Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
Before the catalog restore, did your master see itself as a FQDN (pbcobk01.intersil.com vs short name of PBCOBK01) ? Do you use the FQDN when the master/media servers are registered ? /Steve Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:21:07 -0400 From: jinfant...@intersil.com To: sk...@hotmail.com; jmart...@intersil.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu The only errors are for the device manager after the restore and only for one day. I expected those as we don’t have any libraries or drives connected to the new system. * PBCOBK01 3/19/12 08:06:24.211COMMAND PID LOAD TIME MEM STARTbpjobd 2060 100.000% 5-00:11:30.551 13M 3/14/12 07:54:35.642bpinetd 33400.000%0.452 9.7M 3/16/12 08:34:45.326bpjava-msvc 28280.000%0.015 5.9M 3/16/12 08:34:45.388nbevtmgr 30040.000% 40.653 23M 3/16/12 08:34:45.622dbsrv9 40520.000% 7:16.506 34M 3/16/12 08:34:45.794nbemm 3120.000% 3:32.020 44M 3/16/12 08:34:46.231nbrb 17480.000%1.076 23M 3/16/12 08:34:46.449vmd 36680.000%0.078 15M 3/16/12 08:34:46.605nbrmms 27360.000%4.305 26M 3/16/12 08:34:46.855bpdbm35680.000%0.218 15M 3/16/12 08:34:47.026bpcompatd26480.000%0.062 10M 3/16/12 08:34:47.167bprd 12560.000%1.778 14M 3/16/12 08:34:47.292nbjm 7760.000% 12.885 19M 3/16/12 08:34:47.432nbpem27240.000%0.343 23M 3/16/12 08:34:47.588nbproxy 26240.000%0.436 18M 3/16/12 08:34:47.682nbsl 25120.000%0.093 25M 3/16/12 08:34:47.744bmrd 28760.000%0.046 15M 3/16/12 08:34:48.056nbproxy 29600.000%0.031 14M 3/16/12 08:34:48.524nbstserv 4760.000%8.658 21M 3/16/12 08:34:49.413nbsvcmon 30320.000%0.093 15M 3/16/12 08:34:49.694nbproxy 26040.000%0.046 15M 3/16/12 19:54:43.846bpcompatd23280.000%0.031 11M 3/19/12 08:06:18.595bpps 15800.000%0.015 5.3M 3/19/12 08:06:23.182 Joe InfantinoMCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3Senior Systems AnalystSecurity and Server OperationsIntersil Corporation email: jinfantino@intersil.comoffice: 321-724-7119fax: 321-729-1186 www.intersil.com snip ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
Everything is done by shortname. Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com office: 321-724-7119 fax: 321-729-1186 www.intersil.com From: Steve Quan [mailto:sk...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:41 AM To: Infantino, Joe (Contractor); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Before the catalog restore, did your master see itself as a FQDN (pbcobk01.intersil.com vs short name of PBCOBK01) ? Do you use the FQDN when the master/media servers are registered ? /Steve Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:21:07 -0400 From: jinfant...@intersil.com To: sk...@hotmail.com; jmart...@intersil.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu The only errors are for the device manager after the restore and only for one day. I expected those as we don't have any libraries or drives connected to the new system. * PBCOBK01 3/19/12 08:06:24.211 COMMAND PID LOAD TIME MEM START bpjobd 2060 100.000% 5-00:11:30.551 13M 3/14/12 07:54:35.642 bpinetd 33400.000%0.452 9.7M 3/16/12 08:34:45.326 bpjava-msvc 28280.000%0.015 5.9M 3/16/12 08:34:45.388 nbevtmgr 30040.000% 40.653 23M 3/16/12 08:34:45.622 dbsrv9 40520.000% 7:16.506 34M 3/16/12 08:34:45.794 nbemm 3120.000% 3:32.020 44M 3/16/12 08:34:46.231 nbrb 17480.000%1.076 23M 3/16/12 08:34:46.449 vmd 36680.000%0.078 15M 3/16/12 08:34:46.605 nbrmms 27360.000%4.305 26M 3/16/12 08:34:46.855 bpdbm35680.000%0.218 15M 3/16/12 08:34:47.026 bpcompatd26480.000%0.062 10M 3/16/12 08:34:47.167 bprd 12560.000%1.778 14M 3/16/12 08:34:47.292 nbjm 7760.000% 12.885 19M 3/16/12 08:34:47.432 nbpem27240.000%0.343 23M 3/16/12 08:34:47.588 nbproxy 26240.000%0.436 18M 3/16/12 08:34:47.682 nbsl 25120.000%0.093 25M 3/16/12 08:34:47.744 bmrd 28760.000%0.046 15M 3/16/12 08:34:48.056 nbproxy 29600.000%0.031 14M 3/16/12 08:34:48.524 nbstserv 4760.000%8.658 21M 3/16/12 08:34:49.413 nbsvcmon 30320.000%0.093 15M 3/16/12 08:34:49.694 nbproxy 26040.000%0.046 15M 3/16/12 19:54:43.846 bpcompatd23280.000%0.031 11M 3/19/12 08:06:18.595 bpps 15800.000%0.015 5.3M 3/19/12 08:06:23.182 Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com office: 321-724-7119 fax: 321-729-1186 www.intersil.com http://www.intersil.com snip ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
What seems to stick out, is the target OS is 64bit (vs the original 32bit OS) and the problem only shows up after a good catalog restore /Steve --- From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:00:04 -0500 Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu You can reach the person managing the list at veritas-bu-ow...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest... Today's Topics: 1. cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 2. Re: cold catalog recovery (Shekel Tal) 3. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 4. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:38:58 -0400 From: Infantino, Joe (Contractor) jinfant...@intersil.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] cold catalog recovery To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: 13e204e614d8e04faf594c9aa9ed0bb712d79...