Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 7.0 OpsCenter

2011-06-10 Thread Rusty.Major
There is no difference in doing an Incremental restore versus a Full. Doing a restore does not suspend the scheduler, so I am unsure why that message is coming up, but make sure nbpem is running. In my experience (mostly prior to 7.0.1), nbpem can be down and you just won't see any jobs queue

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup to VTL fast with first tape then slow thereafter

2011-06-09 Thread Rusty.Major
Try looking at the BPTM and BPDM logs (T for Tape, D for Disk). I don't know if a VTL will go to TM or DM...I would assume TM since NBU thinks it's a tape still. Sounds fishy since it changes drastically after the second 'tape' is mounted. Have you searched to see if there is a known issue?

Re: [Veritas-bu] Open file backup error

2011-06-08 Thread Rusty.Major
Hey Bob, it's not FUD. VSP has been problematic since, I don't know, 4.5? It would fail to release the lock on the file and therefore you would end up with GB files filling up the filesystems which sometimes required a reboot to be able to delete. It didn't happen consistently, but it was

Re: [Veritas-bu] Image Cleanup hangs

2011-06-08 Thread Rusty.Major
Sounds to me like image cleanup doesn't like something with a particular client's image. As you know, when /usr/openv fills up, nasty things can happen, including corrupt/incomplete catalog entries. I couldn't find a specific technote that addresses this in my quick search, but this one may

Re: [Veritas-bu] Server Not seen in Device Config Wizard - Help please :-(

2011-06-08 Thread Rusty.Major
Try nbemmcmd -listhosts -verbose I would expect that you would see an entry for NODE03 with an alias or something for HOME1. You can add/change existing entries, so I believe all you'll need to do is remove HOME1 from NODE03 and then you can add it as a comletely new san media server. You may

Re: [Veritas-bu] Open file backup error

2011-06-07 Thread Rusty.Major
First, don't bother using VSP. It has known issues and eventually goes away in version 7.x. In addtion to all the other suggestions, take a look at the Windows Event Log for any VSS errors. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge

Re: [Veritas-bu] Best way to do ESXi 4.1 backup by VeritasNetbackup.

2011-06-01 Thread Rusty.Major
I'll state first that we use a capacity based licensing model, so I've been out of the loop for a few years on licenses and all that (thank goodness!). The VMware backup host can be a Client, Media Server, or even a Master. All it has to have is access to the datastore(s) and configured in

Re: [Veritas-bu] VM File Level Backups and not Full VMDK withfilelevel rest

2011-06-01 Thread Rusty.Major
Mikhail, I'm not following what you're saying. NBU can restore granular files from a CBT enabled backup. How does Avamar differ from that? Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693 Keeping

Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 61, Issue 28

2011-05-20 Thread Rusty.Major
Not to be crass, but have you even tried looking at the Symantec NetBackup support website, or even using google? www.symantec.com There's a Deduplication guide, there's a guide about PureDisk theres probably some information in the Admin I and Admin II guides. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU Server Upgrade

2011-05-19 Thread Rusty.Major
Here's what we do for a UNIX (Solaris) server refresh. -Install NBU and patch to the same level on the new server -Make a final catalog and system backup of the old server -Shut down NBU on old system -Use tar and some other OS tricks to do a simultaneous tar and copy to the remote machine -Swap

Re: [Veritas-bu] RMAN and NetBackup Question

2011-05-16 Thread Rusty.Major
Patrick, It's ALWAYS someone else's fault. Haven't you learned that by now? Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693 Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU not seeing tape in tape drive

2011-05-11 Thread Rusty.Major
If you do an import on a piece of media that is already recognized, you will get an error saying it's already there and/or the images that it found are already there. You won't get the error you are reporting, this sounds more hardware/configuraiton related, to me. Try running the device

Re: [Veritas-bu] REQUIRED_INTERFACE, anyone using private backup networks?

