Re: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread pharrold
Not sure on the Windows side, as that sounds like hardware/firmware.  However, on the Solaris media server try running tpautoconf -report_disc Its possible EMM is having issues with the new WWNs being presented and thinks some of the drives are duplicates. Fairly easy to clean up once

[Veritas-bu] Restore issue between Linux gui and Windows gui.

2010-07-08 Thread tsimerson
I've seen this also. As much as people want to make Windows and UNIX play nicely together, there are just somethings that don't translate between the systems. The file system and file structure is one huge difference. I would see similar issues when logging into our AIX master server using

Re: [Veritas-bu] Performance tuning Windows 2008 client

2010-07-08 Thread Jack . Forester
When I'm doing my tests, I'm running the job only on a single client. I noticed some high latencies on the guest using the built in tools when running a test job yesterday, so I'm going to pursue your ideas further. Thanks for your feedback! -- Jack Forester, Jr. Sr. Data Protection

Re: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
Unix - on aix if I had done that I would bet my tape drive would have gone from avail to defined - where defined says it is in the database but cannot see the physical. So I would have removed it and run cfgmgr to rediscovery the tape drives. Not sure how that works on Solaris As to windows,

[Veritas-bu] Missing Drive.

2010-07-08 Thread pranav batra
Hello, Here we have a master/media server:-OS is Linux 2.4,RHEL 3.A tape library dell PV 132T-LT02 with two tape drives connected to it via scsi. 2 days ago drive path of one of the drives showed as missing.Rebooted the library+Server couple of times then tried to reconfigure the drives:-But

[Veritas-bu] alternate to /tmp using bp

2010-07-08 Thread Shyam Hazari
Is it possible to specify alternate location for /tmp while running bp command ? TIA -Shyam ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Catalog Copy ???////?/

2010-07-08 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
Hi Jonathan I thought Symantec did not support compressed volumes on a Catalog? But good to hear you got it working. Simon From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Missing Drive.

2010-07-08 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
Had recent issue like that, just reseated the fibre cable in the drive and in the switch and it came back fine. Can't hurt to try it. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of pranav batra Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 9:30

Re: [Veritas-bu] Missing Drive.

2010-07-08 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
Wonder if its worth deleting the drives from the Server (within NetBackup) and re-running Device Configuration Manager again? In regards to the missing drives, any power or cabling issues? Is it happening to one single drive all the time or the same drive.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Missing Drive.

2010-07-08 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
Would agree with this. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:14 PM To: pranav_vent...@hotmail.com;

Re: [Veritas-bu] Missing Drive.

2010-07-08 Thread pranav batra
To a single drive: Checked and found that the device files are missing from the server. Below are the files that are presently on the server: lrwxrwxrwx1 root root8 Jul 7 14:40 h2c0t2l0 - /dev/st1lrwxrwxrwx1 root root9 Jul 7 14:40 nh2c0t2l0 - /dev/nst1

Re: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Kevin Holtz
1. make sure all services are running. 2. try deleting devices drive/robot from the GUi. If it fails you can use vmglob -delete xxx from a command line. Once the devices are removed. 3. Run scan or sgscan in /volmgr/bin You should see a robot and x number of drives. Note: if you

Re: [Veritas-bu] (no subject)

2010-07-08 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
Load balancing come from the storage unit group. Here is a snippet - please read up more on Storage unit groups to find your best option. Option 4: Load Balance. If the user selects this option and installed the Capacity Management License key, Media Device Selection (MDS) balances the job

Re: [Veritas-bu] Catalog Copy ???////?/

2010-07-08 Thread Martin, Jonathan
If you enable compression after x number of days on a windows master then NetBackup compresses the catalog entries using NTFS compression after x days. (as opposed to gziping on Unix/Linux.) I didn’t really get anything working. I just compress everything for my “warm” DR (robo)copy.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Performance tuning Windows 2008 client

2010-07-08 Thread Wayne T Smith
(Knowing nothing about Win2008R2 and little about VMs, ...) I'd want to get together with my network folks to see if I'm getting dropped packets during the test. Misconfigured connections and overloaded routers can kill performance. I'd also look at windows performance stats ... perhaps memory

[Veritas-bu] NBU 7 Opscenter

2010-07-08 Thread ansa
Hi We trying to use Opscenter for reports, but its seams as if its a little buggy.the polling agents stops working sometimes and we have never had an last successfull data load anybody got some ideas ?. +-- |This was sent

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 7 Opscenter

2010-07-08 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:23 AM, ansa netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.comwrote: We trying to use Opscenter for reports, but its seams as if its a little buggy.the polling agents stops working sometimes and we have never had an last successfull data load anybody got some ideas ?.

