upstream?
yes we can.
after i'll upgrade it to 2.3, which i prefer to do after i return from
PTO in case there are some issues with the upgrade.
so ETA end of the month for clean upgrade to 2.3, then after we see all
is ok, let's say another week to upgrade to the version with these patches.
Regards,
Dan.
_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