2011-05-11 Thread Rusty.Major
I've never liked REQUIRED_INTERFACE as it seems to be problematic. Perhaps it's just me. Most of our NBU servers have at least 3 networks (backup network, mgmt network and metadata/intra-nbu network). We use multiple host file entries with the different interface names and corresponding

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.0 / Windows 2008 R2 / Hyper-V

2011-05-06 Thread Rusty.Major
One of the later 6.5.x patches is what you're looking for. 6.5.5 or 6.5.6, I'm not sure. The info you are looking for can be found in the OS Compatibility Guide: http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=contentid=TECH52878key=15143 It's under Compatibility Lists almost at the bottom.

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 media server backup issue

2011-05-06 Thread Rusty.Major
When we've encountered these issues and the logs were no help, we had to narrow down the problem by creating multiple backups or streams. This approach allowed us to narrow down the culprit by eventually closing in on a bad file during the backup. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup for vSphere 4

2011-05-02 Thread Rusty.Major
I have one environment where I've tried NBD and it was just as fast (or should I say slow?) as SAN based backups. They were running at about 50MB/s and I believe the bottleneck is the storage array where the VMDKs are housed. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard

Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade and Migration

2011-04-25 Thread Rusty.Major
I prefer to go the other way, migrate to new platform first, then upgrade NBU. The migration is more problematic, IMO. Either way you go, I suggest letting it cook for a period of time so you can work out any kinks. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple copies option in Netbackup

2011-04-21 Thread Rusty.Major
SLP will guarantee that the subsequent copies get completed before expiring the original backup image (copy 1). With normal duplication or inline tape copies, you don't get this level of protection. Once the initial backup is completed, the impact of duplication is on the media server, not the

Re: [Veritas-bu] SUN TRUNKING SW WITH NETBACKUP

2011-04-21 Thread Rusty.Major
We use aggr without issues on most of our media servers. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693 Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪ http://availability.sungard.com/ P Think before

Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup

2011-04-14 Thread Rusty.Major
I wouldn't recommend a VTL with NBU at all as NBU works extremely well using Disk Pools/Disk Staging Storage Units. Making your disk look like a bunch of tape drives just adds more management and complexity and defeats the purpose of disk, IMO. On a side note, because SLPs and OST work

Re: [Veritas-bu] catalog performance

2011-04-11 Thread Rusty.Major
The question to ask is if you are seeing (or suspect) any degraded performance due to high catalog activity? If you aren't, then I wouldn't worry about the cost or complexity of splitting up your catalog. Our catalog components are not split up, but we do dedicate a separate RAID 10 (FC disk)

Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5

2011-04-04 Thread Rusty.Major
With this little bit of information it sounds like you might have a configuration mismatch with what nbu thinks the drive path is and what it really is on the OS. Check the OS's path for that drive and compare that to what nbu has. If that's not it, you may have some hardware issue with the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows Server and Linux Clients

2011-04-01 Thread Rusty.Major
Hi James, The colon and the backslashes in this path: can’t create file: usr:\local\pathname\to\file (WIN32 3:The system cannot find the path specified.) have me concerned. AFAIK, this is not a valid path in Linux and I would expect to see something like /usr/local/pathname/to/file instead.

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5 client backing up to NBU 7 Master Media

2011-04-01 Thread Rusty.Major
Symantec supports the current and two major revisions back of the client. So, in your case, 7.0.x will support 7.0 clients, 6.5 clients and 6.0 clients. This isn't to say this will not work, and even Symantec states that though it's not supported, it still may work just fine. In fact, if it's

Re: [Veritas-bu] strange disk usage

2011-04-01 Thread Rusty.Major
That's the only thing I can think of, too (other than logs, but that would be more of a gradual increase than all at once, I would think). Keep in mind that catalog compression will keep the catalog compressed until someone needs to search that data, such as for a restore or bplist. The image

Re: [Veritas-bu] /usr/openv/pack*

2011-03-07 Thread Rusty.Major
I try to only keep one previous patch revision in the pack directory. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693 Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪ http://availability.sungard.com/ P

