Re: [Engine-devel] http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Design/StablePCIAddresses

2011-12-13 Thread Livnat Peer
On 12/13/2011 11:22 AM, Igor Lvovsky wrote: -Original Message- From: vdsm-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:vdsm-devel- boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Dor Laor Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 10:02 AM To: engine-de...@ovirt.org;

Re: getDeviceList should report partitioned devices, too

2012-01-17 Thread Livnat Peer
On 17/01/12 16:08, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:08:13PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: Hi Lists, One cannot create a PV on a partitioned device, and therefor such devices where not reported to Engine. This proved surprising to users who woder where their LUN disappeared.

Re: getDeviceList should report partitioned devices, too

2012-01-18 Thread Livnat Peer
On 18/01/12 12:44, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:46:17PM +0200, Livnat Peer wrote: On 17/01/12 16:08, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:08:13PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: Hi Lists, One cannot create a PV on a partitioned device, and therefor such devices

Re: getDeviceList should report partitioned devices, too

2012-01-21 Thread Livnat Peer
On 22/01/12 08:28, Eduardo Warszawski wrote: - Original Message - - Original Message - On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:17:53AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote: Can we broaden the scope and also allow passing createVG partitioned devices with an override flag or something? (we'd need

Re: getDeviceList should report partitioned devices, too

2012-01-21 Thread Livnat Peer
On 22/01/12 09:39, Eduardo Warszawski wrote: - Original Message - On 22/01/12 08:28, Eduardo Warszawski wrote: - Original Message - - Original Message - On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 06:17:53AM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote: Can we broaden the scope and also allow passing

Re: getDeviceList should report partitioned devices, too

2012-01-22 Thread Livnat Peer
On 22/01/12 10:05, Eduardo Warszawski wrote: - Original Message - On 22/01/12 09:39, Eduardo Warszawski wrote: - Original Message - On 22/01/12 08:28, Eduardo Warszawski wrote: - Original Message - - Original Message - On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at

Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] [RFC] New Connection Management API

2012-01-25 Thread Livnat Peer
On 25/01/12 16:20, Adam Litke wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 04:54:10PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: Nitty Gritty: This seems like a good API but I have some suggestions with respect to API naming: manageStorageServer === Could we name this manageStorageConnection or

Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] [RFC] New Connection Management API

2012-01-26 Thread Livnat Peer
clean and simple API, but at the end of the day if the users of the API don't think it is clean and simple you missed your goal. - Original Message - From: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, engine-de...@ovirt.org

Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] [RFC] New Connection Management API

2012-01-28 Thread Livnat Peer
On 26/01/12 23:42, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: - Original Message - From: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com To: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com Cc: Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com, engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 3:16:32 PM Subject

Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] [RFC] New Connection Management API

2012-01-28 Thread Livnat Peer
On 28/01/12 04:50, Itamar Heim wrote: top posting since there was a long thread on this anyway. some questions/comments: 1. about the CIDs - it sounds like the engine needs to persist this info, so it can resume normally in case of a failure/restart (this is different than today, when the

Re: [vdsm] [Users] How to peek inside the XML-RPC

2012-02-22 Thread Livnat Peer
On 22/02/12 08:36, Deepak C Shetty wrote: Hi, Asking this on both the ovirt and vdsm mailing lists. What is the right way to get a debug output or dump of the XML-RPC that is being sent between ovirt and vdsm, either from the ovirt side and/or from the vdsm side ? Is there any way of

Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] Is there a preferred workflow when adding additional error messages to VDSM _and_ Engine?

2012-04-09 Thread Livnat Peer
On 07/04/12 18:10, Lee Yarwood wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I'm currently working on a patch to correct the logic used by vdsm when reviewing the logical and physical block size of physical volumes [1]. Once/If this is approved I'd like to look into

Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] reserve virtio-balloon device created by libvirt

2012-05-01 Thread Livnat Peer
On 01/05/12 01:28, Dor Laor wrote: On 04/30/2012 07:30 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 04/29/2012 04:19 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Andrew Cathrow wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Kenigsbergdan...@redhat.com To: Gal Hammergham...@redhat.com

[vdsm] ovirt network

2012-08-06 Thread Livnat Peer
-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY TRANSP:OPAQUE LAST-MODIFIED:20120806T073421Z DTSTAMP:20120806T073421Z SEQUENCE:0 DESCRIPTION:The following is a new meeting request:\n\nSubject: ovirt networ k \nOrganiser: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com \n\nTime: Wednesday\, 15 Au gust\, 2012\, 4:00:00 PM - 5:00:00 PM GMT +02:00

Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] Network related hooks in vdsm

2012-10-16 Thread Livnat Peer
On 10/10/12 16:47, Igor Lvovsky wrote: Hi everyone, As you know vdsm has hooks mechanism and we already support dozen of hooks for different needs. Now it's a network's time. We would like to get your comments regarding our proposition for network related hooks. In general we are

Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] Network related hooks in vdsm

2012-10-16 Thread Livnat Peer
On 16/10/12 08:52, Mike Kolesnik wrote: - Original Message - On 10/10/12 16:47, Igor Lvovsky wrote: Hi everyone, As you know vdsm has hooks mechanism and we already support dozen of hooks for different needs. Now it's a network's time. We would like to get your comments regarding

Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] unmanaged devices thrown into 'custom' feature

2012-10-21 Thread Livnat Peer
On 21/10/12 16:42, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: I have just noticed that when a VM is started for the second time, Engine issues the create vdsm verb with some information regarding unmanaged devices (an example is shown below[1]) in the 'custom' propery bag. I'm surprised about this, as I was not

[vdsm] Cancelled: ovirt network

2012-10-24 Thread Livnat Peer
-ID;TZID=Asia/Jerusalem:20121024T16 LAST-MODIFIED:20121024T132456Z DTSTAMP:20121024T132456Z SEQUENCE:2 DESCRIPTION:A single instance of the following meeting has been cancelled:\n \nSubject: ovirt network \nOrganiser: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com \n\n Time: Wednesday\, 24 October\, 2012\, 4:00

Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration

2012-11-14 Thread Livnat Peer
On 14/11/12 00:28, Adam Litke wrote: On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 09:46:43AM -0500, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com To: vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:07:30 PM Subject: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network

Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration - Thread mid-summary

2012-11-26 Thread Livnat Peer
On 26/11/12 03:15, Shu Ming wrote: Livnat, Thanks for your summary. I got comments below. 2012-11-25 18:53, Livnat Peer: Hi All, We have been discussing $subject for a while and I'd like to summarized what we agreed and disagreed on thus far. The way I see it there are two related

Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration - Thread mid-summary

2012-11-27 Thread Livnat Peer
On 26/11/12 16:59, Adam Litke wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:57:19PM +0200, Livnat Peer wrote: On 26/11/12 03:15, Shu Ming wrote: Livnat, Thanks for your summary. I got comments below. 2012-11-25 18:53, Livnat Peer: Hi All, We have been discussing $subject for a while and I'd like

Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration - Thread mid-summary

2012-11-27 Thread Livnat Peer
On 27/11/12 10:53, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: - Original Message - From: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com To: Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com Cc: Alon Bar-Lev abar...@redhat.com, VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:42:00 AM Subject: Re

[vdsm] ovirt network monthly sync meeting - Agenda

2012-11-27 Thread Livnat Peer
Hi All, We have a scheduled sync meeting on oVirt network today. We did not set an agenda for this meeting yet so I'll postpone it for next week. Please respond to this note with agenda items. If there are no agenda items by December 5th, I'll cancel the call. Thanks, Livnat

[vdsm] ovirt network

2012-11-27 Thread Livnat Peer
:20121128T16 LAST-MODIFIED:20121128T071446Z DTSTAMP:20121128T071446Z SEQUENCE:2 DESCRIPTION:A single instance of the following meeting has been modified:\n\ nSubject: ovirt network \nOrganiser: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com \n\nT ime: Wednesday\, 5 December\, 2012\, 4:00:00 PM - 5:00:00 PM GMT +02

Re: [vdsm] link state semantics

2012-12-05 Thread Livnat Peer
On 05/12/12 14:21, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:10:00PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:32:34PM -0500, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: Hi list! We are working on the new 3.2 feature for adding support for updating VM devices, more specifically at the

Re: [vdsm] Fwd: Bonding, bridges and ifcfg

2012-12-10 Thread Livnat Peer
...@redhat.com To: Antoni Segura Puimedon asegu...@redhat.com Cc: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com, Igor Lvovsky ilvov...@redhat.com Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:03:48 PM Subject: Re: Bonding, ifcfg and luck On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 06:47:58AM -0500, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: Hi all, I

[vdsm] Cancelled: ovirt network

2013-06-12 Thread Livnat Peer
/Jerusalem:20120815T17 STATUS:CANCELLED CLASS:PUBLIC X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY TRANSP:OPAQUE LAST-MODIFIED:20130612T174006Z DTSTAMP:20130612T174006Z SEQUENCE:2 DESCRIPTION:The following meeting has been cancelled:\n\nSubject: ovirt netw ork \nOrganizer: Livnat Peer lp...@redhat.com \n

Re: [vdsm] Smarter network_setup hooks

2014-01-05 Thread Livnat Peer
On 01/05/2014 12:05 PM, Assaf Muller wrote: Whichever way we decide to do this, I think the important bit is documentation - We have to make sure to update the oVirt wiki hooks pages. If users aren't aware of how to retrieve the networking config then we might as well not implement it.