On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:25:23PM +0800, Mark Wu wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> I think people always test their patch before submitting, so
> explicitly setting "verified" is not necessary. More importantly,
> "verified" by the committer is not convincible //enough for code
> quality assurance. Wha
* Mark Wu [2012-05-09 04:58]:
> Hi Guys,
> I think people always test their patch before submitting, so
> explicitly setting "verified" is not necessary. More importantly,
> "verified" by the committer is not convincible //enough for code
> quality assurance. What's your opinion?
I be
Hi Guys,
I think people always test their patch before submitting, so
explicitly setting "verified" is not necessary. More importantly,
"verified" by the committer is not convincible //enough for code
quality assurance. What's your opinion?
Thanks!
Mark.
___