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5 acting buggy

2011-02-24 Thread Rusty.Major
If you get low on space, EMM will shut down to save the database from corruption. I believe the default is 1% free, but can't remember. There will be a log entry in the emm log stating this was the case. This sounds like what could have been happening here because you could access at least the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Archive and Restore taking forever on DR server

2011-02-09 Thread Rusty.Major
It also sounds like a name resolution problem. You could put an entry for Server-A pointing to the recovery server's IP address in hosts. Probably would be easier to just fix the name resolution issue as when you go to the next server you will most likely have the same problem. Good luck!

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Archive and Restore taking forever on DR server

2011-02-09 Thread Rusty.Major
Another thought: If this is version 7.0.1, there is a hostname caching 'feature' now in NetBackup (Which I do NOT like, Symantec!!!). It caches the IP for each host configured in NBU and sometimes this can result in the incorrect IP being tied to the hostname. The default TTL for this cached

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Archive and Restore taking forever on DR server

2011-02-09 Thread Rusty.Major
You can keep the Java UI from trying to reach out to all hosts when you hit Host PropertiesClients by changing or adding the following parameter in the setconf.bat file: SET FORCE_IPADDR_LOOKUP=0 I'm not sure what, if any, setting there is for the Win Admin Console. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Vmware backups under 7.0

2011-02-08 Thread Rusty.Major
Same here. Works really well. The only thing I am having concerns with are the speeds that we're seeing so far. We are getting about 35MB/s from each VM. What speeds are others seeing? My only caution would be that you should be VERY careful when you present the datastore LUNs to the VM

Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgradation, Consolidation and then Migration :-Few Questions 5.1 to 6.5, windows 2k to win2k8

2011-02-04 Thread Rusty.Major
One step to make it a bit easier: Instead of upgrading the media server and then migrating media to the master, why don't you migrate the media to the master at version 5.1, decomm that media server and THEN upgrade to 6.5 and 7.0? Less upgrade work with the same result. I have migrated to new

Re: [Veritas-bu] vStorage Backups - Possible loss of VMFS?

2011-02-04 Thread Rusty.Major
I have done this on two different NBU Domains and on each domain the VMware backup host was a 2008 64bit Media Server. When presenting the LUNs, Windows did not try to mount them or write signatures. They come up as Healthy but showing as Offline, which is how you want them. I made no changes

[Veritas-bu] NBU 7 Upgrade and Changing Settings?

2011-01-14 Thread Rusty.Major
Hi all, I've upgraded two sites from 6.5.6 to NBU 7.0.1 (Solaris 10 SPARC) and have noticed that some settings are getting changed to the defaults. Some of the settings that I think are being changed (because I don't have proof): Clean-up Logging Priorities And I know for sure that

[Veritas-bu] Client Side Dedupe Backup Size

2011-01-12 Thread Rusty.Major
Hi all, When using the NBU7 client dedupe feature, how is Activity Monitor / bpdbjobs reporting the amount of data backed up? Is it how much was really sent over the wire after deduping or is it what would have been backed up if there were no dedupe (i.e. a traditional backup size)? Thanks,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade to 7.0 and licenses

2011-01-12 Thread Rusty.Major
I have upgraded two sites over the past week and we did not upgrade our licenses to 7.0 and everything appears to be working just fine. We are utilizing Advanced Disk (DiskPools and SLP), Enterprise Clients, Exchange, SQL, Oracle, NDMP, etc. As Ed stated, you SHOULD try to get your new keys or

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6 to Netbackup7

2011-01-12 Thread Rusty.Major
I would agree. Take note, for Solaris, you need to be at Solaris10 Update 4 or higher. I don't know if the install will fail if you try to upgrade, but I went ahead and patched the OS before doing the upgrade. Not hard, but it took 4-5 hours for each server and they are all T2000's. Rusty

