[vdsm] Support for stateless nodes

2012-02-22 Thread Mike Burns
There has been a lot of interest in being able to run stateless Nodes with ovirt-engine. ovirt-node has designed a way [1] to achieve this on the node side, but we need input from the engine and vdsm teams to see if we're missing some requirement or if there needs to be changes on the engine/vdsm

Re: [vdsm] [node-devel] Support for stateless nodes

2012-02-22 Thread Mike Burns
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:33 +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote: > On 22/02/12 16:57, Mike Burns wrote: > > There has been a lot of interest in being able to run stateless Nodes > > with ovirt-engine. ovirt-node has designed a way [1] to achieve this on > > the node side, but we need

Re: [vdsm] [node-devel] Support for stateless nodes

2012-02-22 Thread Mike Burns
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:59 +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote: > On 22/02/12 17:33, Doron Fediuck wrote: > > On 22/02/12 16:57, Mike Burns wrote: > >> There has been a lot of interest in being able to run stateless Nodes > >> with ovirt-engine. ovirt-node has designed a

Re: [vdsm] [node-devel] Support for stateless nodes

2012-02-22 Thread Mike Burns
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 18:10 +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote: > On 22/02/12 17:58, Mike Burns wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:33 +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote: > >> On 22/02/12 16:57, Mike Burns wrote: > > > > vdsm-reg runs on *every* boot anyway and renames the bridg

Re: [vdsm] code sign-off/DCO for ovirt projects

2012-04-10 Thread Mike Burns
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 11:57 +0300, Itamar Heim wrote: > top posting to make sure this is visible: > touched based with danken and enabled this for vdsm project. > if there are any issues/more time needed for adjustment, will disable > and re-enable. > > http://gerrit.googlecode.com/svn/documentat

Re: [vdsm] [Users] Host missing cpuFlags

2012-05-04 Thread Mike Burns
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:34 +0300, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 05/04/2012 02:26 PM, Nicholas Kesick wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 08:14:14 +0300 > > > From: ih...@redhat.com > > > To: cybertimber2...@hotmail.com > > > CC: us...@ovirt.org > > > Subject: Re: [Users] Host missing cpuFlag

Re: [vdsm] [node-devel] Still not abel to migrate to node

2012-05-09 Thread Mike Burns
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 17:07 +0200, Michel van Horssen wrote: > Some extra info: > > If I go into virsh on the engine/vdsm and type connect > qemu+tls://192.168.10.79/system I get: > > error: unable to connect to server at '192.168.10.79:16514': Connection > refused > > (192.168.10.79 is the no

[vdsm] ATTN: Project Maintainers: Code Freeze/Branch/Beta Build deadlines

2013-01-09 Thread Mike Burns
* ovirt-node * ovirt-node-iso * vdsm Thanks Mike Burns [1] This is only necessary if the package is *not* already in fedora repos (must be in actual fedora repos, not just updates-testing or koji) [2] Communicate with mburns, mgoldboi, oschreib to deliver the packages [3] ovirt-node-iso

Re: [vdsm] which vdsm version for 3.2?

2013-01-17 Thread Mike Burns
Dan Kenigsberg CC: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org; Ofer Schreiber ; Moran Goldboim ; Mike Burns ; Yaniv Bronheim ; Barak Azulay Subject: Re: which vdsm version for 3.2?___ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.

Re: [vdsm] which vdsm version for 3.2?

