Re: [Engine-devel] Announcing a proof of concept REST API for VDSM

2011-11-30 Thread Keith Robertson
On 11/30/2011 10:50 AM, Adam Litke wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:32:41PM +0100, Geert Jansen wrote: >> On 11/30/2011 04:09 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: >> How easy is QMF to consume from a software development perspective? Would it be easy for someone to write a virsh-like tool again

Re: [vdsm] flowID schema

2012-02-09 Thread Keith Robertson
On 02/09/2012 12:18 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote: - Original Message - From: "Ayal Baron" To: "Dan Kenigsberg" Cc: "VDSM Project Development" Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 10:35:54 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] flowID schema - Original Message - On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:32:49AM -050

Re: [vdsm] flowID schema

2012-02-12 Thread Keith Robertson
On 02/12/2012 02:50 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:19PM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote: - Original Message - -1 I agree that for messaging environment having a Message ID is a must because you sometimes don't have a particular target so when you get a response you ne

Re: [vdsm] flowID schema

2012-02-13 Thread Keith Robertson
On 02/13/2012 07:28 AM, Ayal Baron wrote: Technically I disagree, this is a cross cutting concern which has nothing to do with any specific call hence it should be passed as a header, that is actually rather elegant. Overloading a header with this? Seems like a clunky bolt on to me. Further,

Re: [vdsm] flowID schema

2012-02-20 Thread Keith Robertson
On 02/19/2012 05:32 AM, Ayal Baron wrote: FlowID does absolutely nothing towards that end. What is required for that (and should indeed be done) is work on improving the existing logs: 1. reduce verbosity 2. make sure that required points in the flow are logged 3. improve log messages Don't fo

Re: [vdsm] Review Request: libvdsm schema updates

2012-09-28 Thread Keith Robertson
What, no XSD(s)? :) - Original Message - > From: "Adam Litke" > To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 5:40:48 PM > Subject: [vdsm] Review Request: libvdsm schema updates > > Hi vdsm developers! > > This is a plea for review of my libvdsm schema updates

Proposal to add message IDs to vdsm.log

2011-10-05 Thread Keith Robertson
Hi, I would like to propose enhancing the VDSM source to emit message IDs in log messages with levels greater than DEBUG (i.e. INFO, ERROR, WARN, EXCEPTION, and CRITICAL). Messages IDs have been used successfully in many products and they can aid in debugging, documentation, root cause analysi

Re: Proposal to add message IDs to vdsm.log

2011-10-06 Thread Keith Robertson
The substitution variable "woweee" doesn't get translated or picked up by gettext because it isn't surrounded by _(...) which is what you want. 2. The message ID (i.e. VDSM1000) doesn't get translated either for the same reason. Cheers, Keith On 10/06/2011 10:0

Re: Proposal to add message IDs to vdsm.log

2011-10-06 Thread Keith Robertson
On 10/06/2011 12:14 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: > On Thu 06 Oct 2011 05:22:02 PM IST, Keith Robertson wrote: >> Message IDs do require some discipline on the part of the developer >> to ensure uniqueness. They also force the developer to think about >> whether or not the text

Re: Proposal to add message IDs to vdsm.log

2011-10-06 Thread Keith Robertson
On 10/06/2011 01:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 10/06/2011 12:18 PM, Keith Robertson wrote: >> On 10/06/2011 12:14 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: >>> On Thu 06 Oct 2011 05:22:02 PM IST, Keith Robertson wrote: >>>> Message IDs do require some discipline on the part o

Re: Proposal to add message IDs to vdsm.log

2011-10-06 Thread Keith Robertson
On 10/06/2011 03:11 PM, Ayal Baron wrote: I would like to propose enhancing the VDSM source to emit message IDs in log messages with levels greater than DEBUG (i.e. INFO, ERROR, WARN, EXCEPTION, and CRITICAL). Messages IDs have been used >>>

Re: Proposal to add message IDs to vdsm.log

2011-10-07 Thread Keith Robertson
e explanations right away though and I definitely don't want to put any bad explanations up or ones that haven't been vetted. Cheers, Keith On 10/06/2011 03:29 PM, Keith Robertson wrote: > On 10/06/2011 03:11 PM, Ayal Baron wrote: >>>>>>>>> I would like to

Re: Proposal to add message IDs to vdsm.log

2011-10-10 Thread Keith Robertson
On 10/09/2011 05:53 PM, Ayal Baron wrote: > > - Original Message - >> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:28:17AM -0400, Keith Robertson wrote: >>> OK, unless anyone has anything else to add I'm going to assume that >>> the >>> project maintainer

Re: Proposal to add message IDs to vdsm.log

2011-10-10 Thread Keith Robertson
On 10/10/2011 08:44 AM, Ayal Baron wrote: > > - Original Message - >> On 10/09/2011 05:53 PM, Ayal Baron wrote: >>> - Original Message - >>>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:28:17AM -0400, Keith Robertson wrote: >>>>> OK, unless any