@pbcomx02.intersil.corp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii We are trying to upgrade our NBU hardware and OS and are running into some issues that seem related to doing a cold catalog recovery and name resolution. Current setup: Windows 2003 x86 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 New setup: Windows 2008 x64 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 Current server and new server are configured with the same name and ip address. ISSUE: We can do a cold catalog backup and restore just fine but have a serious issue in the end. After both successes if we open the Activity Monitor we get an error - Not connected, check if services are up. All service are up. bpjobsd log shows 2 job_connect: Can't connect automatically to client pbcobk01 status = 25 err = 10061 2 job_connect: Can't connect to client pbcobk01 16 main: Can't connect to pbcobk01 (46) We did a complete system rebuild, installed NBU 6.5.6, and configured to write to disk. Test backup ran and Activity Monitor worked fine. Did the catalog recovery and the issue came back. I did some bpclntcmd tests and they all come back with the correct name but the IP shows as 127.0.0.1. I added the hostname and real IP to the hosts file with no luck. I tried the following tests: bpclntcmd -pn = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -self = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -hn pbcobk01 = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = correct host and xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for ip address If I do these test on the current server they come back with the actual IP of the system. TIA Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com www.intersil.com snip___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
Did you try run bpclntcmd prior to the upgrade? I also noticed the 64 bit and 32 bit change but wouldn't have thought it would make a difference Regards, Tal Shekel CSA FUJITSU From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Quan Sent: 16 March 2012 12:54 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 What seems to stick out, is the target OS is 64bit (vs the original 32bit OS) and the problem only shows up after a good catalog restore /Steve --- From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:00:04 -0500 Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu You can reach the person managing the list at veritas-bu-ow...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest... Today's Topics: 1. cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 2. Re: cold catalog recovery (Shekel Tal) 3. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 4. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:38:58 -0400 From: Infantino, Joe (Contractor) jinfant...@intersil.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] cold catalog recovery To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: 13e204e614d8e04faf594c9aa9ed0bb712d79...@pbcomx02.intersil.corp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii We are trying to upgrade our NBU hardware and OS and are running into some issues that seem related to doing a cold catalog recovery and name resolution. Current setup: Windows 2003 x86 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 New setup: Windows 2008 x64 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 Current server and new server are configured with the same name and ip address. ISSUE: We can do a cold catalog backup and restore just fine but have a serious issue in the end. After both successes if we open the Activity Monitor we get an error - Not connected, check if services are up. All service are up. bpjobsd log shows 2 job_connect: Can't connect automatically to client pbcobk01 status = 25 err = 10061 2 job_connect: Can't connect to client pbcobk01 16 main: Can't connect to pbcobk01 (46) We did a complete system rebuild, installed NBU 6.5.6, and configured to write to disk. Test backup ran and Activity Monitor worked fine. Did the catalog recovery and the issue came back. I did some bpclntcmd tests and they all come back with the correct name but the IP shows as 127.0.0.1. I added the hostname and real IP to the hosts file with no luck. I tried the following tests: bpclntcmd -pn = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -self = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -hn pbcobk01 = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = correct host and xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for ip address If I do these test on the current server they come back with the actual IP of the system. TIA Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com www.intersil.com snip Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited, from Fujitsu (FTS) Limited, or from Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited, together Fujitsu. This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free. Fujitsu Services Limited, registered in England No 96056, registered office 22 Baker Street, London W1U 3BW. Fujitsu (FTS) Limited, registered in England No 03808613, registered office 22 Baker Street, London W1U 3BW. Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited, registered in England No 2548187, registered office Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, Birmingham, B37 7YU.___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
The old system is still up as that was our fallback option. We don't have a spare drive in our lab to use for a hot catalog backup test, at least not yet. That was our next option, but we would need downtime again to do the catalog backup/restore. Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com office: 321-724-7119 fax: 321-729-1186 www.intersil.com From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:02 AM To: 'Shekel Tal'; 'Steve Quan'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Hi, I've gone from 32-bit to 64-bit with Linux on several occasions and did not have an issue; however I've not tried that with Windows. Do you still have the old master running? Have you tried using a hot catalog backup (cold backups are deprecated anyhow)? Justin. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Shekel Tal Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 8:58 AM To: Steve Quan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Did you try run bpclntcmd prior to the upgrade? I also noticed the 64 bit and 32 bit change but wouldn't have thought it would make a difference Regards, Tal Shekel CSA FUJITSU From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Quan Sent: 16 March 2012 12:54 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 What seems to stick out, is the target OS is 64bit (vs the original 32bit OS) and the problem only shows up after a good catalog restore /Steve --- From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:00:04 -0500 Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu You can reach the person managing the list at veritas-bu-ow...