2013-01-23 Thread Mike Burns
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 08:49 -0500, Douglas Landgraf wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/19/2013 02:08 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:18:02PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote: > >> On 01/17/2013 04:15 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20:12PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote:

[vdsm] Nightly builds of vdsm in jenkins need NVR bump

2013-05-17 Thread Mike Burns
Hi Dan, Federico, I noticed that the current jenkins builds of vdsm have an NVR like vdsm-4.10.3-0.xx while the current stable version is 4.10.3-10.x. This means that someone testing nightly builds for oVirt 3.3 will always get the stable version from either ovirt.org or Fedora repos

Re: [vdsm] Nightly builds of vdsm in jenkins need NVR bump

2013-05-18 Thread Mike Burns
On 05/18/2013 05:27 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 01:51:20PM -0400, Mike Burns wrote: Hi Dan, Federico, I noticed that the current jenkins builds of vdsm have an NVR like vdsm-4.10.3-0.xx while the current stable version is 4.10.3-10.x. This means that someone

Re: [vdsm] Nightly builds of vdsm in jenkins need NVR bump

2013-05-18 Thread Mike Burns
On 05/18/2013 05:44 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 05:31:21PM -0400, Mike Burns wrote: On 05/18/2013 05:27 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 01:51:20PM -0400, Mike Burns wrote: Hi Dan, Federico, I noticed that the current jenkins builds of vdsm have an NVR

Re: [vdsm] vdsm version 4.10.3-17

2013-06-13 Thread Mike Burns
On 06/13/2013 06:30 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 06:53:48PM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: Hi, VDSM version 4.10.3-17 is available. Please help providing votes from your tests on koji's website to make it stable as soon as possible for F18. (required 3). Changes

Re: [vdsm] [Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-06-17

2013-07-18 Thread Mike Burns
On 07/18/2013 11:59 AM, Doron Fediuck wrote: - Original Message - | From: "Dan Kenigsberg" | To: "Mike Burns" , vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org | Cc: bo...@ovirt.org, "users" | Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 6:31:52 PM | Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt Weekly

Re: [vdsm] [ATN] vdsm yum install is missing pkg for centos & f18

2013-09-30 Thread Mike Burns
On 09/30/2013 11:53 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 04:11:56AM -0400, Eyal Edri wrote: fyi, as part of adding more verification jobs on vdsm, infra recently added a new job [1] that installs vdsm. currently that job is working only on f19 and fails on f18 and centos64[2]: Ar

Re: [vdsm] vdsm sync meeting - October 7th 2013

2013-10-09 Thread Mike Burns
On 10/08/2013 04:52 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: On 10/08/2013 05:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:25:22PM +0100, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: We had an unpleasant talk, hampered by statics and disconnection on danken's side. Beyond the noises I've managed to recognize

Re: [vdsm] vdsm-4.12.1-4

2013-10-10 Thread Mike Burns
On 10/10/2013 10:12 AM, Mike Burns wrote: On 10/10/2013 10:20 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: Changes: = - remoteFileHandler: Add create exclusive option for truncateFile (BZ#979193) - oop: improve safety for truncateFile F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID

Re: [vdsm] vdsm-4.12.1-4

2013-10-10 Thread Mike Burns
On 10/10/2013 10:20 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: Changes: = - remoteFileHandler: Add create exclusive option for truncateFile (BZ#979193) - oop: improve safety for truncateFile F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6046682 F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koj

Re: [vdsm] vdsm-4.13.0-2.gitbae164c build - branch: ovirt-3.3

2013-10-18 Thread Mike Burns
On 10/17/2013 11:24 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: Available at: F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6070401 F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6070422 EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6070471 Posted to beta repo. Can you

Re: [vdsm] [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms

2013-11-12 Thread Mike Burns
On 11/12/2013 03:51 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: Hi Patrick, On 11/12/2013 09:33 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto: Hi all, sorry for this rant, but... Thanks for ranting.

Re: [Engine-devel] New version of git-request-review

2011-11-15 Thread Mike Burns
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 11:51 +0200, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: > I just finished a version of my git-request-review script. > > For those who are not yet using it it's meant to make sending patches > to gerrit more streamlined. > It show you a list of the patches before sending them and also warns > you

Re: [Users] ovirt-node on Gentoo

2011-11-21 Thread Mike Burns
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 07:42 -0500, Ayal Baron wrote: > > - Original Message - > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:58:29PM +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > Well, it looks like we've hit our first distro-diversion. > > > > > > First of all, let's define the issues, and then see h