[Veritas-bu] SAP and Encryption

2010-12-14 Thread Rusty.Major
Is anyone utilizing NBU client based encryption with SAP backups? I can't find anything that definitively states either way or how to configure it. Thanks, Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪

[Veritas-bu] Blank Hostnames in VMware Client Browse Windows in Policy

2010-12-09 Thread Rusty.Major
Can anyone explain why when trying to setup a policy for 4 new VMs, all I get in the client browse window (when trying to add the new clients to the policy) are 4 gray icons with an empty space for the name? I select them and get an error that they cannot be added with a blank hostname. They

Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging to tape

2010-11-19 Thread Rusty.Major
If that's what you want to do, then Nic's suggestion is the best for you. It's also probably the cheapest as SLP requires Advanced Disk and associated licensing. However, if you want to use SLP in that manner, then you will have to utilize cron to disable and enable SLP for the times you want

Re: [Veritas-bu] Selection List Break Up

2010-11-17 Thread Rusty.Major
I do the same thing: Create a policy with ALD and exclude everything you've created separate policies/file selections for. We actually do this more often than I'd like, but it does seem to work out very well. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services

Re: [Veritas-bu] VTL to FAS conversion

2010-10-26 Thread Rusty.Major
I think your plan is good and will surprise you in its simplicity. IMO, the more smaller LUNs will be more of a problem to manage on the server as filesystems, unless you're going to wrap them up with VxVM or something similar. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard

Re: [Veritas-bu] Getting a handle on vault eject info

2010-10-25 Thread Rusty.Major
It may be that you are dup'ing so many jobs at once (high number of write drives) that vault grabs fresh tapes and isn't filling them up. It may take you longer to fill them up because the tapes are in use elsewhere and it would have to wait. How much data are you actually duplicating and on

Re: [Veritas-bu] Vault, waiting for resource

2010-10-14 Thread Rusty.Major
Ahh yes, good one Nic, I had forgot about that. Here is a blog entry with more details: http://netbackup.wordpress.com/2009/03/22/media-in-use-when-it-really-isnt/ Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup DeDupe I/O Requirements

2010-10-13 Thread Rusty.Major
I don't have any personal experience on this, but have been told that SATA will work fine for dedupe. Data Domain and the new NetBackup appliances, and I'm sure all of the other dedupe hardware vendors, use SATA drives. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability

Re: [Veritas-bu] How dedup replication controlled by nbu

2010-10-13 Thread Rusty.Major
The API that makes it happen is OST and the 'scheduler', if you will, is a Storage Lifecycle Policy. The high level configuration is to setup two storage servers, two disk pools, and two storage units (one for each dedup device). You then configure a Storage Lifecycle Policy to do the initial

Re: [Veritas-bu] D2D or Tape Libraries

2010-10-11 Thread Rusty.Major
You're probably running into disk IO issues with all of the other data. Are you reading the data off the same EVA array that you are writing it to? Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693

Re: [Veritas-bu] D2D or Tape Libraries

2010-10-08 Thread Rusty.Major
We have appx 1.2PB spread out across 9 NBU domains that we use just for a backup target. The goal is to have 7-10 days of all backup images available on disk at these larger sites. These arrays are all mid-range, big vendor names, all SATA and can handle running 150 or so jobs simultaneously.

Re: [Veritas-bu] D2D or Tape Libraries

2010-10-08 Thread Rusty.Major
Thanks, Wayne. I didn't mean to exclude any vendors. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693 Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪ http://availability.sungard.com/ P Think before you

Re: [Veritas-bu] D2D or Tape Libraries

2010-10-07 Thread Rusty.Major
We have several D2D2T system currently, running Advanced Disk and SLPs. I would never go back if I had the choice. There's nothing wrong with disk, in fact it cures many of the ills of a tape system, like slow backups which kill tape drives, speed to restore, etc. Even with dedupe, tape is