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest... Today's Topics: 1. cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 2. Re: cold catalog recovery (Shekel Tal) 3. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 4. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:38:58 -0400 From: Infantino, Joe (Contractor) jinfant...@intersil.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] cold catalog recovery To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: 13e204e614d8e04faf594c9aa9ed0bb712d79...@pbcomx02.intersil.corp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii We are trying to upgrade our NBU hardware and OS and are running into some issues that seem related to doing a cold catalog recovery and name resolution. Current setup: Windows 2003 x86 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 New setup: Windows 2008 x64 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 Current server and new server are configured with the same name and ip address. ISSUE: We can do a cold catalog backup and restore just fine but have a serious issue in the end. After both successes if we open the Activity Monitor we get an error - Not connected, check if services are up. All service are up. bpjobsd log shows 2 job_connect: Can't connect automatically to client pbcobk01 status = 25 err = 10061 2 job_connect: Can't connect to client pbcobk01 16 main: Can't connect to pbcobk01 (46) We did a complete system rebuild, installed NBU 6.5.6, and configured to write to disk. Test backup ran and Activity Monitor worked fine. Did the catalog recovery and the issue came back. I did some bpclntcmd tests and they all come back with the correct name but the IP shows as 127.0.0.1. I added the hostname and real IP to the hosts file with no luck. I tried the following tests: bpclntcmd -pn = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -self = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -hn pbcobk01 = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = correct host and xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for ip address If I do these test on the current server they come back with the actual IP of the system. TIA Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com www.intersil.com
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
From what I remember, the recommended catalog backup was the hot backup when it first appeared (in 6.0?). I have had to use it a couple of times with success every time. Even if it could be dumped to disk and transferred/mapped to the new system, it would be worth a try. From: Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com To: 'Shekel Tal' tal.she...@uk.fujitsu.com, 'Steve Quan' sk...@hotmail.com, veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: 03/16/2012 08:59 AM Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Sent by:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Hi, I?ve gone from 32-bit to 64-bit with Linux on several occasions and did not have an issue; however I?ve not tried that with Windows. Do you still have the old master running? Have you tried using a hot catalog backup (cold backups are deprecated anyhow)? Justin. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [ mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Shekel Tal Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 8:58 AM To: Steve Quan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Did you try run bpclntcmd prior to the upgrade? I also noticed the 64 bit and 32 bit change but wouldn?t have thought it would make a difference Regards, Tal Shekel CSA FUJITSU From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Quan Sent: 16 March 2012 12:54 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 What seems to stick out, is the target OS is 64bit (vs the original 32bit OS) and the problem only shows up after a good catalog restore /Steve --- From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:00:04 -0500 Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu You can reach the person managing the list at veritas-bu-ow...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest... Today's Topics: 1. cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 2. Re: cold catalog recovery (Shekel Tal) 3. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 4. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:38:58 -0400 From: Infantino, Joe (Contractor) jinfant...@intersil.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] cold catalog recovery To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: 13e204e614d8e04faf594c9aa9ed0bb712d79...@pbcomx02.intersil.corp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii We are trying to upgrade our NBU hardware and OS and are running into some issues that seem related to doing a cold catalog recovery and name resolution. Current setup: Windows 2003 x86 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 New setup: Windows 2008 x64 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 Current server and new server are configured with the same name and ip address. ISSUE: We can do a cold catalog backup and restore just fine but have a serious issue in the end. After both successes if we open the Activity Monitor we get an error - Not connected, check if services are up. All service are up. bpjobsd log shows 2 job_connect: Can't connect automatically to client pbcobk01 status = 25 err = 10061 2 job_connect: Can't connect to client pbcobk01 16 main: Can't connect to pbcobk01 (46) We did a complete system rebuild, installed NBU 6.5.6, and configured to write to disk. Test backup ran and Activity Monitor worked fine. Did the catalog recovery and the issue came back. I did some bpclntcmd tests and they all come back with the correct name but the IP shows as 127.0.0.1. I added the hostname and real IP to the hosts file with no luck. I tried the following tests: bpclntcmd -pn = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -self = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -hn pbcobk01 = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = correct host and xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for ip address If I do these test on the current server they come back with the actual IP of the system. TIA Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com www.intersil.com snip Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited, from Fujitsu (FTS) Limited, or from Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Limited, together Fujitsu. This email is only for the use