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 7 Opscenter

2010-07-08 Thread Spencer O'Donnell
You need to install an agent in order to get the collections working. The agent can be installed on the master or on the Opscenter server. We couldn't install on the master because the agent wasn't supported on our master platform x86 Solaris. -Original Message- From:

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 7 Opscenter

2010-07-08 Thread Renee Carlisle
You do not need an agent if the Master is 7 and it is for monitoring a NBU master server. Yes, there is an engineering binary to fix the polling issue. Contact support. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

[Veritas-bu] NetBU 7

2010-07-08 Thread Will Tucker
Is anyone using NetBackup 7? If so, please identify the pros/cons of using it along with the gotchas. Thank you. Will Tucker | Storage Administrator Enterprise Technology Services Manhattan Associates, Inc. Direct +1 678.597.6644 Phone +1 770.955.7070 Fax +1 814.295.9676 Mobile +1

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
Martin, Jonathan: I tried http://support.microsoft.com/kb/315539 to view possible hidden tape drives due to path change. They did not appear. pharrold: While that is a very useful command in situations where it's needed, wouldnt deleting all the drives and rescanning for them via Netbackup's

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
Im having tape drives show up with the same BUS address... Drive 1 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 1, LUN 0 Drive 2 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 2, LUN 0 Drive 3 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 3, LUN 0 Drive 4 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 4, LUN 0 Drive 5 Location: Bus Number 0,

Re: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
All of my san drives show bus 0, thought this was normal. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Brandon35 Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:25 PM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject:

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
Drive 1 through 5 is on Switch A Drive 6 through 9 is on Switch B So that could be why the Location addresses are duplicating. Would that cause a problem though? +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
I meant duplicate Targed ID, not bus. Sorry +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--

Re: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread A Darren Dunham
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:24:59PM -0400, Brandon35 wrote: Im having tape drives show up with the same BUS address... Drive 1 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 1, LUN 0 Drive 2 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 2, LUN 0 Drive 3 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 3, LUN 0 Drive 4 Location:

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
I tried this on my solaris box, all I get is * ** SDT_TAPE * * and nothing... Is there anyway to get this same information on a windows box? What if i'm getting -1, -1, -1 ??

Re: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
The -1 -1 -1 says that it has lost the info on the drive. Try it by hand via the gui Go devices Drives Open up a drive that shows -1 -1 -1 for one of your windows servers From that window highlight the line for the media server that shows the -1's Choose remove Say ok Let it update. Once

Re: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Preston, Douglas
You need to delete the drives from windows netbackup gui and re add them Doug Preston -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Brandon35 Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 2:23 PM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread A Darren Dunham
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:22:48PM -0400, Brandon35 wrote: I tried this on my solaris box, all I get is * ** SDT_TAPE * * and nothing... So it's not currently detecting tape drives on the scsi-compatible busses. I imagine if you tried to

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
Thanks for the info Judy, Netbackup actually does not report any -1,-1,-1 I had only seen this in one of the Windows tape drive driver installers. One of my windows machines that is only seeing 5 of the 9 drives showed the first 5 drives with normal bus, location, id numbers. but the last 4

Re: [Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
Every time I have seen the -1 -1 -1 I had issues with the drive in NB and had to remove and read. Always happened when something on the SAN went a little wrong. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
A Darren Dunham, My environment looks like this: Master1 Solaris Media1 Linux Media2 Windows Media3 Windows Media4 Windows Media5 Windows Running tape -scan on each shows: Master1 : 0, but the netbackup gui finds 7... Media1: 9, gui finds 9 as well Media2: 9, gui says unable to retreive