[Veritas-bu] DataDomain Optimized Duplication Failures

2010-10-07 Thread Rusty.Major
I'm having issues with Data Domain optimized duplication and wondered if anyone here had seen any issues like this. I've got a case with both Symantec and DataDomain but thought I'd check here too. Environment: NBU 7.0 on Linux RHEL5, Nine Windows 2008 R2 Media servers (Master and Medias are

Re: [Veritas-bu] VTL Recommendations

2010-09-27 Thread Rusty.Major
I would recommend moving away from the Virtual Tape Library and utilizing Advanced Disk, Disk Pools and Storage LifeCycle Policies. Most VTLs today can be utilized as a giant pool of disks, instead of a bunch of fake tape drives, as well. But, at that point, you could remove the complication

Re: [Veritas-bu] need help with mass tape copy

2010-09-23 Thread Rusty.Major
If you have all the tapes in the library, or at least all the tapes that the images span, then yes, NBU will work it all out for you. If not you'll have to get tapes in quickly. This is what Ed was alluding to with a lot of groundwork. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪

Re: [Veritas-bu] Policy kicking off again after a successful backupandgetting 196 errors.

2010-09-21 Thread Rusty.Major
I would agree to try to patch as there were some issues with the early releases and calendar based scheds. Calendar scheduling is the bane of NetBackup engineering. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX

Re: [Veritas-bu] Can I duplicate existing netbackup images using a brand new SLP

2010-09-18 Thread Rusty.Major
Mark, No, SLPs are only aware of the backups they make, so you can't do what you're looking for unless it does the initial backup. I would find that very handy as well, so I hope Symantec is listening. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757

Re: [Veritas-bu] Script

2010-09-18 Thread Rusty.Major
I don't have a script, but for those that might, it would be helpful to know what platform you're on. Unix can use iostat -xzn # (where # is the interval). Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪

Re: [Veritas-bu] Need help!

2010-09-18 Thread Rusty.Major
Firewall? Try to telnet hostname vnetd from the client to the Master and Media servers. You can also try using this command: bptestbpcd -client clientname -debug Run this from Master and Media servers. Debug gives you the most output and isn't documented, -verbose gives you a little less

Re: [Veritas-bu] Alternate Network Interfaces

2010-09-14 Thread Rusty.Major
I would agree, try bonding/teaming the NICs together to get more bandwidth. Don't forget to investigate your network to make sure that you don't have any other bottlenecks inline and that the clients are all set to 100/full (assuming they are 100Mbit). Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

2010-09-02 Thread Rusty.Major
It sounds like you have some jobs that are not destaging properly. I saw this whith 5.1 jobs after I upgraded from 5.1 to 6.5 and had to manually expire quite a few images from disk (after verifiying we had a copy on tape, of course). Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪

Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

2010-09-02 Thread Rusty.Major
I first did an ls -l and grabbed the image ID of the images I thought were too old and should have been destaged and expired off of the DSSU. I then took those images and ran them through bpimagelist to see if they had a copy on tape (or if it should have been expired). Those that had a copy on

Re: [Veritas-bu] Question for NetBackup 7.0 Dedup userORData Domain users

2010-08-25 Thread Rusty.Major
I have a NBU 7.0 domain configured backing up about 60 VMs using VADP going to Data Domain. It's been running for about 3 weeks now and I'm seeing dedupe rates just over 25x (~95+%). We are currently running daily incrementals (2wk retention) and weekly fulls (1month retention) which are

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restore Questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rusty.Major
In the Windows BAR GUI the default view is the colored dots timeline. I've noticed in this view sometimes that it does not show all the images. I switch it to the 'listing' view by deselecting the timeline option under ViewShow NBU History as a Timeline and I get everything I'm expecting.