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
Hi, Does the D/R site have the same master, media servers as the source site? Does the master at the D/R site have network connectivity to the media servers and clients? If it has the same hostname as the other server, how will the client know which master server it is talking to? Or is the client in this case the master? Some screenshots or more logs of what is failing may be helpful. Bpbrm logs from the master, bpcd from the master, job details, etc. 2 job_connect: Can't connect automatically to client pbcobk01 status = 25 err = 10061 2 job_connect: Can't connect to client pbcobk01 16 main: Can't connect to pbcobk01 (46) Justin. From: Infantino, Joe (Contractor) [mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:05 AM To: Justin Piszcz; Shekel Tal; Steve Quan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 The old system is still up as that was our fallback option. We don't have a spare drive in our lab to use for a hot catalog backup test, at least not yet. That was our next option, but we would need downtime again to do the catalog backup/restore. Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com jinfant...@intersil.com office: 321-724-7119 fax: 321-729-1186 www.intersil.com From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:02 AM To: 'Shekel Tal'; 'Steve Quan'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Hi, I've gone from 32-bit to 64-bit with Linux on several occasions and did not have an issue; however I've not tried that with Windows. Do you still have the old master running? Have you tried using a hot catalog backup (cold backups are deprecated anyhow)? Justin. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Shekel Tal Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 8:58 AM To: Steve Quan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Did you try run bpclntcmd prior to the upgrade? I also noticed the 64 bit and 32 bit change but wouldn't have thought it would make a difference Regards, Tal Shekel CSA FUJITSU From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Quan Sent: 16 March 2012 12:54 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 What seems to stick out, is the target OS is 64bit (vs the original 32bit OS) and the problem only shows up after a good catalog restore /Steve --- From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:00:04 -0500 Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu You can reach the person managing the list at veritas-bu-ow...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest... Today's Topics: 1. cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 2. Re: cold catalog recovery (Shekel Tal) 3. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 4. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:38:58 -0400 From: Infantino, Joe (Contractor) jinfant...@intersil.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] cold catalog recovery To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: 13e204e614d8e04faf594c9aa9ed0bb712d79...@pbcomx02.intersil.corp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii We are trying to upgrade our NBU hardware and OS and are running into some issues that seem related to doing a cold catalog recovery and name resolution. Current setup: Windows 2003 x86 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 New setup: Windows 2008 x64 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 Current server and new server are configured with the same name and ip address. ISSUE: We can do a cold catalog backup and restore just fine but have a serious issue in the end. After both successes if we open the Activity Monitor we get an error - Not connected, check if services are up. All service are up. bpjobsd log shows 2 job_connect: Can't connect automatically to client pbcobk01 status = 25 err = 10061 2 job_connect: Can't connect to client pbcobk01 16 main: Can't connect to pbcobk01 (46) We did
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
client = master. We first saw the issue when we replaced the master server and had it on the production network. We reverted to the old server to keep things going while I brought the new hardware back to a lab and rebuilt the OS. I installed NBU and was able to configure it up and get things going. I then did a catalog recover and the problem came back. The problem exists when connected to the production network in the same configuration as the old setup and also in the lab with the server standalone. Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com office: 321-724-7119 fax: 321-729-1186 www.intersil.com From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:14 AM To: Infantino, Joe (Contractor); 'Shekel Tal'; 'Steve Quan'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Hi, Does the D/R site have the same master, media servers as the source site? Does the master at the D/R site have network connectivity to the media servers and clients? If it has the same hostname as the other server, how will the client know which master server it is talking to? Or is the client in this case the master? Some screenshots or more logs of what is failing may be helpful. Bpbrm logs from the master, bpcd from the master, job details, etc. 2 job_connect: Can't connect automatically to client pbcobk01 status = 25 err = 10061 2 job_connect: Can't connect to client pbcobk01 16 main: Can't connect to pbcobk01 (46) Justin. From: Infantino, Joe (Contractor) [mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:05 AM To: Justin Piszcz; Shekel Tal; Steve Quan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 The old system is still up as that was our fallback option. We don't have a spare drive in our lab to use for a hot catalog backup test, at least not yet. That was our next option, but we would need downtime again to do the catalog backup/restore. Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com mailto:jinfant...@intersil.com office: 321-724-7119 fax: 321-729-1186 www.intersil.com From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:02 AM To: 'Shekel Tal'; 'Steve Quan'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Hi, I've gone from 32-bit to 64-bit with Linux on several occasions and did not have an issue; however I've not tried that with Windows. Do you still have the old master running? Have you tried using a hot catalog backup (cold backups are deprecated anyhow)? Justin. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Shekel Tal Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 8:58 AM To: Steve Quan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 Did you try run bpclntcmd prior to the upgrade? I also noticed the 64 bit and 32 bit change but wouldn't have thought it would make a difference Regards, Tal Shekel CSA FUJITSU From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Quan Sent: 16 March 2012 12:54 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 What seems to stick out, is the target OS is 64bit (vs the original 32bit OS) and the problem only shows up after a good catalog restore /Steve --- From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:00:04 -0500 Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu You can reach the person managing the list at veritas-bu-ow...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest... Today's Topics: 1. cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 2. Re: cold catalog recovery (Shekel Tal) 3. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 4. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:38:58 -0400 From: Infantino, Joe
Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
Just to clarify, this is our second Windows 2003 x86 to Windows 2008 x64 NBU 6.5.6 upgrade via cold catalog backup. We preformed our first last December in the same manner with much success. There is a possibility that the cold backup was bad, and we'd like to test a hot catalog backup as well. Unfortunately we're bound by significant time and hardware constraints, so troubleshooting the cold catalog backup we have is less painful than getting a 2nd outage for another cold catalog or finding an LTO drive to test with. -Jonathan From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Quan Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 8:54 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 What seems to stick out, is the target OS is 64bit (vs the original 32bit OS) and the problem only shows up after a good catalog restore /Steve --- From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:00:04 -0500 Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu You can reach the person managing the list at veritas-bu-ow...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest... Today's Topics: 1. cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 2. Re: cold catalog recovery (Shekel Tal) 3. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) 4. Re: cold catalog recovery (Infantino, Joe (Contractor)) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:38:58 -0400 From: Infantino, Joe (Contractor) jinfant...@intersil.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] cold catalog recovery To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: 13e204e614d8e04faf594c9aa9ed0bb712d79...@pbcomx02.intersil.corp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii We are trying to upgrade our NBU hardware and OS and are running into some issues that seem related to doing a cold catalog recovery and name resolution. Current setup: Windows 2003 x86 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 New setup: Windows 2008 x64 SP2 NBU 6.5.6 Current server and new server are configured with the same name and ip address. ISSUE: We can do a cold catalog backup and restore just fine but have a serious issue in the end. After both successes if we open the Activity Monitor we get an error - Not connected, check if services are up. All service are up. bpjobsd log shows 2 job_connect: Can't connect automatically to client pbcobk01 status = 25 err = 10061 2 job_connect: Can't connect to client pbcobk01 16 main: Can't connect to pbcobk01 (46) We did a complete system rebuild, installed NBU 6.5.6, and configured to write to disk. Test backup ran and Activity Monitor worked fine. Did the catalog recovery and the issue came back. I did some bpclntcmd tests and they all come back with the correct name but the IP shows as 127.0.0.1. I added the hostname and real IP to the hosts file with no luck. I tried the following tests: bpclntcmd -pn = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -self = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -hn pbcobk01 = correct short name with 127.0.0.1 bpclntcmd -ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = correct host and xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx for ip address If I do these test on the current server they come back with the actual IP of the system. TIA Joe Infantino MCP, MCSA, Security+, ITILv3 Senior Systems Analyst Security and Server Operations Intersil Corporation email: jinfant...@intersil.com www.intersil.com snip ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