Re: [Veritas-bu] destaging to multiple destinations

2010-08-06 Thread Rusty.Major
DSSU is a relocation (copy, if you will), which is why you don't have those advanced options. The bpduplicate command is what you want to use outside of DSSU relocation or Vault (or SLP if you go that way). I would recommend using Vault to do the additional copies and retention changes. It's

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMware vStorage NetBackup 7 design help

2010-08-03 Thread Rusty.Major
You can use SAN if you wish. You can use it if the client is setup to use FT, or if using VCB/VADP you can select the SAN Transfer Type option, or it *should* automatically select it if available when All Types is selected. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard

Re: [Veritas-bu] Mapped VMDK Backups in NBU7

2010-08-03 Thread Rusty.Major
After messing with it for awhile last week, it appears that it was two things: -Name resolution (VADP likes FQDNs) -Botched client install This particular VM was migrated from a 6.5.x environment and the implementation team installed NBU 7 client on top of it and apparently it did not take,

Re: [Veritas-bu] bperror differences in 6.5.x and 7.0

2010-07-29 Thread Rusty.Major
I can confirm the same command worked for me in a NBU 7.0 environment on Solaris 10 Master. I also checked the same command on a Windows 7.0 media server and it worked as well. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Java Admin Console on Linux

2010-07-28 Thread Rusty.Major
Not a cooler way, but if you want to run multiple Java GUIs on the same workstation, just do the base install into different directories. I typically make them install path\Java\60, install path\Java\65, etc. You woun't have any issues and the patches can find the appropriate version and

[Veritas-bu] Mapped VMDK Backups in NBU7

2010-07-27 Thread Rusty.Major
Hello everyone, I'm new to VMware and I'm setting up an environment that consists of virtualized NBU 7 Master (Linux) and Media (Win2k8) servers that backup a fully virtualized environment using the new vStorage APIs. There are currently only about 20 VMs I'm backing up currently, but every

Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP backups from Netapp using Netbackup

2010-07-27 Thread Rusty.Major
There is or was an 'issue' with NDMP where the dump levels for incrementals rolled past 9 and went back to 0, causing a full and it would stay at dump level 0 until the next scheduled full ran. I cannot find a technote or any documentation on it, but I believe it was related to cumulative incs

Re: [Veritas-bu] How to configure Netbackup 6.5 admin console to w/ 5.1 mstr?

2010-07-23 Thread Rusty.Major
I've never heard of that switch. Anytime you try to connect to one other the other, you get an error, therefore we had the other java version installed as well for when we needed it. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite

[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.6 Upgrade - No Java GUI?

2010-07-21 Thread Rusty.Major
I've just upgraded to 6.5.6 and while everything said it was successful, I can no longer log in with the Windows Java GUI. It sits at the login screen with Login in progress in the status bar. I have re-applied the patch (on top of 6.5.6), removed the 6.5.6 JAV patch (so it's at 6.5.5) and it

Re: [Veritas-bu] Can't get nbu to use drives, and cant 'up' the drives.

2010-07-16 Thread Rusty.Major
If the devices are scsi attached, you can take the system down to the OK prompt and run probe-scsi-all to verify that at the OS level, the drives are being presented. This page tells you how to do it: http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/114/troubleshoot-scsi-devices-with-probe-scsi-all/

[Veritas-bu] NDMP and Millions of Files

2010-06-14 Thread Rusty.Major
We have a NetApp filer that has a few TB of data made up largely of millions of small files (about 30 million or so) and we are using several NDMP policies to back up this data. The two main problems are length of time it takes to backup (we usually have 2-3 backups running all day every day)

Re: [Veritas-bu] how fo fool nbu client versions

2010-06-02 Thread Rusty.Major
Heading off topic, but for the benefit of those who had a heart-attack thinking they were out of support with 5.1 clients as they ARE supported with NBU 6.x Master/Media servers. NBU has supported two major versions back for as long as I can remember, perhaps that's the unspoken rule as I

Re: [Veritas-bu] Need to backup a server in the extranet.

2010-05-28 Thread Rusty.Major
In 6.x, all you should need is 13724 (vnetd), but have a look at the Port Usage Guide for Windows and UNIX Platform : http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/281623.htm. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.0 FileConnect Downloads

2010-05-18 Thread Rusty.Major
I'm trying to get NBU 7 installed on my test environment and am having trouble getting the downloaded file(s) prepped. The install guide for Unix claims A Readme file on FileConnect describes the following points:, however I see no readme file. I've tried to uncompress and extract them, but

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.0 FileConnect Downloads

2010-05-18 Thread Rusty.Major
Thanks, all, for the Windows document (Which I do see on FileConnect), but I was looking for specific Unix instructions. I ended up getting it worked out, but asked Symantec about the entry in the guide whice alludes to another Readme for Unix: The ESDimages forNetBackup 7.0 are available for

Re: [Veritas-bu] Parsing through bpimagelist

2010-02-26 Thread Rusty.Major
If you're on Windows, you can install Cygwin and then use grep/awk if you want to go that route, but the scripts others have provided are probably better. If this is something you need on a regular basis, you might consider a third party reporting tool (Aptare, VBR, etc.). NOM, which I think

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.5 --- ISSUES

2010-02-12 Thread Rusty.Major
If all you want is the listing of the clients, you just need the directory structure for the clients on the Master, you don't actually have to install all the client binaries if you don't want to. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Wildcards in Policy-BackupSelections

2010-01-22 Thread Rusty.Major
This is more of a limitation on the OS and the wildcards it supports than NBU. You can try *:\*\test and see if it works. Alternatively, if the local drives and dir structure is static, you can list the paths as such: C:\*\test E:\*\test in the policy file list. Even though only one path is

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Failing with Error Code 11

2010-01-21 Thread Rusty.Major
You can run bptestbpcd from the master and media servers to verify connectivity. bptestbpcd -host hostname -debug In place of -debug, you can use -verbose, or no option at all, but they get gradually less detailed respectively. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard

Re: [Veritas-bu] Files to exclude for hot catalog backups

2010-01-21 Thread Rusty.Major
I just exclude the images directory as that's the bulk of the size. There are also other configuration files and whatnot scattered all over that I'm not sure are captured in the hot backup. The size of the rest of the data is inconsequential to me. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Success Rate

2010-01-12 Thread Rusty.Major
I believe most people on the list are using a backup reporting tool. I use Aptare, but there are others and you can also script it to provide you success rates. Those who are watching their success rates are in the 90's. Those who are not think their rate is better than what it really is.

Re: [Veritas-bu] I inherited a mess.

2010-01-12 Thread Rusty.Major
You can import the LTO1 media (using the LTO3 drives, obviously) into the new catalogs. Hopefully you know which tapes the data is on, otherwise you have to import each tape until you find what you need. Before you insert these tapes into the drive, make sure you write protect them, and have

Re: [Veritas-bu] Robot vendors

2010-01-12 Thread Rusty.Major
Bart, We have i2000s, SL8500s and SL3000s, all over 700 slots. All are good libraries, but the SL libraries have capability of redundant robots. The SL8500 is a huge beast of a library, but that's nothing new to you with a Powerderhorn. The SL libraries can also be hooked up with ACS (the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Duplication / expiring image question

2010-01-08 Thread Rusty.Major
This is a good idea, I like it. While not applicable to this request, I would also document all of the images being expired so that in case you do mess up, you have the bpimagelist output that you can use to go back and unexpire, import, or have on hand to know which tapes need to be held out

Re: [Veritas-bu] FA for NetBackup 7

2009-12-18 Thread Rusty.Major
The binaries for Exchange and MSSQL are also included in the Windows client, but you have to license them before using, so this model is not new. It would be nice if Symantec clarified what is and is not included, though. It would be nice if they cleaned up the licensing model, too, while they

Re: [Veritas-bu] Media server offline after upgrade to NBU6.5

2009-12-18 Thread Rusty.Major
Yep, 6.5 is very picky about this. So is the Java GUI. Adding the FQDN to the hosts file has resolved a number of connection problems with the Java GUI. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪

Re: [Veritas-bu] FA for NetBackup 7

2009-12-18 Thread Rusty.Major
I agree, Ed. The same rep did tell me that the Java GUI will eventually go away. And since Ops Center will be/is web based, I would assume that would make the Windows Admin Console go away as well. I was glad to hear that the GUIs will be sticking around, as I had thought we were getting forced

[Veritas-bu] BPLIST question

2009-12-18 Thread Rusty.Major
I'm trying to get bplist to give me output on some images made for an SAP backup. All I keep getting is EXIT STATUS 227: no entity was found. These backups run daily and I know I have images, I just want to know the filelist for each one. I have used the following syntax: bplist -C clientname

Re: [Veritas-bu] BPLIST question

2009-12-18 Thread Rusty.Major
Disregard. I had to put the policy type in. I now see that the default is Windows (13)...which makes sense, these aren't windows backups! bplist -C clientname -t 17 -R 999 / The above does work for me. I thought I had tried it, but apparently not. Thanks to those who responded. Rusty Major,

Re: [Veritas-bu] pbx

2009-12-10 Thread Rusty.Major
The PBX binaries are on both DVD1 and DVD2 of your install media (pick one). I believe 6.5.4 patches PBX, but if you have an older version that isn't compatible with the 6.5.4 patch, you need to upgrade it from the install media. To install or upgrade your existing PBX, go to the appropriate

Re: [Veritas-bu] Duplication question

2009-12-08 Thread Rusty.Major
I agree, lifecycle is better as it will guarantee what you have requested to happen will happen before the images will expire. If you have a vault process fail, you may not get the images duplicated if you don't rerun it manually. All you'll have to do in Vault is setup the eject. Rusty Major,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Net Backup errors after Upgrade to Rel6.5

2009-12-04 Thread Rusty.Major
Did you update the Oracle server agents to the same major and minor level as the master/media servers? You didn't say if you went to 6.5.0 or applied any patches? I would at least patch to 6.5.3.1 or higher. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪

Re: [Veritas-bu] Hey you GUI guys!!!

2009-11-25 Thread Rusty.Major
Mark, First, all I could think of was the opening to the Electric Company where a lady yells HEY YOU GUYS For those lost in the 80's like me: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFYMijdQ_sA Anyway, I have not tried this in a while, but on the BAR client side GUI, select FileSpecifcy NetBackup

Re: [Veritas-bu] VBR Setup Q's

2009-11-20 Thread Rusty.Major
I understand that, Boris. My point was that OpsCenter will not have the advanced reporting (I forget what Symantec is calling the additional module) that you are used to today with Aptare. I do not know if the freebie VBR license will allow you to utilize this module or not once 7.0 comes

Re: [Veritas-bu] VBR Setup Q's

2009-11-19 Thread Rusty.Major
Boris, VBR will not be included in 7.0. There will be some reporting included in Ops Center which may be new reports to the base NetBackup product, but there will also be another option for additional, advanced, reporting - this is probably the stuff most of us would want. My XSP licensing

Re: [Veritas-bu] VBR Setup Q's

2009-11-18 Thread Rusty.Major
That's crazy. It sounds like they are digging for more info or trying to get you to convert to VBR. We are on this licensing model and the data we send them is via Aptare. I don't understand why they are making you do that. Sorry, that was of no help to you. We installed an older version of VBR

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMware backups to remote VMware Backup proxy server

2009-11-17 Thread Rusty.Major
I don't think you would like the results of this solution. As you know, a snapshot of the vm is copied to the backup proxy's holding tank and it isn't released on the ESX server until this is completed. I'm pretty sure you would end up with snapshots being released before the copy process is

Re: [Veritas-bu] ACS status = 29

2009-11-13 Thread Rusty.Major
I'm seeing the same issue at one site and I'm curious if your drive had a stuck tape, or for some other reason couldn't move the tape from the drive to the home cell? The problem I see is the tape gets stuck in the drive, cannot be unloaded, which causes NBU to constantly request another mount

  1   2   >